Reykjavík Grapevine - 06.05.2011, Qupperneq 21

Reykjavík Grapevine - 06.05.2011, Qupperneq 21
21 The Reykjavík Grapevine Issue 5 — 2011 Preserving quality is our business Open daily for lunch and dinners Special off er on Monday and Tuesday – 3 course dinner for only 4200 ISK. Reservation: tel. 552 5700, e-mail: gallery@holt.is Bergstaðastræti 37 s. 552 5700 holt@holt.is www.holt.is Elegant surroundings Superb cuisine Modern comfort Vegetarian Fish Deserts Cream of lobster soup Garlic roasted lobster Lobster & escargot “ragout” Mushrooms, garlic Whale “sashimi” dip sauce Mushrooms, herbs, ginger, red beets Lobster “maki” Avocado, mango, cucumber, chilli mayo Lobster salad Rucola, pumpkin seeds, fruit chutney Veggie steak Red beets, potatoes, parsnip Catch of the day Please ask your waiter Lobster grill 200 gr. lobster, horseradish, salad Chocolate “2 ways” White and dark chocolade, fruits “Lazy-daisy” Coconut, yoghurt Lunch Humarhúsið the lobster house R E S T A U R A N T AMTMANNSTÍGUR BANKASTRÆTI BÓKHLÖÐUSTÍGUR LÆ K JA RG A TA SKÓLABRÚ SK Ó LA ST R Æ TI 1 R ey kj av ik Ju n io r C o ll eg e Located in City Center Amtmannsstíg 1 · 101 Reykjavík · Tel: 561 3303 humarhusid@humarhusid.is speak. Everything from the lighting to the way it sits on the harbour front, the things related to the outside... all these discussions we’ve had... I don’t know any examples of an artist and an archi- tect team collaborating so closely. When the project started I was cu- rious to see if this was even possible, and now, nearing the successful com- pletion of it, I feel incredibly proud to have worked with such a great team of people on creating this dynamic proj- ect. The coming together of all these different individuals and ideas has made the seemingly impossible pos- sible. THE DEVIL IN THE DETAILS How is it working on such a large-scale project with many involved partners? Have you had to make more compromises than usual? No. I think the people I have worked with can verify that I have been very insistent on making clear what is art and what isn’t. I believe there is no limit to what can be considered important about a work of art, and my team in Berlin is well known for being—without it sounding negative—obsessed with detail. It basi- cally goes relentlessly into every detail of any of our projects. Sometimes an engineer or an architect will come up with a better solution that also works better artistically. What makes it a work of art is not necessarily that I did it; it is the outcome of a dialogue that ren- ders the artistic idea stronger or bet- ter, and I think it’s important to keep an eye out for why you’re doing what you’re doing. When you are obsessed, you tend to focus on how things are done. Very often the why and how go hand in hand. Sometimes you’ll get so obsessed with understanding the is- sue that you forget why you’re doing it in the first place, and I think working on these large scale projects brings out the artistic strength. Tell me about some of the de- tails that concerned you... I looked a lot into the difference be- tween the colour palette of the north and south sides of the façade. The coloured glass integrates different co- lours from inside and outside, which resemble colours you find when you look at different types of light and min- erals. They reference a sense of geol- ogy. I worked with glass specialists to develop the right colour, and they of course might have an opinion about what looks good and what looks wrong. I had to ensure their opinions didn’t influence the course of the proj- ect. The glassmaker will also have an opinion and even the person that in- stalls the glass. I have to make sure to monitor every step of the process and see that it comes to fruition in the way it was envisioned. A PARTICULAR ICELANDER But I don’t do this alone. The design team and the architects have been very helpful, and my own team has been working with me since the very first stages in my studio. I would also like to mention one Icelander in par- ticular, who works in my studio, an art- ist and architect called Einar Þorsteinn. I think he has an exhibition opening in Iceland soon, which I urge all to visit [more on Einar Þorsteinn’s Hafnarborg exhibit in our listings issue]. Einar has lived most of his life in Iceland and he has an incredible mind for experimental thinking; he is a won- derful person. He has collaborated with me on almost thirty different proj- ects—our first project together was back in 1996—always inserting a sort of crystalline or arithmetic or math- ematic parabola geometry. I know that he’s returning to Iceland and expects to spend more time working in Iceland over the next years. He and I developed the early stages of the geometry from which the ‘quasi bricks’ that make up the south façade evolved. The bricks themselves are not, as a matter of fact, meant to reflect the Icelandic basalt columns as some have speculated, but the idea of the intricate language of mathematics. This polyhe- dric form has relevance in the world, and I have used it in a lot of differ- ent projects. I’ve benefited a lot from Einar’s insight in making shapes and geometries. Making the bricks was a very sophisticated process. By the time the brick gets to Iceland, maybe fifty different people have been involved with thinking about it—how every an- gle reacts to different shades of light, strain, mechanics, etc. The very early beginning stage involved Einar sitting and thinking about mathematics, and the last stage was a worker sitting in a crane. And I follow every step of the way. Tell me more about Einar Þor- steinn. What is his role in your art? Einar was a visionary when I met him in Iceland during the mid nineties. He lived and worked by Álafoss in Mos- fellsbær, and had already done a lot of different and impressive things by then. At the time, I was very interested in [the world renowned engineer/de- signer/futurist] Buckminster Fuller and was working with a couple of his ge- ometries... I contacted Einar because I was working on creating a sculpture using Buckminster’s mathematical system and somebody in Denmark pointed out Einar, remarking that he, unlike Buckminster, was alive and working. I went and met him and I found him to be a visionary. Personally, I was a bit surprised that Iceland had not further embraced him and his work and in- tegrated him into a bigger role. I later learned that the entire class he studied with in Stuttgart had gone on to be- come professors or highly respected professionals. A few years later Einar married a German woman and moved to Ger- many. I immediately offered him a job at my studio and this was the begin- ning of a long relationship involving a lot of projects. We worked on a book together and are planning on making another one that will revolve around our collaborations. A CONSTANT DIALOGUE I am very interested in re-evaluating the spatial systems in which we work and the way we view architecture, landscape and ourselves; in chang- ing our perception of reality because I think reality is highly constructed. Einar has these ideas about different types of reality—which he should really be telling you about. He has an incred- ible mind; fundamentally he has a lot of confidence in the idea that there are other ways of doing things. This is such an important human quality, fos- tering the idea that there must be an alternative to how we do things. This has become rare and this is why I think Einar is truly unique. In most societies people who work and think like that are often marginalised, especially if they are opinionated. If you think dif- ferently from the masses, you have to be an incredible diplomat; it is not an easy route, especially in a place like Iceland. Einar is part of my core studio team, where each person plays a different role. I have been very explicit about the part my studio plays as a workplace, laboratory and haven for experimenta- tion. My studio is not a place of isola- tion, but very much involves a constant dialogue with the team and with the surroundings in Berlin. Harpa: Key Facts and Stats: Harpa’s name comes from the English in- strument, the harp, and the name of the month that marks the beginning of summer in the Old Norse calendar. Harpa has four main concert halls in- spired by the elements fire, air, water, and earth, which are called, respectively, El- dborg (Fire Castle), Norðurljós (Northern Lights), Silfurberg (Iceland spar, a rare translucent calcite crystal), and Kaldalón (Cold Lagoon). Eldborg is the grand con- cert hall, and it seats 1.800 people. With state of the art equipment and spacious exhibition and reception areas, conference facilities seat up to 1.600. Harpa is home to the Iceland Sym- phony Orchestra and the Icelandic Opera. It will serve as home base for Iceland Air- waves 2011. The building façade is designed by re- nowned artist Ólafur Elíasson in collabora- tion with Henning Larsen Architects. The building is designed by Henning Larsen Architects and Batteríið Architects, and the acoustics are designed by Artec Con- sultants Inc. Construction commenced on Janu- ary 12, 2007. During construction, 200.000 square metres of earth was cleared out and 6 million tonnes of ocean water were pumped from the building site Size: 28.000 square metres Height: 43 metres Materials used: 30.000 cubic metres concrete 100 tonnes of glass Cost: 27 billion ISK (includes cost of financing over the next 35 years loans while the loans are paid off)

x

Reykjavík Grapevine

Direct Links

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Reykjavík Grapevine
https://timarit.is/publication/943

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.