The White Falcon


The White Falcon - 06.03.1943, Blaðsíða 4

The White Falcon - 06.03.1943, Blaðsíða 4
4 THE WHITE FALCON OUR FORCE - ALWAYS ALERT Published by and for the American Forces, under the super- vision of G-2 Section. Managing Editor, T/3G. Gene Graff; Asso- ciate Editor, T/5G. Joseph T. Koren; News Editor, T/5G. George Bartholomaeus; Art Editor, T/4G. Harrison Standley; Wire Edi- tor, Pvt. Orlando Aguero; Circulation Manager, Pfc. Anthony J. Schulte. All photographs are by the U.S. Army Signal Corps un- less otherwise credited. This paper has been passed by Censor and may be mailed home for one cent. Bombing Of Berlin The devastating bombing blitz of Berlin earlier this week is far more significant than merely to indicate that the U.S. Air Force and RAF staged a successful assault on the German capital. The damage was severe and thoroughly bewildered the populace, which had been “assured” by glib-tongued Hitler that Allied plan- es never would be able to trickle through Berlin’s “in- vulnerable defenses.” More encouraging than the results of one night’s act- ivity is the evidence that air initiative over Europe has been won by the Allies. No longer , is Hitler’s terror- dominated territory fearful of Nazi air power as 'a means of repelling the anticipated “second front” of- fensive if, and when, it lashes out for the knockout blow. The skies are now virtually cleared for come what may. Berlin’s punishment, alone, might be interpreted as a gesture to frighten German civilians. But when it follows in the wake of wide-scale jolting sorties over the vital core of industrial Europe, Hiller can’t possibly make futile excuses to shake off the approaching disaster. When hundreds of planes, carrying lethal cargoes of high explosives, can strike at Germany’s heart with accuracy and comparative safety, the legend of Luft- waffe supremacy is a faint memory of the days be- fore the Allies rolled up their sleeves and waded into the decisive stage of World War II. And Hiller must be frantic to explain to his war- weary civilians why they must take time from their customary activities to clean the streets of Berlin. That, so he told them, “could never happen to us.” That’s like the fight manager who rasped into his fighter’s ear between rounds: “Go in there and fight. He can’t hurt us.” 1 “But I tell you it’s no longer necessary to keep notifying your draft board of your whereabouts.” 7Ae. Jnquihinq. QeptVit&i (The Inquiring Reporter, hear- ing that many of the AEF here plan to get married when the war is over, “popped the baby question” this week.) T/5G. Andrew Yokovitch, 28, Infantry, ex- plained that he and his girl were married just be- fore he left for overseas duty. He smiled bash- fully and said, “1 think it would be nice to have three boys.” “Andy” formerly was a steel worker in his home town of E. Chicago, Ill. Second Lieut. Eleanor Merrick, ANC, from Leo- minster, Mass., asserted, “Nurs- ing is a career with me and I never gave babi- es much thought, but I think three children would make an ideal family.” Miss Merrick worked at the Boston Memorial Hospital before entering the Army two years ago. ”11 doesn’l matter much to me,” declared Pvt. Jessie Bell, 23, Infantry, quickly adding, “children don’t fit into my plans for the future.” Jess admitted that he thought one girl would probably be all right though. With a far-away look in his eyes, Pvt. Wal- lace Cook, 22, Medics, said, “Two children, a boy and a girl, would be just W right, but I might comprom- ise on a girl.” Cook comes from Scranton, Pa., where he was a ; truck driver. Tell ’em it’s raining daffodils, Adolf!” They Say.... CHAPLAIN’S CHALLENGE “As a man thinketh in his heart, so is he.” Many hold the erroneous idea that material accomplish- ments alone serve as a baro- meter of the character. In truth, the nature of a person is recognizable in his very ap- pearance. Frequently, a minor trait or a trivial habit reveals the man in a joke, an expres- sion, or an incident. Peculari- ties often suggest the explan- ation for some major feature. Character is always interpret- ed by the symptoms of a per- son’s behavior. “Nowhere is character more clearly reveal- ed than under duress, in dang- er, or removed from the fam- iliar supports of home and country.” ERNEST FOSTER.—Lov,emak- ing technique of Hollywood’s matinee idols may be all right for them, but don’t try to imit- ate it. Actor John Payne readily ad- mits he made this mistake. He went through agonies until he discovered that the best love- making system is the easiest. Now Payne is romancing with Sonja Henie for the second time in their current 20th Century- Fox picture. “At the beginning of a screen actor’s career,” Payne relates, “he is attacked by embarrass- ment and self-consciousness when he has to kiss and make love to a famous leading lady. “The first and most natural thing he does is the biggest mis- take he can make—he tries to imitate the romantic technique of some famous star.” When Payne tried to copy the clinch of a romantic male star which the audiences had ap- plauded in the original, it led to one of his most embarrass- ing moments in pictures. The female star, whom Payne pre- fers to leave unnamed, turned to him and said with a note of derision: “Are you kidding?” DAMON RUNYON.—It is im- possible to ordain songs to pop- ularity with the public, as OWI valiantly tried to do, asserting — not without some justification — that many of the war ditties of the day were just slush. OWl’s idea was that the song writers ought to put their muses to the grindstone and turn out things that would reflect the seriousness of war and a lot of writers really leveled and gave their very best all along that line, some of the songs being commended by OWL But in most cases the cantankerous public has turned deaf ears to both words and music. Our folks just naturally insist on singing what they like. The lyrics of a song may be com- pletely banal and the music an offense to highdoned. sensibili- ties, but if the people like the song they are going to sing it and that is all there is to it. Often the people pick songs that are pretty good from any stand- point. My esteemed contemporary, “Variety,” which knows more about popular songs and song writers and the song business generally than any other public print in existence, remarked last week that the current crop of disk releases “Again points up the old Tin Pan Alley adage that you can’t scienlificize the pro- duction of hits; that they just happen and no expert can pre- dict which will prove a hit.” Which just corroborates my argument. DOROTHY KILGALLEN. — (The Column’s Fourth Annivers- ary).—I was in the audience when Billy Gaxton and Victor Moore tried to revive vaudeville, and now I wish some musical comedy producers would revive Gaxton and Moore .... I cov- ered the opening night at El Morocco the year John Perona decided to make it look like a pink velvet birthday cake, and 1 think I was the first to re- commend that he bring back the old zebra stripes and red-hot stars .... It was in my era as a Broadway columnist that Ethel Marco changed partners, Garbo laughed, and Chaplin forgot to. The face of Broadway has changed. When I first began to write about it, it was a blind- ing bright street that never grew dark until dawn, when the cbor- (Continued on Page 8)

x

The White Falcon

Beinir tenglar

Ef þú vilt tengja á þennan titil, vinsamlegast notaðu þessa tengla:

Tengja á þennan titil: The White Falcon
https://timarit.is/publication/382

Tengja á þetta tölublað:

Tengja á þessa síðu:

Tengja á þessa grein:

Vinsamlegast ekki tengja beint á myndir eða PDF skjöl á Tímarit.is þar sem slíkar slóðir geta breyst án fyrirvara. Notið slóðirnar hér fyrir ofan til að tengja á vefinn.