Læknablaðið

Ukioqatigiit

Læknablaðið - 15.11.1999, Qupperneq 20

Læknablaðið - 15.11.1999, Qupperneq 20
872 LÆKNABLAÐIÐ 1999; 85 18. Starfsreglur Leitarstöðvar Krabbameinsfélagsins. Lækna- blaðið 1997; 83: 604-8. 19. Sigurdsson K. Quality assurance in cervical cancer screen- ing: the Icelandic experience 1964-1993. Eur J Cancer 1995; 31A: 728-34. 20. Sigurdsson K, Hrafnkelsson J, Geirsson G, Gudmundsson J, Salvarsdottir A. Screening as a prognostic factor in cervi- cal cancer: analysis of survival and prognostic factors based on Icelandic population data, 1964-1988. Gynecol Oncol 1991;43:64-70. 21. Gardner MJ, Altman DG. Calculating confídence intervals for proportions and their differences. In: Gardner MJ, Altman DG, eds. Statistics with confidence. Br Med J; 1989: 28-30. 22. Disaia PJ, Morrow DP, Townsend DE. Staging and classifi- cation. In: Quilligan EJ, ed. Synopsis of gynecologic onco- logy. New York: Wiley; 1975: 2-5. 23. Poulsen HE, Taylor CW, Sobin LH. Histological classifi- cation of female genital tract tumours. In: WHO internatio- nal histological classification of tumours. Geneva: WHO; 1975: 25-6. 24. Magnus K, Langmark F, Andersen A. Mass screening for cervical cancer in 0stfold county of Norway 1959-1977. Int JCancer 1987;39:311-6. 25. Björge T, Gunbj0rud AB, Langmark F, Skare GB, Thoresen S0. Cervical mass screening in Norway - 510,000 smears a year. Cancer Detect Prev 1994; 18: 463-70. 26. Lynge E, Arffmann E, Behnfeld L, Byrjalsen C, Glenth0j A, H0lund B, et al. Forebyggende unders0gelser mod liv- moderhalskræft i Danmark. Status i 1995. Planer for 1996. Ugeskr Læger 1996; 158: 4916-9. 27. Láára E, Day NE, Hakama M. Trends in mortality from cervical cancer in the Nordic countries: association with organized screening programmes. Lancet 1987; I: 1247-9. 28. Sigurdsson K. Effect of organized screening on the risk of cervical cancer. Evaluation of screening activity in Iceland, 1964-1991. Int J Cancer 1993; 54: 563-70. 29. Hakama M, Louhivuori K. A screening programme for cervical cancer that worked. Cancer Surv 1988; 7: 403-16. 30. Hakama M, Magnus K, Pettersson F, Storm H, Tulinius H. Eífect of organized screening on the risk of cervical cancer in the Nordic countries. In: Miller AB, Chamberlain J, Day NE, Hakama M, Prorok PC, eds. Cancer screening. Pub- lished for UICC, Geneva. Cambridge: Cambridge Univer- sity Press; 1991: 153-62. 31. Forsmo S, Buhaug H, Skjeldestad FE, Haugen OA. Treat- ment of pre-invasive conditions during opportunistic screening and its effectiveness on cervical cancer incidence in one Norwegian county. Int J Cancer 1997; 71: 4-8. 32. Chamberlain J. Reasons that some screening programmes fail to control cervical cancer. In: Hakama M, Miller AB, Day NE, eds. Screening for cancer fo the uterine cervix. IARCSci Publ 1986; 76: 161-8. 33. Vizcaino AP, Moreno V, Bosch FX, Munoz N, Barros-Dios XM, Parkin DM. Intemational trends in the incidence of cervical cancer: I. Adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous cell carcinomas. Int J Cancer 1998; 75: 536-45. 34. Shingleton HM, Bell MC, Fremgen A, Chmiel JS, Russell AH, Jones WB, et al. Is there really a difference in survival of women with squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, and adenosquamous cell carcinoma of the cervix? Cancer 1995; 76: 1948-55. 35. Schwartz SM, Weiss NS. Increased incidence of adenocar- cinoma of the cervix in young women in the Unitet States. Am J Epidemiol 1986; 124: 1045-7. 36. Geirsson G, Johannesson G, Tulinius H. Tumours in Ice- land. 5. Malignant tumours of the cervix uteri. Histological types, clinical stages and effect of mass screening. Acta Path Microbiol Immunol Scand A 1982; 90: 139-43. 37. Gustafsson L, Pontén J, Bergström R, Adami H-O. Inter- national incidence rates of invasive cervical cancer before cytological screening. Int J Cancer 1997; 71: 159-65. 38. Sigurdsson, K. The Icelandic and Nordic cervical screening programmes: trends in incidence and mortality rates through 1995. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1999; 78: 478- 85. 39. Hakulinen T, Andersen A, Malker B, Pukkala E, Schou G, Tulinius H. Trends in cancer incidence in the Nordic countries. Acta Pathol Microbiol Immunol Scand Sect A 1986; 94/Suppl. 288: 1-151. 40. Cruickshank ME, Angus V, Kelly M, McPhee S, Kitchener HC. The case for stopping cervical screening at age 50. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997; 104: 586-9. 41. Sigurdsson K. Trends in cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia in Iceland through 1995: Evaluation of targeted age groups and screening intervals. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1999; 78: 486-492. 42. Anttila A, Pukkala E, Söderman B, Kallio M, Nieminen P, Hakama M. Effect of organised screening on cervical can- cer incidence and mortality in Finland, 1963-1995: recent increase in cervical cancer incidence. Int J Cancer 1999; 83: 59-65. Fræðigreinar íslenskra lækna í erlendum tímaritum Getið er fræðigreina. Sendið heiti greinar, nöfn höfunda og birtingarstað til Lækna- blaðsins. Miðað er við greinar sem birst hafa á yfirstandandi og síðasta ári. Til glöggvunar verður íslenskra höfunda getið nieð fornafni þótt þess sé ekki getið við birtingu. * Luhr OR, Antonsen K, Magnús Karlsson, Aardal S, Aðalbjörn Þorsteinsson, Frostell CG, et al. Incidence and Mortality after Acute Respiratory Failure and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Sweden, Denmark and Iceland. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 1999; 159: 1849-61. * Helga Hannesdóttir. Child and adoles- cent psychiatry in Iceland. In: Remschmidt H, van Engeland H, eds. Child and Adolescent Psychiatry in Europe. Darmstadt: Springer; 1999.
Qupperneq 1
Qupperneq 2
Qupperneq 3
Qupperneq 4
Qupperneq 5
Qupperneq 6
Qupperneq 7
Qupperneq 8
Qupperneq 9
Qupperneq 10
Qupperneq 11
Qupperneq 12
Qupperneq 13
Qupperneq 14
Qupperneq 15
Qupperneq 16
Qupperneq 17
Qupperneq 18
Qupperneq 19
Qupperneq 20
Qupperneq 21
Qupperneq 22
Qupperneq 23
Qupperneq 24
Qupperneq 25
Qupperneq 26
Qupperneq 27
Qupperneq 28
Qupperneq 29
Qupperneq 30
Qupperneq 31
Qupperneq 32
Qupperneq 33
Qupperneq 34
Qupperneq 35
Qupperneq 36
Qupperneq 37
Qupperneq 38
Qupperneq 39
Qupperneq 40
Qupperneq 41
Qupperneq 42
Qupperneq 43
Qupperneq 44
Qupperneq 45
Qupperneq 46
Qupperneq 47
Qupperneq 48
Qupperneq 49
Qupperneq 50
Qupperneq 51
Qupperneq 52
Qupperneq 53
Qupperneq 54
Qupperneq 55
Qupperneq 56
Qupperneq 57
Qupperneq 58
Qupperneq 59
Qupperneq 60
Qupperneq 61
Qupperneq 62
Qupperneq 63
Qupperneq 64
Qupperneq 65
Qupperneq 66
Qupperneq 67
Qupperneq 68
Qupperneq 69
Qupperneq 70
Qupperneq 71
Qupperneq 72
Qupperneq 73
Qupperneq 74
Qupperneq 75
Qupperneq 76
Qupperneq 77
Qupperneq 78
Qupperneq 79
Qupperneq 80
Qupperneq 81
Qupperneq 82
Qupperneq 83
Qupperneq 84
Qupperneq 85
Qupperneq 86
Qupperneq 87
Qupperneq 88
Qupperneq 89
Qupperneq 90
Qupperneq 91
Qupperneq 92
Qupperneq 93
Qupperneq 94
Qupperneq 95
Qupperneq 96
Qupperneq 97
Qupperneq 98
Qupperneq 99
Qupperneq 100

x

Læknablaðið

Direct Links

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Læknablaðið
https://timarit.is/publication/986

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.