Reykjavík Grapevine - 09.10.2015, Blaðsíða 15

Reykjavík Grapevine - 09.10.2015, Blaðsíða 15
FRI 15The Reykjavík GrapevineIssue 16 — 2015 nite, stylised, distinctive look—reminis- cent, in a way, of the old 50s studio films. We’re trying to take those two genres, both very dear to my heart, and combine them to create something new. We’re try- ing to take something that’s completely out there and tell a story about it in a nor- mal, stylised way—in a way that you can really connect with. “Of course,” he smiles. “I think it will be horrifying in the end. I just really don’t like these horror films that treat the hor- ror aspects as if they’re the only thing in the film.” What the hell happened to Peter Jackson? Iceland is not particularly well-known for its horror cinema. It’s only in the last decade that Icelandic cinema has really taken off at all in terms of possessing its own unique aesthetic or modus operan- di. It’s only even more recently that the country has become a popular shooting location for productions the world over, with the state offering up the country- side as a sort of tax-incentivised cinemat- ic Airbnb. In terms of film and TV, most people associate Iceland with ‘Game of Thrones’ and a variety of big-budget Hol- lywood sci-fi flicks, like ‘Interstellar’ and ‘Prometheus’. Meanwhile, the domestic industry itself has been mostly concerned with realist character-based films that tend to pay tribute, in particular, to Iceland’s rural communities. We see this pretty clearly in the films that have done well internationally, like ‘Of Horses And Men’, ‘Rams’, and ‘Paris of the North’. While many of the themes in Icelandic cinema are certainly dark, it’s been a long time since we saw anything gruesome, mur- derous, and bloodcurdling take place against the backdrop of The Beautiful Icelandic Nature. However, this hasn’t always been the case. In the late 1980s, the only television station was the one run by the national broadcaster, RÚV. Although most of the content RÚV produced was nominally informative and educational, something strange happened. Viðar Víkingsson, an Icelandic director, was commissioned to produce two horror films for the state broadcaster—which, at the time, did not broadcast on Thursdays. For cultural reasons. The first of these, ‘Draugasaga’ (1985), was filmed on-location at RÚV’s studios. A classic ghost story, it follows a newly hired nightwatchman and a makeup art- ist at the TV studio, which is said to be haunted by a redheaded woman. With some highly stylized sequences and clever use of the location, it succeeds as a spooky black comedy of sorts. ‘Tilbury’ (1987), Viðar’s second hor- ror film for RÚV, is set during the British occupation of Iceland in WWII. Thanks to a real monster this time around—the terrifying, milk-stealing, worm-devil til- beri—and some exceptionally well-exe- cuted surrealist sequences, Viðar was ul- timately successful in striking a balance between horror and dark humour. Every shot is permeated with a feeling of anxi- ety and unease—keeping you constantly on the edge of your arse. Tragically, Viðar Víkingsson never made another horror film. Even sadder is the fact that both films—especially ‘Tilbury’—were of such a high quality that they would no doubt be cult classics today, were it not for the fact that neither was ever released on VHS or DVD. Even with the power of the internet and file- sharing sites, it remains nigh-on impos- sible to get hold of these movies in any form. With RÚV never offering up funding for such a production again, Icelandic horror was needlessly—and brutally— bludgeoned to death, long before it was even out of its fleshy egg-womb. With a short-but-sweet history of unique hor- ror films, it’s extremely disappointing to find that the Icelandic film industry has not, until very recently, been at all inter- ested in homebrewing some of its own horror talent or channelling that 80s en- ergy. With a couple of forgettable excep- tions, things really haven’t been horrible enough lately. That is, until now. Tales grim In many ways—especially in terms of its premise—‘Mara’ feels like a classic horror movie. A lot of it is silent, in what Elvar calls “a sort of old-school way.” “A horror film is really just about fucking with people,” he says. “And even though this is a horror film, I still have this child- ish element that I can’t get rid of, simply because of my experience of watching these classic films—they were like chil- dren’s shows to me.” It’s no surprise, then, that some of the most interesting elements of ‘Mara’ lie in the story of its production—or rather, the fairy tales and ghost stories that have al- ready grown up around it. “There’s this old lady who owns this place,” Vivian says, gesturing around us. It’s 10:45pm and the actors are enjoying a short break (one of many) while Elvar and the crew reconfigure the camera rig (again) to make sure the next shot is just right. Despite repeating the same three scenes for hours and hours, everyone is surprisingly energetic. Vivian especially so, considering this is her first feature film. “She’s a really rich lady—she has a lot of money,” she continues. “She owns land and stuff. Here, though, she wants to keep things as they are—it has to be like this. She still comes back here now and then, staying here alone, with all the same stuff in the house from decades ago. “When we were moving stuff out, we came across a couple of letters written to her years and years ago. One of them was congratulating her on her newborn. The other came later—a letter offering condo- lences.” Of course there’s a “baby” born in the film. Of course there is. “Now,” Vivian continues, leaning in closer, “her son, he had this trailer put outside when we started filming. Him and his wife came here and were talking about the house, saying, ‘Oh, we never go in the cellar.’ They had this dog that was whining and making noises because it didn’t want to go in the house—and they said the dog actually never went in the house. “You can look at this in a creepy way. We do, of course. What’s funny, and what we found out after we’d already started shooting,” she says, pausing for effect, “is that the dog’s name is ‘Mara’—the name of the film.” The house isn’t completely haunted though—at least, there’s no blood or ec- toplasm on the walls right now. While the bedroom is littered with strange, random objects—ornaments left by the owner; boxes of props; a weird, creepy baby doll—the mood remains upbeat. “We’ve been playing theme songs from other horror movies during our down- time,” Vivian explains. “That’s fun. You stay here as it runs into the night, and everyone gets a bit crazy in the head. The atmosphere is exciting and fun, and of course, it brings flavour to the film. Things start to happen on the set that you can’t always predict, allowing you to act on the camera.” A filmmaking Mafia Now that shooting has finished, it’s down to the long and arduous task of post-pro- duction, made even longer by Elvar’s me- ticulous attention to detail and perfec- tionism. Looking at the sequences which have been completed thus far, though, it’s clear that it really pays off. In fact, it was his highly conceptual style of direction that got him into this mess in the first place—emphasis on the conceptual. “We don’t have a Kickstarter yet,” he admits, with ‘Mara’ currently relying primarily on private investment. “We originally got the idea for this film three months ago. That is a really short time. Truth be told, we had nothing to do. We had no assignments. So when we first started talking about making a horror film, initially we were just joking. Some- body had the idea that it would be easy to fund a horror film, but we wouldn’t have to use the funding for the horror film— we could just get our salary. “It was a crazy idea and never went through, but we took the idea of the scam that people wanted to do,” Elvar ex- plains. “They really just wanted to make a trailer—just the most absurd trailer they could make and kind of fund it from there, without really thinking about the how the film would be, what the end result would be. Just, if we had a cool trailer, we could fund it, finish the film somehow. “We really just started to make the film, though, and haven’t done the fund- raising trailer yet. We went with the idea that we thought was the craziest, the idea that had the greatest chance of getting funding from Kickstarter—the kind of thing that just stands out. “Then we started writing, and it became a bit more serious,” he says, scratching his head. “Maybe it’s the fact that you kind of have a gun to your head in that you have to finish the draft in two weeks. You kind of start to doubt your- self, wondering, ‘Oh my god, this is such a shitty story—am I really writing this?’ “You can’t give up, so you kind of have to find something within that story. That’s kind of where the magic started to happen—and everyone liked it, so we just sort of went along with it. We had enough of a budget to start—we had the crew and the actors. So in one month we just de- cided, ‘Okay, we’re going to do it,’ and one month later, we were out shooting it. “Just yesterday, we were still getting in bigger actors for the supporting roles and that’s going really well—they’re say- ing yes,” he grins. “Two months ago, we have an idea for the craziest trailer we can make, and now people want to act in the film.” Not giving a shit, lack- ing direction, creative nepotism With its patchwork budget, small cast and crew, and seemingly ramshackle composition, you could be forgiven for mistaking ‘Mara’ as an Ed Wood-type B- horror production. However, everything surrounding the film is clearly emblematic of that pe- culiarly Icelandic brand of creative nepo- tism, rather than not-giving-a-shit or possessing a lack of direction. It’s groups of close friends and friends-of-friends coming together to just create some- thing—because fuck it, what’s stopping us? That creative energy built upon the spontaneity of “Let’s scam a Kickstarter.” Or, “Oh, I know a guy with a Jeep.” (The Jeep used by the main characters—and the crew, when it isn’t needed for shoot- ing—was actually sourced by Elvar him- self, who spent days tracking down the owner of the vehicle after seeing it drive down Njálsgata.) In this way, much new Icelandic cin- ema finds a cultural home in the shared power of these libertine creative mo- ments. In terms of its production, ‘Mara’ is in good company among other inde- pendent films that have come out of Ice- land over the last few years. With many first-time feature directors often relying on calling in as many favours as possible, there’s a clear community beginning to emerge out of our small, but dispropor- tionately productive film industry. As the first major horror film to be made as part of this emergent move- ment, however, ‘Mara’ may also be one of the first Icelandic films that attempts to rework a conventional genre into some- thing new and regionally unique. Not only that, but it’s frankly been way, way too long since a kickass horror movie was made here—and given its utterly unique aesthetic, as well as an energetic and en- thusiastic young cast and crew, it’s clear that ‘Mara’ is going to be no B-movie flop. Splat. With RÚV never offering up funding for such a production again, Icelandic horror was needlessly— and brutally—bludgeoned to death, long before it was even out of its fleshy egg-womb. With a couple of forgettable exceptions, things really haven’t been horrible enough lately.
Blaðsíða 1
Blaðsíða 2
Blaðsíða 3
Blaðsíða 4
Blaðsíða 5
Blaðsíða 6
Blaðsíða 7
Blaðsíða 8
Blaðsíða 9
Blaðsíða 10
Blaðsíða 11
Blaðsíða 12
Blaðsíða 13
Blaðsíða 14
Blaðsíða 15
Blaðsíða 16
Blaðsíða 17
Blaðsíða 18
Blaðsíða 19
Blaðsíða 20
Blaðsíða 21
Blaðsíða 22
Blaðsíða 23
Blaðsíða 24
Blaðsíða 25
Blaðsíða 26
Blaðsíða 27
Blaðsíða 28
Blaðsíða 29
Blaðsíða 30
Blaðsíða 31
Blaðsíða 32
Blaðsíða 33
Blaðsíða 34
Blaðsíða 35
Blaðsíða 36
Blaðsíða 37
Blaðsíða 38
Blaðsíða 39
Blaðsíða 40
Blaðsíða 41
Blaðsíða 42
Blaðsíða 43
Blaðsíða 44
Blaðsíða 45
Blaðsíða 46
Blaðsíða 47
Blaðsíða 48
Blaðsíða 49
Blaðsíða 50
Blaðsíða 51
Blaðsíða 52
Blaðsíða 53
Blaðsíða 54
Blaðsíða 55
Blaðsíða 56
Blaðsíða 57
Blaðsíða 58
Blaðsíða 59
Blaðsíða 60
Blaðsíða 61
Blaðsíða 62
Blaðsíða 63
Blaðsíða 64
Blaðsíða 65
Blaðsíða 66
Blaðsíða 67
Blaðsíða 68
Blaðsíða 69
Blaðsíða 70
Blaðsíða 71
Blaðsíða 72
Blaðsíða 73
Blaðsíða 74
Blaðsíða 75
Blaðsíða 76
Blaðsíða 77
Blaðsíða 78
Blaðsíða 79
Blaðsíða 80

x

Reykjavík Grapevine

Beinir tenglar

Ef þú vilt tengja á þennan titil, vinsamlegast notaðu þessa tengla:

Tengja á þennan titil: Reykjavík Grapevine
https://timarit.is/publication/943

Tengja á þetta tölublað:

Tengja á þessa síðu:

Tengja á þessa grein:

Vinsamlegast ekki tengja beint á myndir eða PDF skjöl á Tímarit.is þar sem slíkar slóðir geta breyst án fyrirvara. Notið slóðirnar hér fyrir ofan til að tengja á vefinn.