Læknablaðið

Årgang

Læknablaðið - 15.09.1982, Side 39

Læknablaðið - 15.09.1982, Side 39
LÆKNABLADID 219 control through chanelling projects to techno- logy evaluation, cost-benefit assessment and the promotion of clinically relevant innova- tions. 7. Medical technology assessment in the European Region of WHO There are several reasons for the continuously growing interest in the assessment of medical technologies. One of the most obvious is the contribution of medical technology to the rising cost of health care and the great demands being made on society’s limited resources. Another reason is the inadequacy of knowledge concerning the impact of vari- ous medical technologies on the health status and quality of life of individuals and the community. A third feature is the frequently changing and expanding indications for cer- tain medical technologies, which may often lead to overuse, misuse, and thus result in ineffectiveness. Underuse should also be con- sidered under certain circumstances when too many technologies of the same nature become available in a defined geographic area. Medical technology problems — Real needs — Available means — Insuffícient Assessment at national and interna- tional levels — Appropriate utilization: over-, mis-, under-use — Insuffícient guidance in development: research — production — Cost-consciousness: Lack of adequate education and training — Necessity for adaptation to »Shift« — Public, professional and industriai pressures In spite of the urgency of the problem, limited initiatives are taken at various national levels and assessment tends to be confined to special studies of individual techniques or apparatu- ses, voluntary authorizations of devices, at- tempts at standardization of equipment and sometimes simply the examination of defects, complaints and accidents; all of this may result in some recommendations which may or may not be followed by the various institutions concerned. In some countries the purchase and main- tenance of equipment is practised at national or regional levels and in others this is not possible. Legislation and statutes are very often in principle, but rarely in practice, expected to give guidance for technology purchase and applications. Practically all insti- tutes assessing the safety and efficacy of medical technologies have a purely consulta- tive function and entirely lack authoritative powers. While technical evaluations are ge- nerally performed for various types of equip- ment, utilization studies of the technologies, which should be part of the assessment procedure, are practised on a limited scale. Some health authorities in the Region have contractual agreements with specified institu- tions regarding the quality assurance of cer- tain apparatuses and purchase recommenda- tions are circulated on the basis of these results. The situation can be summarized thus: there are limited efforts but a wide realization of need for a comprehensive assessment. 8. Technology assessment network In the present programme of the Regional Office for Europe of WHO a project will develop and implement a health care techno- logy assessment network by linking selected national institutes capable of ensuring techni- cal, clinical and economic assessments of new equipment and technologies. The main criteria for the choice of these institutes is their present capability in performing assessments. Whenever possible, evaluation of presently used and insufficiently assessed equipment will also be considered. These institutes will also be requested to engage in utilization studies at various levels of health care. The neutral nature of these selected testing centres would ensure that objective, non-biased and com- plete information is made availabld to prospec- tive consumers. The work of these institutes will be coordi- nated by the Regional Office of WHO and the information gathered will be diffused to the Member States. The institutes participating in the network will thus provide a service which will not only be available to European Mem- ber States but which could also be provided to other Regions and Countries. BIBLIOGRAPHY 1. Banta, H.D. Assessing the social impacts of medical technologies. Journal of community health, 1978; 5:245.

x

Læknablaðið

Direkte link

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Læknablaðið
https://timarit.is/publication/986

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.