Fjölrit RALA - 22.03.1979, Side 86

Fjölrit RALA - 22.03.1979, Side 86
-80- The taste panel consisted of 5 individuals. The vari- ation in the average scores given by each taster was very great. One taster gave all samples the average score 4.44 while a.nother taster gave the average score of 5.56. This shows the importance of not letting differences between individuals affect comparisons between the experimental groups. No significant difference was in flavor and odor between groups. Meat from group F (mountain group) got the highest score for flavor - 4.15. Meat from group D (turnips) got the lowest score for flavor - 3.74. Meat from group C (kale) got the average score 3.90 which is a little higher than the average for all groups. Subgroups 1, 2 and 3 showed no difference in flavor. The average score for odor for all groups was 3.77. A difference was between sample types. The muscle 1. dorsi received the highest score, 3.99, but the subcutaneous fat received the lowest - 3.59. The fried meat received a slight- ly higher score for odor than the boiled meat. The differ- ence in odor between groups was not significant. Groups C and F received the highest score for odor - 4.00 and 3.99 - but group D received the lowest score - 3.49. The differ- ence in scores for odor in subgroups 1, 2 and 3 was insig- nificant. The average chewing number for meat from all groups was 22.7. The muscle 1. dorsi was more tender than the muscle semimembranosus■ The average for 1. dorsi was 21.2 but 24.3 for semimembranosus■ The chewing number for subcutaneous fat was not recorded. The difference between fried and boiled meat was very small, but differences between tasters were very great. A significant difference in chewing number between groups was found. Group F had by far the most tender meat, with a chew- ing number of 16, which is only 71% of the average for all groups. This is most likely an age effect. Lambs in group F were slaughtered 33 Jays before the other lambs- Meat from groups A and B had a lower chewing number than the lambs on green feed. Meat of lambs grazed on rye grass (E) had the highest chewing number. A small difference was between subgroups 1-3 in the chewing number.
Side 1
Side 2
Side 3
Side 4
Side 5
Side 6
Side 7
Side 8
Side 9
Side 10
Side 11
Side 12
Side 13
Side 14
Side 15
Side 16
Side 17
Side 18
Side 19
Side 20
Side 21
Side 22
Side 23
Side 24
Side 25
Side 26
Side 27
Side 28
Side 29
Side 30
Side 31
Side 32
Side 33
Side 34
Side 35
Side 36
Side 37
Side 38
Side 39
Side 40
Side 41
Side 42
Side 43
Side 44
Side 45
Side 46
Side 47
Side 48
Side 49
Side 50
Side 51
Side 52
Side 53
Side 54
Side 55
Side 56
Side 57
Side 58
Side 59
Side 60
Side 61
Side 62
Side 63
Side 64
Side 65
Side 66
Side 67
Side 68
Side 69
Side 70
Side 71
Side 72
Side 73
Side 74
Side 75
Side 76
Side 77
Side 78
Side 79
Side 80
Side 81
Side 82
Side 83
Side 84
Side 85
Side 86
Side 87
Side 88
Side 89
Side 90
Side 91
Side 92
Side 93
Side 94
Side 95
Side 96
Side 97
Side 98
Side 99
Side 100
Side 101
Side 102
Side 103
Side 104
Side 105
Side 106
Side 107
Side 108
Side 109
Side 110
Side 111
Side 112
Side 113
Side 114
Side 115
Side 116
Side 117
Side 118
Side 119
Side 120
Side 121
Side 122
Side 123
Side 124
Side 125
Side 126
Side 127
Side 128
Side 129
Side 130
Side 131
Side 132
Side 133
Side 134
Side 135
Side 136
Side 137
Side 138
Side 139
Side 140

x

Fjölrit RALA

Direkte link

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Fjölrit RALA
https://timarit.is/publication/1497

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.