Læknablaðið : fylgirit - 15.06.2002, Blaðsíða 14

Læknablaðið : fylgirit - 15.06.2002, Blaðsíða 14
ABSTRACTS / ICELAND 2002: EMERGENCY MEDICINE BETWEEN CONTINENTS therapy) in patients with ARF, with particular reference to blood gas effects, intubation rate and mortality. Design: retrospective study. Methods: between August 2001 and January 2002,53 patients (pts) received NIV for an episode of ARF. NIV was given by face mask with a ventilatory assist device (Pulmonetics - LTV 1000). Results: 39 pts received NIV for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (27 acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema (ACPE) - mean age 76.4±6.6; 12 ALI/ARDS - mean age 74.18±9.51) and 14 pts received NIV for acute exacerbation of COPD (mean age 76±3). Failure was defined as the need for invasive ventilation. NIV was successful in 47 pts (88%); all pts who underwent NIV survived, while 4 (66%) of the pts who needed invasive ventilation died. NIV was successful in all pts with ACPE, in all but one of pts with acute exacerbalion COPD and in 7/12 (58%) pts with ALI/ARDS. Complications were rare: only 1 pt developed skin necrosis. • ACPE: after the first hour of NIV treatment significant changes in clinical-physiological parameters were found (improvement in Pa02/Fi02, pH, respiratory rate, heart rate, PaC02, systolic blood pressure, Sp02; p < 0.01 in all samples). Five pts with NSTEMI were treated successfully with NIV; 4 of these showed ECG or cardiac markers alteration before starting NIV, only one developed ECG alterations a few hours after NIV treatment. All 5 pts had a story of CAD or CHF. • COPD: in acute exacerbation of COPD a significant improve- ment of pH, respiratory rate, PaC02 and Sp02 was observed after 1 hour of trealment (pH 7.23 to 7.30; PaC02 81 to 69; RR: 35 to 28; Sp02: 85 to 92; p < 0.05 in all samples). Only 1 pt required invasive ventilation. • ALI/ARDS: of 12 pts with ALI/ARDS, 7 successfully under- went NIV trial; in this group a significant improvement of Pa02/Fi02, RR and Sp02 (Pa02/Fi02:68 to 128; RR: 36 to 26; Sp02:75 to 94- p<0.05 for all samples) was observed after 1 hour of treatment, while no changes were found in the failure group. Of the 5 pts who required invasive ventilation, 3 died. Condusion: NIV, delivered by face mask, can result in early improvement of physiological parameters in pts with acute exacer- bation of COPD and in pts with ACPE. A trial with NIV may be tried in pts with ALI/ARDS, but if no improvement is seen in the first hours endotracheal intubation should be carried out as soon as possible. 015- Airway/Respiratory Emergencies Non invasive mechanical ventilation (NIV) vs. continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema (ACPE) Ferrari G, De Salvia A, Aprá F, Petrino R, Olliveri F St. Giovanni Bosco Hospital -Turin. Italy Background: Cardiogenic pulmonary edema is a frequent cause of respiratory failure. CPAP has been shown to be effective in patients (pts) with ACPE who remain hypoxic despite standard medical therapy, while NIV is generally reserved for pts who fail a CPAP trial. Objective: To assess ACPE patients' response to NIV or CPAP treatment. Methods: A retrospective study was undertaken of 52 pts with clinical-radiological diagnosis of ACPE. In addition to standard medical therapy (oxygen, nitrates, diuretics and morphine), pts were treated with NIV or CPAP at the discretion of the physician in the Emergency Department. 27 pts received NIV and 25 CPAP through a face mask with a ventilatory assist device (Pulmonetics - LTV 1000). Fi02 was started at 1 and then decreased to keep saturation > 92%; PSV was started with 10 cmH20 and increased to obtain an expiratory tidal volume > 7 ml/kg and to decrease the respiratory rate (RR); CPAP/PEEP was started at 5 cmH^O and incremented to reach pulse oximetry saturation > 92%. Failure was defined as the need for invasive ventilation. Results: initial mean values on Fi02 lwith: NIV: Pa02/Fi02 120, respiratory rate (RR) 32, pH 7.23, PaC02 64 - CPAP: Pa02/Fi02 109, RR 32, pH 7.19, PaC02 62. After 60 minutes of NIV/CPAP improvement was statistically significant in both groups: NIV: Pa02/Fi02 189. RR 25, pH 7.31, PaC02 55 - CPAP: Pa02/Fi02 168. RR 26, pH 7.29, PaC02 51; p <0.05 in all groups. All pts that underwent NIV survived and no one required invasive ventilation, while, in the CPAPgroup,2 pts (8%) died and 3 pts (12%) required invasive ventilation for no improvement after CPAP trial. Duration of ventilation and length of stay were similar in both groups (p=ns). Percentage of myocardial ischemia (NSTEMI) were similar: 5/27 pts (18%) with NSTEMI were successfully treated with NIV, 4 of these showed increased cardiac markers or ECG alterations before NIV trealment. 6/25 pts (24%) with NSTEMI were successfully treated with CPAP, 4 showed ECG or enzymatic alterations on admission. Condusion: both CPAP and NIV can result in early physiological improvement and are effective treatments in pts with ACPE; NIV especially can reduce the need for endotracheal intubation and invasive ventilation. The proportion of myocardial ischemia was similar in the two groups; we found no association between NIV and myocardial infarction. 0 16- Airway/Respiratory Emergencies Success rate of airway management by residents in a prehospital emergency setting: a retrospective study Albrecht E, Yersin B, Hugli O, Spahn DR, Fishman D Emergency Department and Anesthesiology Department, University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland Objectíve: The objectives of this retrospective study were to assess i) the success rate of prehospital patient airway management by residents according to a standardized protocol and ii) the success of oral endotracheal intubation (ETI) in a level I trauma center. Methods: Our level 1 emergency and trauma center has performed 13,537 prehospital medical interventions in the last 5 years (1996- 2001). The minimal required training for residents rotating in the prehospital emergency team was either 1 year in a university anesthesiology department or an internal medicine resident having performed 20 ETI under supervision in the operating room. Defined indications for oral endotracheal intubation are: (1) head trauma with GCS < 8 (2) severe facial trauma (3) multiply injured patient with shock (SBP < 90 mmHg) (4) burn patient with inhalation syndrome (5) respiratory failure (RR > 35/min and saturation < 90 % (6) cardiac arrest. I) Among 13,537 medical records. 1,252 patients met the criteria 14 Læknablaðið/Fylgirit 45 2002/88

x

Læknablaðið : fylgirit

Beinir tenglar

Ef þú vilt tengja á þennan titil, vinsamlegast notaðu þessa tengla:

Tengja á þennan titil: Læknablaðið : fylgirit
https://timarit.is/publication/991

Tengja á þetta tölublað:

Tengja á þessa síðu:

Tengja á þessa grein:

Vinsamlegast ekki tengja beint á myndir eða PDF skjöl á Tímarit.is þar sem slíkar slóðir geta breyst án fyrirvara. Notið slóðirnar hér fyrir ofan til að tengja á vefinn.