Archaeologia Islandica - 01.01.2010, Side 36

Archaeologia Islandica - 01.01.2010, Side 36
ORRI VÉSTEINSSON explicable by the mechanisms described above: with few cells each rebuilding would leave relatively little old material in the ground but as the number of cells grew the build-up would become more rapid, with greater volumes of material left from each phase. Once the build-up was under way and living on that spot had become a matter of tradition continu- ing to do so will also have become cultur- ally and emotionally meaningful (Bertelsen & Lamb 1993, 547; Aldred 2010, 106). Other effects of living on the same spot for centuries may also have begun to tell: the build-up of turf-debris from knocked down walls as well as of mid- dens will have been made easier by the gradual rising of the mound, creating sides (as well as greater likelihood of depressions that needed filling in) where material could be dumped without creat- ing problems but adding considerably to the overall volume of the mound. In 1791 Guðlaugur Sveinsson berated his countrymen: All over many sluggards display a great lack of tidiness, in that when they dismantle old houses they only push the turf-debris outside the walls, or into the gaps between rooms, and do not then transport it away. This I think is the main reason that in many places farmhouses are so sunken, that little or no part of them is above the ground apart from the roofs ... for this these [poor wretches] claim there are benefits, namely: 1) the ease of not having to transport the turf away, 2) that the old turf creates shelter for the houses, and 3) that when the walls are overgrown and the house needs rebuilding again it only becomes necessary to reconstruct the walls on the inside ... (Guðlaugur Sveinsson 1791, 246) From this it appears as if farm sites were literally drowning in old turf-debris and this is certainly indicated by low-status sites like Foma-Lá and Sandártunga (Fig. 15) where the rooms are very small but the walls very thick, so thick that their cores, made up presumably of old turf, 15. Plans of Aðalstræti, a lOth century farm to the left, and Sandártunga, abandoned in 1693 to the right, illustrating the differences in wall thickness. 34
Side 1
Side 2
Side 3
Side 4
Side 5
Side 6
Side 7
Side 8
Side 9
Side 10
Side 11
Side 12
Side 13
Side 14
Side 15
Side 16
Side 17
Side 18
Side 19
Side 20
Side 21
Side 22
Side 23
Side 24
Side 25
Side 26
Side 27
Side 28
Side 29
Side 30
Side 31
Side 32
Side 33
Side 34
Side 35
Side 36
Side 37
Side 38
Side 39
Side 40
Side 41
Side 42
Side 43
Side 44
Side 45
Side 46
Side 47
Side 48
Side 49
Side 50
Side 51
Side 52
Side 53
Side 54
Side 55
Side 56
Side 57
Side 58
Side 59
Side 60
Side 61
Side 62
Side 63
Side 64
Side 65
Side 66
Side 67
Side 68
Side 69
Side 70
Side 71
Side 72
Side 73
Side 74
Side 75
Side 76
Side 77
Side 78
Side 79
Side 80
Side 81
Side 82
Side 83
Side 84
Side 85
Side 86
Side 87
Side 88
Side 89
Side 90
Side 91
Side 92
Side 93
Side 94
Side 95
Side 96
Side 97
Side 98
Side 99
Side 100
Side 101
Side 102
Side 103
Side 104
Side 105
Side 106
Side 107
Side 108
Side 109
Side 110
Side 111
Side 112
Side 113
Side 114
Side 115
Side 116
Side 117
Side 118
Side 119
Side 120
Side 121
Side 122
Side 123
Side 124
Side 125
Side 126
Side 127
Side 128
Side 129
Side 130
Side 131
Side 132

x

Archaeologia Islandica

Direkte link

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Archaeologia Islandica
https://timarit.is/publication/1160

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.