Reykjavík Grapevine - 09.10.2015, Blaðsíða 10

Reykjavík Grapevine - 09.10.2015, Blaðsíða 10
BUGGIN’ OUT: 10 The Reykjavík Grapevine Issue 16 — 2015 Politics | Bright?Food | Yeah? What was your initial inspiration for this project? Búi: Several things. At one point during my second year of studying design, I al- most gave up. I was working on a project and suddenly just thought to myself, "Do we really need more stuff? Isn't there something else in this field that would be more beneficial to the environment, to society?" So, I created a concept around using insects for recycling organic matter in food production. In this process, I had a lot of break- throughs in terms of what kinds of in- sects would be best to use, but at the end of the day, my conclusion was that the biggest problem wasn't finding mecha- nisms for food design; it's basically over- coming the inevitable stigma. How do we get people to eat insects? That, to my mind, is the greatest question on how we can kickstart this revolution. What did you think, Stefán? Stefán: I was studying marketing at this time, and my personal opinion on insects was probably like the opinion of every other person in the Western world who hasn't had the opportunity to eat insects: that I needed to hear the benefits before I would have a taste. I had a hard time taking that first taste, but once I did there was no problem. With you coming from a market- ing background, it seems like sell- ing this idea to the public would pose quite a challenge. S: It does. But it's probably every mar- keter's wet dream, trying to sell the un- sellable. It is a hard sell, definitely. Food is such a conservative culture, because any approach involves actually asking someone to take something, put it in their mouth, and digest it. What changed your mind? S: Discovering that it actually tasted good. That's the biggest part. It needs to taste good if it's going to be a business op- portunity. And then there's the benefits. Insects are so high in protein and min- erals compared to other animals we are depending on. The environmental benefits are one of the main selling points of in- sect farming, right? Can you break down for us how crickets and cows compare in terms of how much feed and water they require, and how much they actually produce? B: Generally speaking, insects are twenty times more sustainable than beef. To put that in real terms, you need eight litres of water to produce one kilo of protein from crickets—to produce the same amount from beef, you need 8,532 litres. Like- wise, you need one and a half kilos of feed to produce a kilo of protein from crickets, while beef requires ten kilos. Farmed fish maybe comes closest to insects in terms of this kind of sustain- ability, but then you have to consider how much space you need for the operation. Insects, apart from being much smaller than traditional sources of protein, also have a natural tendency to pack them- selves together in groups. They also produce less waste, and what they do produce can actually be used as fertil- izer—it's pretty much soil. They also emit fewer greenhouse gases. But even that's hard to measure, since a lot of insects feed on bacteria that produce greenhouse gases. So there's a level of carbon offset- ting there. What were some of the initial re- actions you got when you brought this this up with others? B: We've been extremely fortunate in that a lot of people who happened to be visit- ing Iceland for a short time were directed our way. "Here's a couple of guys taking something most people think is disgust- ing and trying to make a food product out of it," they’d say. I think a lot of people got inspired by that, and when people hear the benefits, they get even more sold on the idea that what we’re making is not just another protein bar, but a chance to change something for the better. S: We live in a time when it's so easy to get information, and people are so used to learning about new ideas. They're willing to try new foods. I mean, the best restaurant in the world—Noma in Copen- hagen—they’ll serve ants. So this is a seed that's already been planted in people’s minds. They tend to understand why we're doing this. Where are you at now in terms of production in Iceland? S: We're actually not producing in Ice- land. We're producing the bar in Canada. We tried working with people in Iceland who are making bars, but they ultimate- ly didn't have the machinery that we needed. B: At the beginning, we were actu- ally looking into having our own insect farm here in Iceland. But that process would have probably taken some five to ten years. Because it's never been done before, and navigating the bureaucracy would have been complicated. So there's bureaucratic obstacles to getting this started in Iceland? S: Yes. Crickets are a foreign animal; they're not native to Iceland. B: We have rules and regulations in place for food products, and these rules have been created around what we've always been doing—cows, pigs and chick- ens. So this raises the question of whether you need to create new rules for insects, or find a way to apply the existing rules. S: But in answer to the question, “Can we import insect-infused food prod- ucts?" the answer is yes. So where does that leave you— have any retailers approached you about putting these products on their shelves? B: We've talked to retailers in Iceland, who are on board. S: We haven't signed anything, though. We haven't begun production. That will commence at the end of Octo- ber. We pitched the idea to these retailers, and they were very positive about what we're doing and want to help. Something like 20,000 Jungle Bars wil hopefully be hitting the shelves here in Iceland at the end of the month. We have the licens- ing, we have their declaration of interest, so now all we need to do is wait and see what happens. I understand you're also hoping to market the product abroad. S: Yes. I mean, we don't think of Iceland as a big market for us, although the market for start-ups here is very good at the mo- ment. We've been able to secure enough funding to pay ourselves a little salary and continue to focus on the project. We want to experiment here, see what works and what doesn't, and then apply what we learn to other markets. The most promis- ing markets we've seen are in the US, the Netherlands, Norway, the UK, New Zea- land, Australia, Portugal... B: We've been contacted by very big parties from within the food industry in the Netherlands, Norway and Portu- gal. The smallest retailer has 112 stores, and the biggest one has thousands. We get scores of emails from journalists and consumers, producers and retailers from all over the world. That's been very inspiring. S: That's what keeps us going. If you could have your way, what would be your dream situation? B: That the Jungle Bar becomes a gate- way to accepting insects as food. That it helps change people's opinions about an entire aspect of food production. Not only regarding the food itself, but in terms of engineering and responsible use of re- sources. S: I've always said that money is a by- product of doing something great. This is why we're doing this. I love the idea of be- ing able to change culture in a way that's good for humanity. Best friends Búi Bjarmar Aðalsteinsson and Stefán Atli Thoroddsen have been tight since they first met up in secondary school. All grown up now, the duo are getting ready to commence mass production of what they call a “Jungle Bar,” which is basically your run-of-the-mill pro- tein bar, albeit with one key difference. It’s partly made of bugs. Crickets, to be exact. This is interesting, right? We thought so, so we sat them down to ask some serious, hard-hitting journalist questions. Like, why, exactly, do they feel a need to convince folks to go around eating compressed, chocolate-covered insects? Words by Paul Fontaine Photo by Art Bicnick “Food is such a conservative culture, because any approach involves actually asking someone to take something, put it in their mouth, and digest it.” Here’s Two Icelanders Who Want You To Eat A Bunch Of Crickets
Blaðsíða 1
Blaðsíða 2
Blaðsíða 3
Blaðsíða 4
Blaðsíða 5
Blaðsíða 6
Blaðsíða 7
Blaðsíða 8
Blaðsíða 9
Blaðsíða 10
Blaðsíða 11
Blaðsíða 12
Blaðsíða 13
Blaðsíða 14
Blaðsíða 15
Blaðsíða 16
Blaðsíða 17
Blaðsíða 18
Blaðsíða 19
Blaðsíða 20
Blaðsíða 21
Blaðsíða 22
Blaðsíða 23
Blaðsíða 24
Blaðsíða 25
Blaðsíða 26
Blaðsíða 27
Blaðsíða 28
Blaðsíða 29
Blaðsíða 30
Blaðsíða 31
Blaðsíða 32
Blaðsíða 33
Blaðsíða 34
Blaðsíða 35
Blaðsíða 36
Blaðsíða 37
Blaðsíða 38
Blaðsíða 39
Blaðsíða 40
Blaðsíða 41
Blaðsíða 42
Blaðsíða 43
Blaðsíða 44
Blaðsíða 45
Blaðsíða 46
Blaðsíða 47
Blaðsíða 48
Blaðsíða 49
Blaðsíða 50
Blaðsíða 51
Blaðsíða 52
Blaðsíða 53
Blaðsíða 54
Blaðsíða 55
Blaðsíða 56
Blaðsíða 57
Blaðsíða 58
Blaðsíða 59
Blaðsíða 60
Blaðsíða 61
Blaðsíða 62
Blaðsíða 63
Blaðsíða 64
Blaðsíða 65
Blaðsíða 66
Blaðsíða 67
Blaðsíða 68
Blaðsíða 69
Blaðsíða 70
Blaðsíða 71
Blaðsíða 72
Blaðsíða 73
Blaðsíða 74
Blaðsíða 75
Blaðsíða 76
Blaðsíða 77
Blaðsíða 78
Blaðsíða 79
Blaðsíða 80

x

Reykjavík Grapevine

Beinir tenglar

Ef þú vilt tengja á þennan titil, vinsamlegast notaðu þessa tengla:

Tengja á þennan titil: Reykjavík Grapevine
https://timarit.is/publication/943

Tengja á þetta tölublað:

Tengja á þessa síðu:

Tengja á þessa grein:

Vinsamlegast ekki tengja beint á myndir eða PDF skjöl á Tímarit.is þar sem slíkar slóðir geta breyst án fyrirvara. Notið slóðirnar hér fyrir ofan til að tengja á vefinn.