Fjölrit RALA - 05.12.1999, Page 89

Fjölrit RALA - 05.12.1999, Page 89
RALA Reportno. 200 Rangeland degradation in Ordos Plateau, its nature and assessment Jia Jiong Department of Geography, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China Tel: 86 10 623202 76: Fax: 86 10625881 27: E-mail: jiajiong@moon.bjnet.edu.cn ABSTRACT The Ordos Plateau has a markedly higher percentage (more than 70%) of degraded rangelands than the regions in the same latitude, primarily because of the frequent fluctuation of climate and the heavier grazing pressure, combined with the exploring for fuelwood and pharmaceutical plants and the conversion to farmland. Desert steppe in the area was examined for effects of hundreds years of livestock grazing and other disturbances. Three permanent sites, including a series of opened plots, light grazing plots and ungrazed plots (excluded or ‘closed’ from livestock), were designed in 1988 to compare and examine the degradation of rangeland under different grazing pressure. Experimental analysis showed that there was a change of vegetation biomass, botanical composition, species diver- sity, soil moisture and other factors after different grazing treatment. Biomass of most species in- creased in the light grazing and the ungrazed plots after two years. Total aboveground biomass ranged from 117.6 g/m2 in the light grazing plots to 134.1 g/m2 in the closed plots, compared with 42.3 g/m2 in the opened plots. But in the seventh year aboveground biomass at the ungrazed plots b ame 13.2 g/m2 less than that in the light grazing plots. Species diversity (Shannon-Wiener Index) wí ughest in the ungrazed plots (2.207), followed by the light grazing plots (1.892) and the opened plots s0.826) in the seventh year. Botanical composition also changed after seven years of treatment. The semi-shrub Artemisia songorica, dominant in opened plots, was virtually eliminated in light grazing plots where the perennial grass Cleistogenes squarrosa became dominant. Later it was still in abundance at the ungrazed plots, but the dominance had been replaced by another perennial grass Stipa breviflora. The soils in the opened plots had lower moisture and higher bulk density than the other plots. Time series analysis showed that yearly mean overgrazing rate is lower than 20%, even negative in some cases. However, when rainfall became less than average, stocking rates were far beyond the carrying capac- ity and vegetation was severely damaged. It is suggested that the constancy of stocking rate has been the main reason for regional rangeland degradation. Consequently, adjustment of stocking rate ac- cording to climate (rainfall) driven fluctuation in carrying capacity is very important for the rangeland restoration in the area. Key words: cumulative grazing impact, degradation, desert steppe, Ordos Plateau, rangeland, stock- ing rate. INTRODUCTION Rangeland degradation may be defined as the loss of utility or potential utility or the reduction, loss or change of features of rangeland ecosystem which cannot be replaced (Chrisholm and Dumsday 1987). In general, rangeland degradation implies a reduc- tion in rank or status, which includes a loss of top-soil, a change to a simple flo- ral/fauna composition or a transition fforn one organic form to a lower organic form, and continuous reduction of productivity/biomass of the ecosystem. Generally speak- ing, a lower biological diversity is supposed to occur in a degraded rangeland, but there is still much research work to be done for the issue. In the view of ecology, deg- radation can be treated as retrogression of an ecosystem, and recovery of degraded rangeland as secondary succession (Numata 1969). The difference between degrada- tion and fluctuation can be found in their temporal scales and resilience (e.g. Archer and Stokes 2000). Once rangeland has been degraded, it is often possible to rehabilitate it and thus re- store it to a level of utility, possibly not as good as its original state, but better than it was in its damaged state (Ludwig and Tongway 2000; Thurow 2000). Given satisfac- tory perception of the threat, funding, technology, and organization, degradation,
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154

x

Fjölrit RALA

Direct Links

If you want to link to this newspaper/magazine, please use these links:

Link to this newspaper/magazine: Fjölrit RALA
https://timarit.is/publication/1497

Link to this issue:

Link to this page:

Link to this article:

Please do not link directly to images or PDFs on Timarit.is as such URLs may change without warning. Please use the URLs provided above for linking to the website.