Iceland review - 2006, Side 64

Iceland review - 2006, Side 64
62 ICELAND REVIEW in his home country.” Is Iceland, a wealthy nation, deporting frightened refugees back to third-world countries where they wind up in dusty prison cells, possibly left to die? “We are adamant that we are living up to our responsibilities. We are not sending people back to where they are being persecuted,” Gudmundsson replies. FEAR OF DEATH or persecution are the main reasons why a person f lees their home country. With all the legalese f lung back and forth between Justice and lawyers battling for their clients, it’s easy to forget that the asylum seekers at the hostel are more than numbers and statistics to be debated. “We live out here like dogs,” says a Nigerian asylum seeker, who also prefers not to reveal his name. With his voice rising like a preacher delivering a sermon, he adds: “They should treat us like human beings.” Clad in a woolly sweater and hat, this charismatic man leans over a hot stove in a cluttered kitchen that looks as if it’s inhabited by a collection of college kids. He’s preparing spiced chicken and some sort of doughy bread. “African food,” he tells me. Money for food comes out of the measly ISK 2,000 weekly allowance doled out to each asylum seeker by the municipality of Reykjanesbaer. While the Nigerian is obviously worried about his case, which has been pending for about four months, he seems to rather enjoy cooking. It helps him pass the time. “It’s not so bad out there,” says Idunn Ingólfsdóttir, who was hired by the Reykjanesbaer government two years ago to tend to the needs of asylum seekers while they live in limbo. “What they really need is something to do.” Ingólfsdóttir points out that she is not a social worker. Instead, she sets doctor’s appointments for asylum seekers, helps them find lawyers, trips to the swimming pool. She is always available by telephone, and visits the hostel five days a week, sometimes just so “they have someone to talk to.” While Ingólfsdóttir’s relationship with the asylum seekers is far from motherly, she sometimes grows close to those she helps the most, the ones who choose to share more of their complicated stories with her. It must be a difficult job since roughly 96 percent of the asylum seekers she befriends will be deported. “I’m almost always there when someone is deported. I’m there to take their key. These are people who have been here for maybe a year with me. I think it’s better to close like that. To say goodbye,” she says. Trying to get her to open up, I ask if she grows despondent watching so many displaced people come and go through Iceland’s revolving doors. Ingólfsdóttir chuckles, playing her emotions close to her chest like a poker player working a bluff. “Sometimes you want a particular person to get [asylum], but I try not to think like that. I don’t make any decisions. I just make sure they have food and can sleep.” A LACK OF SOMETHING TO DO is an issue the Icelandic Red Cross also feels strongly about, according to Atli Vidar Thorstensen, project manager for asylum seekers and refugees. It’s one of the few points of contention the organization will voice on record against the government’s handling of asylum seekers for fear of tainting the Red Cross’ founding principle of neutrality. (The other main complaints are that asylum seekers don’t have free access to an attorney until their case has been rejected by Immigration, and they file for an appeal. Plus, they are not issued ID cards stating who they are and that they have a legal right to be in Iceland while their cases are pending.) “The asylum system in Iceland is not as developed as in other countries,” Thorstensen says. “But our overall treatment of asylum seekers is not bad. We think it’s more humane if they have something NUMBER OF POLITICAL HUMANITARIAN APPLICANTS ASYLUM PERMISSION 1990 4 0 2 1991 8 0 0 1992 3 0 2 1993 7 0 0 1994 0 0 0 1995 4 0 0 1996 4 0 1 1997 6 0 3 1998 24 0 13 1999 24 1 5 2000 25 0 4 SCHENGEN IMPLEMENTED 2001 53 0 8 2002 117 0 5 2003 80 0 3 2004 76 0 0 2005 87 0 0 TOTALS 522 1 46 ICELANDIC RED CROSS STATISTICS ON ASYLUM
Side 1
Side 2
Side 3
Side 4
Side 5
Side 6
Side 7
Side 8
Side 9
Side 10
Side 11
Side 12
Side 13
Side 14
Side 15
Side 16
Side 17
Side 18
Side 19
Side 20
Side 21
Side 22
Side 23
Side 24
Side 25
Side 26
Side 27
Side 28
Side 29
Side 30
Side 31
Side 32
Side 33
Side 34
Side 35
Side 36
Side 37
Side 38
Side 39
Side 40
Side 41
Side 42
Side 43
Side 44
Side 45
Side 46
Side 47
Side 48
Side 49
Side 50
Side 51
Side 52
Side 53
Side 54
Side 55
Side 56
Side 57
Side 58
Side 59
Side 60
Side 61
Side 62
Side 63
Side 64
Side 65
Side 66
Side 67
Side 68
Side 69
Side 70
Side 71
Side 72
Side 73
Side 74
Side 75
Side 76
Side 77
Side 78
Side 79
Side 80
Side 81
Side 82
Side 83
Side 84
Side 85
Side 86
Side 87
Side 88
Side 89
Side 90
Side 91
Side 92
Side 93
Side 94
Side 95
Side 96
Side 97
Side 98
Side 99
Side 100
Side 101
Side 102
Side 103
Side 104
Side 105
Side 106
Side 107
Side 108
Side 109
Side 110
Side 111
Side 112
Side 113
Side 114
Side 115
Side 116

x

Iceland review

Direkte link

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Iceland review
https://timarit.is/publication/1842

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.