Reykjavík Grapevine - 05.06.2015, Blaðsíða 6

Reykjavík Grapevine - 05.06.2015, Blaðsíða 6
6 The Reykjavík Grapevine Issue 1 — 20116 The Reykjavík GrapevineIssue 7 — 2015 Politics | The art of the possible The Icelandic Environment Association and the Iceland Nature Conservation Association (INCA) recently held a con- ference to bring together a diverse group of people to discuss the value of Iceland’s Highlands. Arguably the most interest- ing thing to come out of the conference was an attendee’s estimate that the High- lands were worth 80 billion ISK. Sigurður Jóhannesson came up with the figure by extrapolating the findings of German economist David Bothe, who, in 2003, asked a sample of 1,000 Iceland- ers how much more they would be will- ing to pay for electricity in exchange for leaving the Highlands around Kárahn- júkar dam in East Iceland untouched. He found, with a response rate of 33.6%, that Icelanders considered the economic value of the land, untouched, to be two billion ISK. Taking into consideration the rise in the Consumer Price Index, and the fact that the total size of the Highlands is some 20 times larger than the area around Kárahnjúkar, Sigurður argued the highlands were worth at least 80 bil- lion ISK. This calculation marks the first step towards a cost-benefit analysis in the discussion of conservation versus differ- ent uses of Icelandic nature. Since 2000, new projects must go through an envi- ronmental impact assessment, and the energy companies perform economic feasibility studies, but to date no attempts have been made to compare the econom- ic benefits of different land uses. With growing tourism this question is becoming more pressing. As Chair of the INCA board Árni Finnsson points out, it has become more obvious that electric- ity generation for industry, especially large aluminum smelters, adds remark- ably little to the Icelandic economy. “The tourism industry has grown by leaps and bounds,” he says, “too fast for the author- ities to respond adequately, and to ensure that the natural resource which attracts all the tourists is protected.” Considering the growth of tourism in recent years, some have argued that the 80 billion figure is a low estimate. Although contingent valuation is widely used in assessments of environmental damage in the US, such studies require a very careful design and more than 327 re- sponses. Moreover, it seems questionable that one can simply multiply the findings from Bothe, as Sigurður does. The value of the Highlands is more than just the sum of its parts. Moreover, any evalua- tion of the highlands must take into con- sideration the explosive growth of the tourism industry in the past few years. Especially considering the fact that in 2014 the export earnings from tour- ism were 303 billion ISK, and since 80% of tourists name the natural beauty of Iceland as their main reason for visiting, it seems reasonable to assume the annual contribution of the Highlands to Icelan- dic GDP might be close to 80 billion. Others, however, have questioned the whole premise of assigning any kind of price tag to untouched wilderness. In response to the idea that the Highlands are worth 80 billion ISK, Andri Snær Magnason, a best-selling author and environmental activist, wrote on his Facebook page: “Tell me how much your grandmother costs per pound, the square meter of your sweetheart and then calcu- late the value of your best friend in cars. Before you do that I don’t know what cur- rency to use.’” Words by Magnús Sveinn Helgason Can We Place A Price Tag On The Central Highlands? The installation was built to highlight the immigration issues in Iceland, a relatively new occurrence in the country, and also to bring up the debate about Muslim in- tegration in Europe—specifically in the Italian city of Venice, a place tied to Islam through trade throughout the centuries but still void of a mosque in its historic centre. The controversy surrounding the installation, and the intersections of poli- tics, art and religion, has only increased the piece’s efficacy. “The Mosque” as security threat “Before the Charlie Hebdo attacks, we came to Venice and had some discussions with privately owned churches and they were quite positive, but after the attacks all the doors were closed,” said Nína Magnúsdóttir, Cristoph’s wife and cura- tor of the installation. “Nobody wanted to get involved. The Muslim community in Venice was the opposite. When we approached them initially they were a bit suspicious. What do you really want with us? Why are you approaching us for this? After the Charlie Hebdo attacks, they made a decision within their com- munity that this was a very timely project and they wanted to participate. They just went full force and got into this project.” Venetian officials first wrote to the Icelandic Pavilion at the festival, dis- couraging the installation, titled “The Mosque,” suggesting it would inspire violence from anti-Islamic extremists, or Islamic extremists—it was unclear as to who the perpetrator(s) would be, in this scenario. This was due to “the current international situation.” The building lo- cation itself was also deemed difficult to monitor. Nína and Cristoph decided to keep building the installation. “We anticipated that there would be some reaction, but this is a lot, to say the least,” said Nína. “It was integral from the start to integrate the Muslim communi- ties in Iceland and Venice and totally nec- essary for the project to be able to happen. It was very difficult to locate the space for the project. It had to be a space of worship to overlay the history and culture and re- ligion in a public space or a church. The Muslim elements had to visually speak to us—finding this place was very hard.” “The Mosque” as consecrated ground The building, Santa Maria della Miseri- cordia, has been unused and privately owned since 1973. The Venetian diocese made claims that the church wasn’t of- ficially deconsecrated and authorization would be required for anything other than “Christian worship.” “The Catholic church trying to claim the building is still a religious space is all bullshit,” said Nína. “It’s not. We had to locate this document, which was quite hard. Here in Italy, when we tried to find the documents in the archive, the archive was on the move, so we couldn’t access the archive. We had some good friends help us.” The document decrees the church, Santa Maria della Misericordia, decon- secrated. This document was signed by Albino Luciana, who later became Pope John Paul I, known as Il Papa del Sorriso, The Smiling Pope. He died only 33 days after his election at a time of political and religious unrest in Italy. According to The Guardian, on the night of his death he was lamenting the shooting of young men reading outside a Communist Party headquarters by neo-Fascists. “Even the young are killing each other,” he said. “The Mosque” as over-attended The strangest claim by Venetian officials is that the mosque was being attended by too many people at a time, exceeding legal limits. The Icelandic Arts Centre, the organization presenting the national pavilion, responded in a press release that “occupancy of the Pavilion has been tracked consistently by staff and has, af- ter the opening day, never gone above 100 people at one time.” “We’ve had counters at the door the entire time,” said Björg Stefánsdot- tír, director of The Icelandic Arts Cen- ter. “When the police came to do these checks, they had never given us a ticket. Our guard had been called to the police station for an interrogation, and when he asked for proof that he’d been interrogat- ed the police told him they didn’t need to give him anything.” “The Mosque” as a place of worship When the mosque was finally shut down, the objection was that the installation was not art, but a place of worship. The Venetian officials are requiring the Ice- landic Arts Center to reapply to use the building as a place of worship. “This is a mosque, but it’s not a mosque,” said Björg. “It looks real and is ‘real,’ but it’s not real. It’s art. When the exhibition is finished it will be taken down and the installation will be over.” People attending the mosque were never required to take off their shoes or, in the case of women, wear veils. These things were suggested and veils were available, but it was not enforced. “It’s also very much an educational space. The Muslim community and other associations engaged in a dialogue,” said Nína. “Within the Muslim community in Venice, there are 29 nations. Mohamed Amin Al Ahdab, president of the Islamic Community of Venice, suggested that each nation could per- form and present their culture.” At the opening cer- emonies, according to the New York Times, “Pakistan’s ambas- sador to Italy, publicly thanked Mr. Büchel and the project’s cura- tor, Nina Magnúsdóttir, for ‘a place of worship, a place of art, a place where communities can come together and talk.’” Iceland’s Muslim community has been behind the installation from the beginning, with the President of the Muslim community in Iceland, Salman Tamimi, giving guided tours throughout the installation in Venice. “We wanted language courses with Arabic teachings and, hopefully, Icelan- dic—if there was an interest for it,” said Nína. “Mosques, within Muslim commu- nities, are called Islamic Cultural Cen- tres. There is a lot more than just prayer practised within these institutions. There is a lot of teaching and lectures going on. We hoped to have inter-faith discussions as well.” The installation ran for weeks with- out any incident, but unless it gets rein- stated none of these plans for language instruction, inter-faith dialogue, or gen- eral education will be possible. But does this represent Iceland? “Christoph is Swiss,” said Björg. “He lives in Iceland. His wife is Icelandic. His son is Icelandic. He’s been here for the last eight years.” He was commissioned by the Ice- landic Arts Centre to represent Iceland in Venice. The small Muslim community in Iceland—the Muslim Community Centre counts 389 members—has had issues get- ting a mosque of their own. “There is a very small Muslim com- munity in Iceland,” said Nína. “After 12 years of fighting, it has finally gotten permission to build a mosque. Coming to Venice, with all its history to the East, with all its connections to the Ottoman Empire, and visually you see traces of the East all over in the architecture as well, there has never been a mosque in Ven- ice. That was the starting point for this piece.” In Iceland, a mosque was approved to be built and granted a plot of land by the City of Reykjavík. Running for City Council in the latest elections, Progres- sive Party member Sveinbjörg Birna S vei nbjör s dót t i r claimed she would reverse the city’s de- cision to give a plot of land to the Muslim community. This led to the Progressive Party winning two seats on City Coun- cil. After the elec- tion she decided she would not oppose the construction of the mosque, and anyone who voted for her because of that had “bet on the wrong horse.” In Venice, strong opposition to Cris- toph’s installation “The Mosque” came from Venetian mayoral candidate Luigi Brugnaro. He described the installation as a “mistaken initiative, which was done without taking into account people’s feel- ings in Venice.” “Basically, we’re just dealing with censorship,” said Björg. “There are so many things that have been affecting this. The municipality of Venice has been run without a mayor for the last year. Our permission might depend on who is voted in two weeks from now. The more right wing candidate, Luigi Brugnaro, got 38% of the vote on June 1, with the more liber- al candidate, Felice Casson, getting 28%. It wasn’t a majority, so there will be an- other election in two weeks. Casson is the candidate who supported 'The Mosque' by saying praying in public spaces is com- pletely legal and you can pray in any faith right in St. Mark’s Square—anywhere in public space.” A surface comparison of the two situations appears to complement, if not verify, the motivation behind Christoph’s “The Mosque” installation. The artist set out to highlight hypocrisy and intoler- ance in Iceland, only to cause the same in Venice. A municipal election and right- wing candidate piggybacked on local in- securities about Islam for political gain. As an art installation “The Mosque” has achieved something: Life imitating art. On Friday May 22, Venetian police closed Iceland’s con- tribution to the Venice Biennale, a functioning mosque installed in a deconsecrated church in the heart of Venice. The issues surrounding the installation have varied from security risk to religious clashing to building permits and fire codes. In Iceland, there has even been nationalis- tic criticism of the ethnic identity of the artist, Cristoph Büchel: is he Swiss or Icelandic? Words by York Underwood Photos by Bjarni Grímsson Life Imitating Art Iceland’s “Mosque” installation in Venice “We anticipated that there would be some reaction, but this is a lot, to say the least.”
Blaðsíða 1
Blaðsíða 2
Blaðsíða 3
Blaðsíða 4
Blaðsíða 5
Blaðsíða 6
Blaðsíða 7
Blaðsíða 8
Blaðsíða 9
Blaðsíða 10
Blaðsíða 11
Blaðsíða 12
Blaðsíða 13
Blaðsíða 14
Blaðsíða 15
Blaðsíða 16
Blaðsíða 17
Blaðsíða 18
Blaðsíða 19
Blaðsíða 20
Blaðsíða 21
Blaðsíða 22
Blaðsíða 23
Blaðsíða 24
Blaðsíða 25
Blaðsíða 26
Blaðsíða 27
Blaðsíða 28
Blaðsíða 29
Blaðsíða 30
Blaðsíða 31
Blaðsíða 32
Blaðsíða 33
Blaðsíða 34
Blaðsíða 35
Blaðsíða 36
Blaðsíða 37
Blaðsíða 38
Blaðsíða 39
Blaðsíða 40
Blaðsíða 41
Blaðsíða 42
Blaðsíða 43
Blaðsíða 44
Blaðsíða 45
Blaðsíða 46
Blaðsíða 47
Blaðsíða 48
Blaðsíða 49
Blaðsíða 50
Blaðsíða 51
Blaðsíða 52
Blaðsíða 53
Blaðsíða 54
Blaðsíða 55
Blaðsíða 56
Blaðsíða 57
Blaðsíða 58
Blaðsíða 59
Blaðsíða 60

x

Reykjavík Grapevine

Beinir tenglar

Ef þú vilt tengja á þennan titil, vinsamlegast notaðu þessa tengla:

Tengja á þennan titil: Reykjavík Grapevine
https://timarit.is/publication/943

Tengja á þetta tölublað:

Tengja á þessa síðu:

Tengja á þessa grein:

Vinsamlegast ekki tengja beint á myndir eða PDF skjöl á Tímarit.is þar sem slíkar slóðir geta breyst án fyrirvara. Notið slóðirnar hér fyrir ofan til að tengja á vefinn.