Lögberg-Heimskringla - 15.01.2019, Blaðsíða 5

Lögberg-Heimskringla - 15.01.2019, Blaðsíða 5
VISIT OUR WEBSITE LH-INC.CA Lögberg-Heimskringla • 15. janúar 2019 • 5 Stefan Jonasson The world was slow to notice that Iceland had become an independent country during the last month of 1918. Earlier in the year, there had been a flurry of stories in the North American press repeating a rumour emanating from Berlin that reported, “Denmark fears that Iceland may secede and declare itself a republic,” hinting that it would “later attach itself to Great Britain.” However, Reuter’s quickly debunked the rumour as German wartime propaganda while noting that Britain had, in fact, purchased the entirety of Iceland’s fish catch that was available for export. But when Iceland actually achieved its sovereignty as a kingdom, rather than a republic, the world’s press was largely silent. Even Heimskringla and Lögberg had little to say on the subject. Heimskringla published the results of the referendum, albeit more than a week after sovereignty had already come into effect, but the rest of the Winnipeg newspapers’ coverage, slight as it was, was buried as small items in general “news from Iceland” articles. The Icelandic newspapers offered more robust coverage, as would be expected, but even that coverage often missed the significance of the change that sovereignty represented. Perhaps this is why, looking back after a century, leaders refer to the “working woman Elka Björnsdóttir” whose diary entry for December 1, 1918, shows that she clearly understood the significance of the day. The oversight is understandable. Sovereignty came only weeks after the armistice ending the First World War, an influenza epidemic was ravaging many countries, and national boundaries were changing across Europe. In Iceland, the volcano Katla had erupted in October and the both Icelandic and English papers in Winnipeg devoted more type to that eruption and news about the flu. Sovereignty may have seemed somewhat esoteric in light of the problems being faced at the time. More than half a year after Iceland’s sovereignty was declared, the country’s change in status finally caught the attention of The New York Times, which ran a lengthy article by Dr. Guðmundur Finnbogason, “Self-Determination for the Icelanders,” in its issue of July 13, 1919. “On Dec. 1 the new Icelandic flag was hoisted on the Government House in Reykjavík, and a little State of 93,000 people entered the family of nations,” Guðmundur began. “This agreement between Denmark and Iceland was reached on the initiative of Prime Minister Zahle of Denmark and Jon Magnusson, Premier of the Icelandic kingdom, with the approval of the Icelandic Althing and Danish Parliament. Under it the King of Denmark becomes King of Iceland.” Guðmundur went on to describe in considerable detail the practical changes that had come about through sovereignty, distilling the most important details of the Act of Union in language that was much more clear and concise than the act itself, setting forth the implications of the legislation. “Iceland has, in the Danish Foreign Office, an agent who is commissioned to dispatch Icelandic affairs. Iceland may, on her own budget, make provisions to send Ministers or Consuls to those places where Denmark has no diplomatic or Consular agents; to Danish legations and consulates may again be adjoined Icelandic advisers, also appointed by Iceland. Special delegates empowered to discuss exclusively Icelandic affairs may also, after deliberation with the Danish Minister of Foreign Affairs, be sent by the Icelandic Government.” Denmark would continue patrol Iceland’s territorial waters until “Iceland desires to entirely or partly take that control into her own hands.” “A consultative committee of six members, appointed in equal proportion by the Danish and Icelandic Parliaments, shall on principle be allowed to give its opinion on all bills which concern the interests of both countries before they are presented to the respective Parliaments.” In the event that the two countries’ governments could not agree on the interpretation of the Act of Union, an arbitration committee consisting of four members, drawn equally from the supreme court of each country, would be empowered to decide the matter. If this committee were evenly divided, an arbiter appointed by the Swedish and Norwegian governments would decide the matter. “After the expiration of the year 1940, the Parliament of each nation can, of its own accord and at any time, demand that the action of union be taken under revision. Should this revision not lead to a new agreement in the course of three years the Danish Parliament or the Althing may, each for itself, declare null and void the contract contained in the act of union; this declaration takes effect if the Parliament by its votes, and the people by a plebiscite, both give it an appointed majority. Denmark informs other nations that she recognizes Iceland as a sovereign State and that Iceland declares her perpetual neutrality.” As it happened, Guðmundur lived just long enough to see that final step taken on June 17, 1944; he died the following month. It was natural for The New York Times to turn to Guðmundur Finnbogason, who was one of Iceland’s leading scholars a century ago. Born in 1873, he attended Lærði skólinn (The Learned School of Reykjavík), now known as Menntaskólinn í Reykjavík, studied philosophy at the University of Copenhagen, and earned his master’s degree in psychology in 1901, becoming one of Iceland’s first recognized psychologists. ... continued on page 6 What if you declared independence and the world hardly noticed? Store Hours: Mon. - Sat. 9 a.m. - 6 p.m. Fri. 9 a.m. - 8 p.m. Sun. noon - 6 p.m. Pharmacist: V. T. Eyolfson Box 640, Arborg, MB R0C 0A0 Ph: 204-376-5153 ARBORG PHARMACY SHARED WISDOM • SHARED COMMITMENT • SHARED VALUES Robert T. Kristjanson 125 5th Avenue Gimli, MB R0C 1B0 Fax: 204-642-7306 Phone: 204-642-5283 ÁRBÓK LANDSBÓKASAFNS ÍSLANDS, 1945 Guðmundur Finnbogason as a younger man Morgunblaðið devoted the cover of its December 2, 1918, issue to sovereignty – the most extensive coverage of any newspaper at the time.

x

Lögberg-Heimskringla

Beinir tenglar

Ef þú vilt tengja á þennan titil, vinsamlegast notaðu þessa tengla:

Tengja á þennan titil: Lögberg-Heimskringla
https://timarit.is/publication/160

Tengja á þetta tölublað:

Tengja á þessa síðu:

Tengja á þessa grein:

Vinsamlegast ekki tengja beint á myndir eða PDF skjöl á Tímarit.is þar sem slíkar slóðir geta breyst án fyrirvara. Notið slóðirnar hér fyrir ofan til að tengja á vefinn.