1959, Vol. XIX, Blaðsíða 72

B and b are not derived from Fr3: there are cases where B and b have a better text, and also a few examples of lesser changes in Fr3 which are not found in B and

1959, Vol. XIX, Blaðsíða 42

and b do not agree.

1959, Vol. XIX, Blaðsíða 73

In the latter case, vdru is definitely a better reading, and if the MS from which b was copied had eru, a sensible scribe would probably correct it as a matter

1959, Vol. XIX, Blaðsíða 43

Thus B would have the chapters in the same order as b.

1959, Vol. XIX, Blaðsíða 34

No. 180 d, fol. in the same collection, a paper MS written not long before 1700: this is the MS called B by Unger.

1959, Vol. XIX, Blaðsíða 33

The rest of this MS is preserved in no. 180 b, fol., and contains a number of romantic sagas and Saints’ Lives. 180 b, fol. begins with Konråds saga k eis aras

1959, Vol. XIX, Blaðsíða 52

Branch I has no separate title in the one MS (B) which has preserved the first chapter53.

1959, Vol. XIX, Blaðsíða 67

This may mean that the absence of this and subsequent episodes in our MSS B and b is accidental, due to the loss of a leaf or more in a MS from which both B and

1959, Vol. XIX, Blaðsíða 145

145 t>å komu 12 jafningjar a; J)å kom Rollant ok Olifer ok 12 jafningjar B; J>ar våru J)å meS konungi 12 jafningjar b; jieir er Karlamagnus konungr hafSi mikla

1959, Vol. XIX, Blaðsíða 107

b. Repetitions, anticipations of things that are going to happen, Meissner, pp. 263-64. c. Long lists of unimportant names, Meissner p. 157. B.