Bibliotheca Arnamagnæana - 01.06.2003, Síða 295
Acc. 7c, Hs. 94
281
and Paris, B.N. Lat. 1765, 37ra,23-37va,7:
Qui gtiam pa-|stores in illa faciebat regione | uigilare. custodi-
entes uigilias j noctis super gregem suum; ... de quo marcus
ait.| qui'd cum bestiis erat. & angeli mini-|straba«t ei. ut in al-
tero misericordi% insi-|gne.
cf. 3ra,l-3vb,22:
suam reuertitur; hic in po|sterum reuocatus homo.j i« originis
sue iwfanciam j reparatur. Jbi fontem j suum de quo egressa
fue-|rat unda pe/ quirit... De qua ait apøstolws. Littera occid-
it.| (At) ub(i> enim passionis il- (li sacram)enta iungunt«r:|
om(nis eius spirit)uali(ter) amari-|
and Paris, B.N. Lat. 1765, 142ra,9-142va,6:
suam reuertitnr. Hic in posterum reuocatws | homo. in originis
sug infantiaw reparatnr.| Jbi fontem suum de quo egressus
fuerat:| unda perquirit... de qua ait apostolws.| Littera occidit.
At ubi passionis ei sa-|cramenta iunguntwr: omms eius spiri-
tmiiier ama-|ritudo conditnr.
The parallel is not perfect. Line-by-line comparison of the two texts
tums up occasional lexical variants. Acc. 7c, Hs. 94 omits from the
Christmas Office (after 2ra,16) the last half of Greg. Mag., Hom.evang.
I, 8 (= PD I, 24); but the missing section (PL 76, 1104B-1105B) is
included in Paris, B.N. Lat. 1765, 35v,10-36ra,25: “Quid est autem ...
factus est deus homo”. After 30ra,9 Paris, B.N. Lat. 1765 omits three
lines of Origen’s text, and therefore contains no parallel for Acc. 7c, Hs.
94 Iva,15-22: “noluit eam | (traducere ... sicut pius, sicut misericors)”.
Likewise, after 36rb,3 the scribe of Paris, B.N. Lat. 1765 (in keeping
with the tradition of Italian homiliaries discussed above) begins his
selection from Ambrose at Exp.ev.sec.Luc. II, 40, rather than at
Exp.ev.sec.Luc. II, 49, as in Acc. 7c, Hs. 94. However, the scribe of the
Parisian manuscript omits two sections of this text: after 37ra,2, part of
Exp.ev.sec.Luc. II, 42 (CCSL 14, 50.601-608: Nam si orator ... ueri-
tatis suae lumine refulserunt), and after 37ra,23, part of Ambrose,
Exp.ev.sec.Luc. II, 43-49 (CCSL 14, 50.620-53.692: Docuit enim nos
... carnis aetatem), so that the Parisian homiliary does not provide a
parallel for Acc. 7c, Hs. 94 2rb,3-ll: “De matheo pauca p?-e|libauimM5