Reykjavík Grapevine - 03.12.2004, Blaðsíða 18

Reykjavík Grapevine - 03.12.2004, Blaðsíða 18
Russians today say that they believe in God, two out of five say that they didn’t then but that they do now. In general, and in a general trend opposite to the West, it is the older generation, the one that grew up without god, that is the most irreligious. In the west, the post war generations that grew up with materialism at its most rampant are the least religious. God, it seems, is a concept you learn about. But where, then, does, this feeling of eternity, that most of us can feel at times in one form or another, come from? The poet and Nobel Prize winner Romain Rolland, who wrote that art was not an illusion because it must not be, asked his friend Sigmund Freud this very question. Romain spoke of an oceanic feeling of the eternal shared by millions of people. Was this the origin of man´s feeling of God? Sigmund, as usual, went back to early childhood to come up with an answer. Although he claims to not feel it himself, he acknowledges that this feeling of being at one with the Universe does indeed exist. It is, in fact, nothing more than a memory. Before we discovered the “I”, that we were beings distinct from our surroundings, we felt at one with everything. But then we realise that some things, such as our mothers´ breast, are outside our being, and slowly we learn to distinguish between the two. Any feeling of oneness with the Universe is hence a memory from the time we did not distinguish ourselves as a distinct part of it. The key to the kingdom is not within us after all. God in politics Descartes did not live to see the society without God. But God has been in steady retreat ever since the days of Descartes. Two years before he died in 1650, Europe’s last great religious war came to an end. Having settled on the permanent division between a protestant Northern and Catholic southern Europe, almost six hundred years after Pope Leo IX and Patriarch Michael Cerularius mutually excommunicated each other, creating an Orthodox Eastern Europe, God has been, by and large, banished from international politics. The Glorious Revolution of 1688 brought to an end the religious wars of Britain if not Northern Ireland, and Europe’s next major wars were fought as always with God on every side, but this time little attempt was made to distinguish what made the God of the Austrians different from that of the French, or what made the God of the Prussians distinct from the God of the English. Although ostensibly dynastic wars, they were fought primarily over control of trade, colonies and resources. Soldiers were by and large mercenaries who needed no motive other than money. Never since has war been fought as unashamedly for profit. Ideology didn’t re-enter European politics until the French revolutionary wars of the 1790´s. In defence of the republic, the French mobilised the population on a previously unheard of scale, creating mass armies inflammed by political ideology, that were able to defeat all the other European powers in the field. When other governments discovered that political ideologies were as potent a means to pushing the masses onto the battlefields as religion ever had been, they sooner or later adopted one or the other as their reason for being. Armies grew in size as conscription was introduced in defence of the nation, climaxing with the slaughter of the World Wars. The static world of the post war era led to political apathy among the masses in both east and west. The last time a democracy fought a war using conscripted troops was in the catastrophic Vietnam War, detested and renounced by large parts of the population. Political ideology was no longer motivation enough for the people to go to war. In 1989, the peoples of Eastern Europe renounced political ideology spectacularly in favour of mass consumerism. There was no longer anything to kill or die for. Some even prophesied the end of history. And then, on September 11th 2001, God returned. With nothing else left to believe in, perhaps it was inevitable that he would make a return. How did it all begin? My second argument for the existence of God goes back to the beginning. Were did we come from? You can trace yourself back to your parents and their parents, and, with the help of modern science back to the primeval sludge we all came from and from there to the Big Bang, but you always reach a dead end. And what then? Philosophically, as well as politically, God had been in steady decline since the days of Descartes. The second argument Descartes used to prove the existence of God is the question of creation. At some point, something has to come out of nothing. This, then, must be where God comes in. But of course, this is just postponing the problem, for what created God? What is the prequel to Genesis 1.1? In fact, the great monotheistic religions that originated in the Middle East are among the first to think that there even was a beginning to the Universe. This linear view of the world, that things necessarily move from one point to another, may explain the great dynamism of Islam, Christianity and Judaism. Most previous religions saw the world in terms of cycles, most probably inspired by the cyclical course of nature. Summer, autumn, winter and spring follow one another in perpetuity. In China, Ying alternated with Yang, in India one Brahma followed another, each lasting 311 trillion years. Small wonder that the impatient West adapted a religion wherein everything was created in a week with time to spare. In ancient Greece, things also moved in cycles, but here the cycles differed from one another. And of course, things are getting worse all the time. The first age of man was a Golden Age ruled by Cronos, where man did not have to toil and aged backwards. He was usurped by Zeus who created a silver age. But silver age man was disobedient, so Zeus decided to destroy him and start anew. Now came the Bronze Age, inhabited by a warrior race, but still Zeus was unhappy and killed them off in a flood. Next came the Heroic Age, populated by heroes and demigods. These, inevitably, wound up destroying each other but some of their tales still exist, most notably the story of the Trojan War. This was followed by the Iron Age, the one we currently live in, a time abandoned by the Gods, a time of evil. But it won’t last forever, one day Zeus will return, destroy it all and begin anew. Greek thought was inherited by the Islamic Arabs after their conquest of the Middle Eastern provinces of the Greek- Byzantine Empire, and reintroduced into Western Europe by the Crusaders returning from the Holy Land, steeped in Arab blood and learning. There, it was merged with Christian doctrine and formed the basis for modern Western thought. But unlike the Greeks, the great monotheistic religions do not believe in endless cycles. Time must have a stop. There is a beginning and an end. Scripture is silent on what came before, nothing it seems, and it all ends in Armageddon followed by heaven on earth. Zeus was the son of Cronos and his sister Rhea, who were the offspring of Uranos and Gaia, the sky and the earth who both sprang up, for no reason given, from Chaos. Babylonian creation myths also have God springing from Chaos. But the Judeo-Christian God is firmly divorced from the earth. He is not of it, he created it, seemingly out of nothing. In the age of Descartes, his contemporary Galileo, and Newton who followed them, thinkers liked to think of God as the watchmaker who created the Universe and set it in motion, but has had little to do with it since. It was generally believed that the Universe, once created, would last forever. In the 19th Century, when God was discredited as a bourgeoisie conspiracy by Marx and pronounced dead by another hirsute German, Friedrich Nietzsche, physicists engaged in thermodynamics began to worry that as heat flows from hot to cold, then the Universe, wherein heat and cold are unevenly distributed but nonetheless strives towards equilibrium, cannot have been around forever. Otherwise the hot parts would long ago have flowed into the cold, resulting in “heat death.” In other words, all the suns would have burned out an eternity ago. In the 1920´s astronomers realised that the Universe was in fact expanding, leading to the Big Bang theory. But a Big Bang does not exclude a creationist God, and Pope Pius XII acknowledged the theory in 1951. The Devil may be in the details, however, as according to astronomers the Universe has been 15 billion years in the making rather than six days, but still, there is nothing here yet that says the Universe was not created by God. Did God create the world? So did God set off the Big Bang? According to Einstein’s´ theory of relativity, matter cannot be divorced from space and time. Before there was matter, there can have been no space or time for God to exist in. If there is a God he is situated entirely not just outside matter but outside time and space too. Which makes you wonder what he’s got to do with anything. But one problem still remains. If not God, then what caused the Big Bang? If the ultimate reason behind everything leads us back to the beginning of the Universe, how did the Universe happen? At what point did something come out of nothing? According to Stephen Hawking, the Universe did not have a starting point. Which is not to say it has always existed. There are in fact four dimensions, as Einstein pointed out and HG Wells utilised in The Time Machine. There are the three dimensions of space and then there is time. If we go back to the beginning of the Universe, we will not find a single point of beginning, but rather an ellipse. Hence it is impossible to go to the beginning of the Universe as it is impossible to go to the ends of the earth. There is no starting point to the earth, the Universe or anything. I will not go any farther into quantum mechanics, partly because I don’t have space (or time), partly because I don’t understand them. But God has been pushed out of the Universe farther and farther until he now resides merely as creator. And even there he is currently under attack. Without a definitive starting point to creation, there is no need for a creator God. Where does God go from here? God has returned to the realm of politics more than he has to the realm of ideas. True Believers today more often than not seek to set science aside, and even reason itself, dismissing it in favour of religion. Just as the Second World War was a three way battle between Central European fascism, Anglo-American capitalism and Soviet communism, the two winners then having it out with each other, we’re now witnessing a three way struggle between the Islamic Middle East, Secular Europe and a Christian controlled United States. So far, the two parties most prone to resorting to violence happen to be the ones that believe in a God. Science may in the end provide the ultimate answer as to how everything happened. But now that we’re here, what do we do about it? It is here that we reach the true limits of science. But it still stands to reason. Descartes, who professed to believing in God, wondered why there is evil in the world. God may be intangible and unquantifiable, but the results of evil are too apparent. Man has a will which is not limited in the way reason is. When will surpasses reason, evil results. Why did God then give us more will than reason? Because we have needs which need to be fulfilled, needs without which the body does not function. Needs create will, but our will often surpasses our needs. There may be no being with horns that tempts us to do evil, and no God to punish us if we do, but there is the very human trait of greed. Whether we believe in God or not, we would be wise to think more about what we need and less about what we want. Which may be more reasonable. Greek thought was reintroduced into Western Europe by the Crusaders returning from the Holy Land, steeped in Arab blood and learning.1.1 1.2 A Big Bang does not exclude a creationist God, and Pope Pius XII acknowledged the theory in 1951.

x

Reykjavík Grapevine

Beinir tenglar

Ef þú vilt tengja á þennan titil, vinsamlegast notaðu þessa tengla:

Tengja á þennan titil: Reykjavík Grapevine
https://timarit.is/publication/943

Tengja á þetta tölublað:

Tengja á þessa síðu:

Tengja á þessa grein:

Vinsamlegast ekki tengja beint á myndir eða PDF skjöl á Tímarit.is þar sem slíkar slóðir geta breyst án fyrirvara. Notið slóðirnar hér fyrir ofan til að tengja á vefinn.