Læknablaðið - 15.07.1995, Blaðsíða 20
534
LÆKNABLAÐIÐ 1995; 81
antigen in specimens from high risk patients. Diagn Mi-
crobiol Infect Dis 1994; 18: 101-4.
7. Thomas BJ, Evans RT, Hawkins DA, Taylor-Robinson
D. Sensitivity of detecting Chlamydia trachomatis ele-
mentary bodies in smears by use of fluorescein-labelled
monoclonal antibody: comparison with conventional
Chlamydial isolation. J Clin Pathol 1984; 37: 812-6.
8. Tilton RC, Barnes RC, Gruninger RP, Judson FN,
Ryan WR, Steingrímsson Ó. Multicenter comparative
evaluation of two rapid microscopic methods and culture
for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in patient speci-
mens. J Clin Microbiol 1988; 26: 167-70.
9. Vogels WHM, Van Vooist Vader PC, Schröder FP.
Chlamydia trachomatis Infection in a high risk popula-
tion: Comparison of polymerase chain reaction and cell
culture for diagnosis and follow-up. J Clin Microbiol
1993; 31: 1103-7.
10. Bauwens JE, Clark AM, Stamm WE. Diagnosis of Chla-
mydia trachomatis endocervical infections by a commer-
cial polymerase chain reaction assay. J Clin Microbiol
1993; 31: 3023-7.
11. Bauwens JE, Clark AM, Loeffelholz MJ, Herman SA,
Stamm WE. Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis ure-
thritis by polymerase chain reaction of first-catch urine.
J Clin Microbiol 1993; 31: 3013-6.
12. Jaschek G, Gaydos CA, Welsh LE, Quinn TC. Direct
detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urine specimens
from symptomatic and asymptomatic men by using a
rapid polymerase chain reaction assay. J Clin Microbiol
1993; 31: 1209-12.
13. Stamm WE. Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis geni-
tourinary infections. Ann Intern Med 1988; 108: 710-7.