The White Falcon


The White Falcon - 23.09.1944, Blaðsíða 5

The White Falcon - 23.09.1944, Blaðsíða 5
5 Size of the crowd which packed Andrews Fieldhouse for Sunday night’s performance of the Marlene Dietrich show can be judged from photo below taken from the improvised stage. Miss Dietrich is seen before the microphone. Right, Miss Dietrich looks up from her plate of GI rations as she dines in an enlisted men’s messhall at a QM outfit here. In left fore- ground is Jerry Cummins, accordianist with the troupe. — Marlene Wows ’Em U. S. Relaxes Rationing Of Food Items To avoid a Waste of perishable foods — of which the Govern- ment is now reported to have vast stores on hand — many items were this week removed from the ration list by U.S. War Mobiliz- ation Director James F. Byrnes. Food items which thus became nation-free were all varieties of jam, jelly, asparagus, and the fol- lowing canned goods: peas, bak- ed beans, fresh lima beans, tom- ato paste, pumkin, squash and ..baby food. Principal foods which still re- quire" points are creamy butter, margarine, cheese, canned fruit, canned tomatoes, canned milk, ketchup, hams, pork, loin and better grades of steaks. Veteran of Cassino Wins Home Front Battle In Chicago A battle on the home front was won by a wounded veteran of Cassino last week when he per- suaded 600 workers in Chicago to return to the manufacture of engines for B29 Super-Fortress- es. The veteran — Pvt. Melvin Biegel — told striking empoyees of the Chrysler Corporation’s huge plant that American air power was the'principal factor in the defeat of the Germans at Cassino. Doing A Great Job U.S. planes of the ATC are crossing the Atlantic at the rale of one every 22 minutes. After a four-year lapse, the Naz- ] is' vaunted Siegfried Line is back in the news. Is it as tough as Germans claim — or is its re- puted impregnability just Nazi propaganda? The answer is not simple, but the Siegfried Line is no mere invention of Dr. Goebbels’ pro- paganda factory. Whether or not it will prove a serious obstacle is expected to depend, in the final test, on what German man- power can put into it. Here are some observations on the Siegfried works given to an Army News Service corre- spondent by a senior officer at Supreme Headquarters, AEF: Partly dismantled. Most of the Line was con- structed during the “golden age” of Nazism when the Huns had plenty of manpower, plenty of material — and plenty of time. \ Construction was started in 1936. But after the fall of France ’ in 1940, not only was work on the Siegfried Line stopped, but the network of bastions was in a measure dismantled. Its mine- fields were lifted and its barbed wire stripped away and —- at considerable expense — portions of the Line were turned back into farmland. The concrete in- { stallations, of course, underwent some degree of deterioration. On the subject of the con- crete employed in construction of the Line, however, there is this to be noted: There was less need for economy wrhen it was poured and a sturdier mixture was used by the builders of the Siegfried than was used when later fortifications — such as the Atlantic Wall — were er- How Tough Is The Siegfried Line? ected. Another advantage that the Siegfried derives from its age is natural camouflage. Grass and undergrowth have sprung up around and over its concrete emplacements and the conceal- ment is good. Out-dated. On the other side of the ledger is the fact that the Line’s age keeps its installations from be- ing up to modern standards. Wall thicknesses are less than in subsequent works and gun emplacements are not roofed. Neither the power of 1944 artil- lery nor the full potentialities of air strength were foreseen when the Siegfried Line was built. The strength of the Line var- ies in different sectors. For ex- ample, where the Rhine forms on the frontier, the fortifications are relatively thin, but along the stretch where the Siegfried con- fronts the old Maginot Line it is stoutly put together. It is at this point where the so-called Metz Gateway and the Moselle Valley offer a natural avenue for attacks from the west. The Line thins out again where it faces the Ardennes Forest and becomes stronger farther north where it meets flat terrain. Designed for counterattack. Unlike the Maginot Line which was designed for a static de- fense, the Siegfried is designed for the German formula of strong counterattack. It was contemplated that the enemy might make headway into the Siegfried’s defenses but that he would promptly be hurled out again by counterattacking Ger- man reserves. In fact, the ability of the Sieg- fried Line to turn back an ass- ault depends greatly on strong reserves. How many are needed to man it is a debatable question. Even in its strongest stretches the Siegfried is believed to be in only moderate depth. Its1 first obstructions are minefields and barbed wire. Behind these arc pillboxes for machine guns and antitank guns. Next are concrete shelters for the off-dufy men and local reserves, while farther to the rear are artillery positions and flak gun sites. All pillboxes are built to pro- vide enfilade fire covering one or more neighoring pillboxes. Many of these minor fortresses cannot fire directly ahead. Conceived in 1917. The Siegfiied Line was con- ceived by Col. Fritz von Loss- berg 27 yeas ago during the battl- es of Arras in France. Appointed ! chief of staff of the German Sixth Army on Apr. 10, 1917, the1 day after it had been truck a terrific blow by the British, he \ improvised a system of mobile,! elastic, zonal defense in depth, j the general theory (copied in the present day line) being delaying- action by the outposts, ever stronger resistance on successive lines of defense — between which the ground is checkered with forts, machine gun nests and! other strongpoints — and finally heavy counterattacks by mobile divisions. Like battle fleet. A Belgian journalist in 1939 called the line ,a fleet moored along the frontier. The fleet had , flotilla craft to scout for it — i blockhouses garrisoned by 20 or 30 men assigned to hold up the advance so that the German command might gauge the main point of attack. As cruisers, it had a line of artillery in evolving ! gun-turret1' and capital ships were underground fortresses. He described the big forts as buried barracks with miles of passages lit by electricity. Whole hills were hollowed out and con- creted, and the approaches blank- eted with minefields and covered by fire. JUNK HEAP — This road through the Belgian village of Gognes Chauvec looks like a junk heap after American planes trapped a German con- voy retreating before the advance of Allied soldiers.

x

The White Falcon

Beinir tenglar

Ef þú vilt tengja á þennan titil, vinsamlegast notaðu þessa tengla:

Tengja á þennan titil: The White Falcon
https://timarit.is/publication/382

Tengja á þetta tölublað:

Tengja á þessa síðu:

Tengja á þessa grein:

Vinsamlegast ekki tengja beint á myndir eða PDF skjöl á Tímarit.is þar sem slíkar slóðir geta breyst án fyrirvara. Notið slóðirnar hér fyrir ofan til að tengja á vefinn.