Archaeologia Islandica - 01.01.2004, Page 95

Archaeologia Islandica - 01.01.2004, Page 95
ICELANDIC FARMHOUSE EXCAVATIONS: FlELD METHODS AND SITE CHOICES significant difference is that at Kúabót the floors were excavated. This resulted in a much greater number of artefacts and also in observations about the history of use of each building. In some cases more than one floor layer was distinguished and recorded. This represents an impor- tant shift in the perceived goal of an archaeological excavation. Instead of aiming to reveal a building at its point of - preferably hasty - abandonment, the emphasis was now on revealing the building at its point of construction, thus including in the excavation the removal of occupation layers and at least minor repairs. From a theoretical point of view this is a significant change. It reflects a growing realisation among fíeldworkers that an archaeological site is the result of complicated developments and not a stat- ic phenomenon. It is also a more sophis- ticated approach to the goal of revealing the building as it really was. For the evo- lutionary archaeologist it certainly makes more sense to try to describe the building as it was originally intended than in its fmal form, after perhaps decades of wear, and tear, modifications and repairs. Reading archaeological reports from the 1970s and 1980s it is difficult to see that the sections really did improve the stratigraphic analysis. Conceptually all these sites were dug in plan: the plans are the principal - and most easily compre- hensible - evidence of what was found, and it was during the excavations in plan that the main stratigraphic units - always whole buildings or building phases - were defined. The sections - normally drawn towards the end of the process when most of the defínitions had already been made - were a back-up, the real sig- nificance of which was to give the exca- vators confidence to proceed through complicated stratigraphy. The sections allowed deposits to be removed without them being fully understood. The section revealed by the removal would clarify the matter. Which in a sense is always true: a section will always tell a story - it is just not certain if it reflects the story of the site formation. The limitations of this approach were beginning to become visible in the late 1980s. In large scale excavations of sites with deep stratigraphies like Stóraborg, Viðey and Bessastaðir excavators were beginning to worry about a number of issues: - The accurate location of artefacts was disproportionately related to meaning- ful stratigraphic units. Artefacts found in floor layers or fills of buildings could be ascribed to that stratigraphic unit, whereas those found undemeath floor layers or in middens not clearly associated with a particular building could not be given a meaningful loca- tional reference, except at best relative to something else. The records of such relationships were also often only placed in artefact descriptions, not on the plans or sections. At Stóraborg the location of artefacts was to begin with recorded in x, y and z but this accuracy was in no way matched with the accuracy of the stratigraphic record - the co-ordinates of artefacts could not always be relat- ed to particular plans or sections - and this time consuming practice was therefore ceased. - Increasingly detailed excavation and 93
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148

x

Archaeologia Islandica

Direct Links

If you want to link to this newspaper/magazine, please use these links:

Link to this newspaper/magazine: Archaeologia Islandica
https://timarit.is/publication/1160

Link to this issue:

Link to this page:

Link to this article:

Please do not link directly to images or PDFs on Timarit.is as such URLs may change without warning. Please use the URLs provided above for linking to the website.