Reykjavík Grapevine - 26.08.2011, Blaðsíða 12

Reykjavík Grapevine - 26.08.2011, Blaðsíða 12
MEDIEVAL MANUSCRIPTS – Eddas and Sagas The ancient vellums on display. MILLENNIUM – Icelandic art through the ages. Phase one. Starts 23 June. CHILD OF HOPE – Youth and Jón Sigurðsson Tribute to the leader of the independence movement. EXHIBITIONS - GUIDED TOURS CAFETERIA - CULTURE SHOP The Culture House – Þjóðmenningarhúsið National Centre for Cultural Heritage Hverfisgata 15 · 101 Reykjavík (City Centre) Tel: 545 1400 · thjodmenning.is · kultur.is Open daily between 11 am and 5 pm Free guided tour of THE MEDIEVAL MANUSCRIPTS weekdays at 3 pm, except Wednesdays. 12 The Reykjavík Grapevine Issue 13 — 2011 Iceland | Analysis The political debate in Iceland has gotten hor- ribly stale and repetitive. In some places Iceland is held up as being a model of how to survive an economic crises and rebuild society. For most Iceland- ers this seems totally wrong. Some politicians, including our President, like to flaunt this view when they go abroad, but this is definitely not the feeling in Iceland. A GREAT TRANSFER OF WEALTH The situation almost three years after the crash of 2008 is thus: Much of the debts of the Icelandic banks were writ- ten off, there was no other choice, as the total debt was ten times the GDP. There was no other way out—this was not due to any wisdom on part of the nation’s leaders. The bank system has been resurrected, mainly on the back of the population—it is the common people who carry the load. There has been a huge transfer of wealth from the general public to the banks, the pen- sion funds and the owners of capital. According to the latest figures, lending institutions used to own a stake in 30 percent of the private housing in the early 2000s—now they own more than 50 percent. Thus, the people of Iceland are heavily indebted—they keep paying off their mortgages, but they own less and less. Inflation has also been rampant and real wages have collapsed. Iceland is now lagging far behind its Scandi- navian neighbours. There is a steady stream of emigrants, especially to oil rich Norway—which nobody can com- pete with. Icelanders who go to school abroad do not return home after their studies. The reckoning after the collapse still goes on, but it is slow and muddled, creating more frustration than relief. A thorough study by a special committee that was published in April 2010, call- ing for openness and reckoning, seems almost forgotten. A special prosecutor who was nominated after the collapse is researching many cases, but almost none of them have gone to court, ex- cept one, where a judge ruled that the culprits had admittedly swindled their banking institution, but that their crimi- nal intent could not be proven. WHY ICELAND IS NOT A MODEL In two rather famous instances, Ice- land has shown the finger to the world of finance and many feel proud of this. This is possibly the reason the Icelan- dic flag is flown in demonstrations in the Puerta del Sol in Madrid. These are the two referendums on the so-called Icesave repayments, purportedly owed to the British and the Dutch. But ulti- mately this might turn out to be more symbolic than real, there is still a possi- bility that Iceland might lose an interna- tional court case over this, but it seems that the assets of the fallen Landsbanki might cover most of the Icesave claims. Perhaps the threat of Icesave to the economy was overstated. But there is still the myth that Ice- land did not bail out its banks. This is not entirely true. According to an OECD report Iceland has put more money into its failed financial institutions than any other country except Ireland. So in this way Iceland is not a model—the people in Spain need not wave Icelandic flags. THE PUBLIC PAYS We now have a left wing government— elected in the wake of great protests in early 2009—which muddles on, largely following the agenda of the Interna- tional Monetary Fund. But its situation is rather confusing. At the outset it claimed that it would protect our ‘Nor- dic’ welfare system, but it has had to make big cuts in health care. The plan had called for a balanced budget this year, but this will not be the case, so further cuts are needed and there will also be tax increases. Investment has been almost non- existent since the collapse. The Icelan- dic króna, which plummeted to half of its previous value, is still very weak—it is now kept afloat by stringent currency restrictions. This of course means that Iceland gets more revenue from its fish exports and the burgeoning tour- ist industry—in order to pay its debts— but here again the people are paying through lower wages, as well as food and consumer goods that keep getting more expensive. Because of the inher- ent instability of the króna, interest rates are very high, they were recently raised to 4,5 percent—in an economic system where GDP has fallen consider- ably and where only 1,6 percent growth is predicted. No wonder many feel that the króna is a doomed currency. THE GOVERNMENT THAT CANNOT DIE The parties in government are wed- ded to stick together. This is nominally the most left wing government in the country’s history, and if the govern- ment falls there probably won’t be an- other chance for the Social Democrats and the Left Greens to rule together. But the parties are in disagreement on many matters. Three members of parliament from the Left Greens have actually deserted—leaving the govern- ment with the narrowest of majorities. This means that individual MPs, such as Jón Bjarnason, Minister of Fisheries and Agriculture, can take the govern- ment and its agenda hostage. Jón has actively undermined Iceland’s negotia- tions with the EU, much to the dismay of the Social Democrats. Many think that this cannot continue through the winter, that the gov- ernment has little hope of surviving. But then again it has suffered so many blows and beatings that some say it cannot die; that it is trudging onwards like some sort of Zombie Government. When the government was formed two and an half years ago, the Social Democrats—the party of Prime Minis- ter Jóhanna Sigurðardóttir—managed to convince the Left Greens to send an application to join the European Union. Most of the leaders of the Left Greens are against joining the EU, but they agreed on the premise that the case would be settled once and for all in a democratic manner. There would be an agreement that would be put before the nation in a referendum. CALLS FOR TERMINATING NEGO- TIATIONS WITH THE EU Since then matters have become more confusing. The negotiations with the EU might be finished late next year. But support for joining the EU has been waning. Of course the EU is in trouble with the Euro, the future of the union is quite unsure, and those who simply wish to terminate the negotia- tions are getting more and more vocal. There has been strong opposi- tion from a group around former PM Davíð Oddsson, which basically de- tests the EU and all it stands for. They have managed to form an alliance with people from the left, many of them members or former members of the Left Greens. Up to now, the leaders of the main opposition parties have been rather reticent, but recently Bjarni Benediktsson, leader of the large Inde- pendence Party, called for the nego- tiations to be stopped. Soon after Sig- mundur Davíð Gunnlaugsson, leader of the Progressive Party, followed suit. It seems clear that if the government were to fall, the application would be withdrawn. Politics in Iceland are in disarray. Jóhanna Sigurðardóttir, the Prime Min- ister, has completely lost her popular- ity. The strong man of the government, finance minister Steingrímur J. Sigfús- son, seems tired and unconvincing. He is having great problems keeping his party together. Both face electoral defeat. But they have one consolation: The opposition is just as unpopular as the government. According to a new poll, only 33 percent of the voters trust the leaders of the opposition. Words Egill Helgason Illustration Lóa Hjálmtýsdóttir Egill Helgason is a journalist, political commentator, blogger and the host of Iceland's only literary TV show, as well as Iceland's premiere political talk show. How he has time to write articles for us, we do not know. But he does. “According to an OECD report Iceland has put more money into its failed financial institutions than any other country except Ireland. So in this way Iceland is not a model—the people in Spain need not wave Icelandic f lags” ZOMBIE POLITICS Continues on page 25
Blaðsíða 1
Blaðsíða 2
Blaðsíða 3
Blaðsíða 4
Blaðsíða 5
Blaðsíða 6
Blaðsíða 7
Blaðsíða 8
Blaðsíða 9
Blaðsíða 10
Blaðsíða 11
Blaðsíða 12
Blaðsíða 13
Blaðsíða 14
Blaðsíða 15
Blaðsíða 16
Blaðsíða 17
Blaðsíða 18
Blaðsíða 19
Blaðsíða 20
Blaðsíða 21
Blaðsíða 22
Blaðsíða 23
Blaðsíða 24
Blaðsíða 25
Blaðsíða 26
Blaðsíða 27
Blaðsíða 28
Blaðsíða 29
Blaðsíða 30
Blaðsíða 31
Blaðsíða 32
Blaðsíða 33
Blaðsíða 34
Blaðsíða 35
Blaðsíða 36
Blaðsíða 37
Blaðsíða 38
Blaðsíða 39
Blaðsíða 40
Blaðsíða 41
Blaðsíða 42
Blaðsíða 43
Blaðsíða 44
Blaðsíða 45
Blaðsíða 46
Blaðsíða 47
Blaðsíða 48
Blaðsíða 49
Blaðsíða 50
Blaðsíða 51
Blaðsíða 52
Blaðsíða 53
Blaðsíða 54
Blaðsíða 55
Blaðsíða 56

x

Reykjavík Grapevine

Beinir tenglar

Ef þú vilt tengja á þennan titil, vinsamlegast notaðu þessa tengla:

Tengja á þennan titil: Reykjavík Grapevine
https://timarit.is/publication/943

Tengja á þetta tölublað:

Tengja á þessa síðu:

Tengja á þessa grein:

Vinsamlegast ekki tengja beint á myndir eða PDF skjöl á Tímarit.is þar sem slíkar slóðir geta breyst án fyrirvara. Notið slóðirnar hér fyrir ofan til að tengja á vefinn.