Tímarit Verkfræðingafélags Íslands


Tímarit Verkfræðingafélags Íslands - 01.02.1984, Blaðsíða 14

Tímarit Verkfræðingafélags Íslands - 01.02.1984, Blaðsíða 14
Icelandic experience in transfer of energy technology by Injjvar Birgir Fridleifsson, UNIJ Geothermal Co-ordinator, National Energy Authority, Reykjavík, Iceland. Andrés Svanbjörnsson, Managing Director, Virkir Consulting Group Ltd., Reykjavík, Iceland, and Loftur Thorsteinsson, General Manager, VST Ltd., Consulting Engineers, Reykjavík, Iceland. ABSTRACT Until 1970, Icelandic Scientists and engineers obtained their university education abroad. Basic technology transfer was therefore largely through education in Europe and N-America. For major energy projects foreign con- sultants were hired. The number of chartered engineers rose from 13 in 1912 to 890 in 1982. The first hydropower station in Iceland was commissioned in 1904. Six- teen power stations up to 8 MW were designed by Icelandic engineers until 1960, but three stations (total capacity 89 MW) in one river by foreign con- sultants. A 240 MW station commis- sioned in 1969 was designed by foreign consultants, but 150 and 210 MW sta- tions commissioned in 1977 and 1981 were designed jointly by Icelandic and foreign engineers. Five hydroprojects (total capacity 700 MW) planned for the near future will be completely designed by Icelandic engineers. The development of geothermal in- stallations has largely been in the hands of lcelandic scientists and engineers as lceland has been one of the pioneer countries in harnessing this unconven- tional energy source. The first geother- mal district heating system in Iceland was installed in 1930. In 1981, 75% of the population heated their houses by geothermal heat. Since 1951, lcelandic geothermal experts have worked as con- sultants in 32 countries. In 1979 an in- ternational training course in advanced geothermal technology was started in Iceland under the auspices of the UN University. In the Icelandic experience at home and abroad the key to a successful technology transfer lies in the level of education of the counterpart of the foreign consultants. Prior to acting as the local counterpart he should prefer- ably receive some advanced training abroad. This gives him a sense of authority valuable for stressing the significance of local conditions and in resisting tendencies of foreign con- sultants to play safe by overdimension- ing. This will further secure that ex- perience gained during the design and construction of an energy project is kept in the country. INTRODUCTION Iceland is a mountainous country of about 103.000 km2 with a population of only about 230.000 but ample sources of hydropower and geothermal energy. The total run-off energy of the country has been estimated at 187 TWh/year and thereof the theoretically harness- able hydropower energy 64 TWh/year (1). However, when cost and environ- mental aspects are taken into considera- tion, the practically harnessable energy is probably closer to 30 TWh/year. The present installed hydropower capacity is about 750 MW, with a potential energy production of 4 TWh/year. Technically harnessable geothermal resources in the country are estimated to be about 3,500 x 1018 Joule (2), but the installed geothermal capacity is about 41 MWe (electric) and 960 MWt (thermal) (3). In 1978 the total primary energy consump- tion in Iceland was 23.2xIO15 Joule (6.4 TWh/year) from imported fossil fuel, I8.6xl015 Joule (5.2 TWh/year) from geothermal power and I0.4x 1015 Joule (2.9 TWh/year) from hydropower (4). To demonstrate how Iceland has developed from being dependent on foreign expertise for the design and con- struction of large energy projects towards self sufficiency and export of technological knowhow, this article will in separate chapters deal briefly with technology education, with the deveiop- ment of hydropower as well as geother- Grein þessi er um reynslu íslendinga af flutningi tœkniþekkingar þjóða I milli. Hún var upphaflega samin vegna Alþjóða orkumálaráðstefnunnar 1983, en var ekki birt. mal projects in the country, and finally summarize the Icelandic experience in the transfer of energy technology both at home and abroad. TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION Until 1970, Icelandic engineers and scientists obtained a part of or all their university education abroad. Basic technology transfer was therefore large- ly through education at universities and technical colleges in Europe and N-America. Prior to the Second World War university education was mainly sought in Denmark, Sweden and Ger- many, but during the war many students went to the USA. Due to restrictions and communication dif- ficulties in Europe during the Second World War the University of Iceland started to offer education in engineer- ing. From the 1940’s students of engineering could take the basic courses (first 3 years) at the University of lceland, but had to go abroad to com- plete their studies. They went preferably to Denmark, Norway and Sweden, as agreements had been made between the University of Iceland and universities in these countries. During the last three decades a large number of students have gone for undergraduate or postgraduate training in science and technology to the Scandinavian countries, U.K., U.S.A. and W-Germany, but in smaller numbers to E-Germany, France, U.S.S.R. and others. Since 1970, B.Sc. degrees have been given at the Universi- 6 - TÍMARIT VFÍ 1984

x

Tímarit Verkfræðingafélags Íslands

Beinir tenglar

Ef þú vilt tengja á þennan titil, vinsamlegast notaðu þessa tengla:

Tengja á þennan titil: Tímarit Verkfræðingafélags Íslands
https://timarit.is/publication/860

Tengja á þetta tölublað:

Tengja á þessa síðu:

Tengja á þessa grein:

Vinsamlegast ekki tengja beint á myndir eða PDF skjöl á Tímarit.is þar sem slíkar slóðir geta breyst án fyrirvara. Notið slóðirnar hér fyrir ofan til að tengja á vefinn.