Reykjavík Grapevine - 07.10.2011, Blaðsíða 32

Reykjavík Grapevine - 07.10.2011, Blaðsíða 32
32 The Reykjavík Grapevine Issue 16 — 2011 Local newspaper Fréttablaðið recently reported that The City of Reykjavík had can- celled a subsidy earmarked for the Icelandic Church of Christ (a small independent Lutheran congregation) due to its hostile views towards homosexu- als. The story started in June, when the city’s church-construction fund agreed to grant subsidies to various projects, thereof 700.000 ISK to the Church of Christ. Frét- tablaðið says the city’s executive commit- tee later decided to stop the funding and send the matter to the city’s human rights officer, Anna Kristinsdóttir, for examina- tion. The reason? Suspicions regarding the congregation’s preaching, and whether they violated Reykjavík’s human rights pol- icy. Suspicions that were later proved true. According to Fréttablaðið, the officer ruled that the congregation’s preaching were contradictory to the city’s policy and rec- ommended the funding to be withdrawn. Which was done. Now, how did the con- gregation violate the city’s human rights policy? SAVE THE CHILDREN FROM HOMO- SExUALITY AND DEBAUCHERY Fréttablaðið cites the officer, who said the congregation’s website was swarming with examples of leader Friðrik Schram’s hostile views towards homosexuals. According to the officer, Friðrik’s articles preach that homosexuality is an unnatural thing, a sin, and is comparable to theft and lies. The officer cites an article where the leader says that “young vulnerable souls must be protected from being seduced into homo- sexuality and/or debauchery.” Friðrik, on the other hand, complains about the withdrawal. He says the city is punishing him for saying that ‘homosexu- ality isn’t good and healthy for us.’ A view he says the Christian church has held for two thousand years. Friðrik reiterates this view in Fréttablaðið on September 20, but denies to have referred to homosexual people as ‘sinners.’ Apparently, he was merely talking about the act of homosexual intercourse. He claims that many homo- sexuals do not have sex at all and that one should make a distinction between sexu- ality and sexual acts. He then goes on to emphasise that homosexual relationships are wrong, claiming to speak for the major- ity of the Christian world. He concludes by presenting himself as a victim of suppres- sion of opinion and that he now is being discriminated against. MASKING HATRED AS FATHERLY CARE AND LOVE Not for one second does it occur to me to discuss LGBT rights on the premises of a fundamentalist’s understanding of a two thousand years old religious scripture he chooses to live by. However, I am going to analyse Friðrik’s choice of words and criticise his impertinent methods. When doing so there are mainly three points in his speech I stumble over. Firstly, there is the classical approach of today’s Christian fundamentalists ‘hating the sin, but loving the sinner,’ which of course has its roots in The Bible. A similar theme has been promi- nent in many Western countries’ ‘sodomy laws’ through the ages. The focus is alleg- edly on the act, not the person. By making this distinction people have tried to mask their hate and condemnation as fatherly care and love. This is however of no differ- ence to homosexuals, who experience no less hatred or condemnation, fully know- ing that love and sex will not that easily be separated. We all want to experience love, and it so happens that sex plays a huge role in that experience. Sexual drive is simply an integrated part human nature and should be allowed to thrive. This, of course, should be a well known fact to Friðrik. The prob- lem is that he only wants people to experi- ence this on his own terms. THE HUMAN RIGHTS MONSTER Secondly, Friðrik dresses up as an ‘ordi- nary’ victim of power, while simultaneously trying to belittle the human rights office and push its policy to the fringe. This he does by accusing the office of ‘creating its own rules and imposing them on everyone else.’ That is to say, he creates a terrifying monster whose sole purpose is to force ‘or- dinary’ people into living by its strange and alien policy. An attack like this can best be tackled by pointing out that the human rights office doesn’t float around in some kind of a vacuum. It bases its mandate on Icelandic law and constitution, as well as the many international conventions Ice- land has committed itself to, e.g. within the United Nations and the Council of Europe. These documents are the results of de- cades of work on the advancement of hu- man rights and are in fact the offspring of a philosophical debate that goes back many centuries and revolves around the dignity and goodness of mankind. One therefore has to ask: who’s the monster here? THE MARTYR Thirdly, Friðrik goes to the extreme and tries to make a martyr of himself. We wit- ness the theatrical entrance of a white, heterosexual, Christian male, who turns everything upside down and compares his situation to that of LGBT people that for centuries have been the subject of ha- tred and persecution, torture and death. And what is he complaining about? He’s complaining about the ‘injustice’ hetero- sexual people, who express their antipathy against homosexual people’s sexual be- haviour, now must suffer. ‘Where is the tol- erance?’ Friðrik asks. This question really has one answer only: You must be joking! Honestly, this is no different from the bully that starts whining when stopped from ha- rassing the minors on the playground. But it’s a well known and popular theme none- theless. Recently used by a bunch of white, straight, right winged, males, whimpering and feeling persecuted by the homosexual pop star Páll Óskar and his comments at this year’s Reykjavík Gay Pride. Typical re- action of the ruling power that automati- cally takes on the role of a persecuted mi- nority whenever the real minorities dare to take their minor steps towards equality. HUMAN RIGHTS POLICY IN ACTION No. Reykjavík City’s recent actions are just the right reaction in just the right moment. They send a clear message about how prejudice and injustice will not be tolerated on the watch of those currently controlling City Hall. They encourage future council- lors and they clearly signal the fact that Reykjavík City’s Human Rights Policy is not a meaningless document for ornamental use only. That bigotry can cost you money. That the concept of human rights doesn’t embody the right to trample on the rights of others. That hate speech does not de- serve public funding. Opinion | Hilmar Magnússon Reykjavík City: Hate Speech Is Not A ‘Human Right’ Do you feel that conducting in some good ol' fashioned 'hate speech' should be your 'human right'? Why/why not? Aðalstræti 2 / 101 Reykjavík / tel. 511 1212 / sjavarkjallarinn.is FEEL WELCOM E Fischersund Vesturg a ta A ð a ls tr æ ti Tryggvagata Austurstræti Hafnarstræti Ingólfs- torg Hafnarhús At the SEAFOOD CELLAR RESTAURANT we place New Nordic kitchen in the forefront. We are a seasonal restaurant that worships everything that Icelandic nature brings us as well as getting a few things from Scandinavia. We only use the freshest and the best nature brings us. We, and our ambitious, productive friends collect and produce the raw materials and bring it home. We serve it with love and respect for the ingredients and the environment around us. We do it our way. Where Tchaikovsky meets Björk • ICELAND AIRWAVES • NORDIC MUSIC DAYS • BJÖRK BIOPHILIA • THE ICELANDIC OPERA • THE ICELAND SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA • ÓLAFUR ARNALDS • YOU ARE IN CONTROL • ELVIS COSTELLO • FROSTRÓSIR www.harpa.is WWW.ICELANDAIR.IS Just a few of the events taking place in Harpa this autumn. Guided tours of the building are available daily. Visit www.harpa.is for further information. ÍS LE N SK A SI A. IS H AR 5 66 42 1 0/ 11 -and it doesn’t deserve public funding Music | Reviews Since their 2007 debut ‘Bat Out Of Hellvar,’ Hellvar have grown from a duo and laptop to a fully fledged band, with drums, bass and everything. And with their second album, they are setting out to ROCK very hard, like a fucker of mothers. And yes, ‘Stop That Noise,’ does have plenty of rock components such as big drum rolls and squalling guitars. But for a ROCK album it feels too clipped, too constrained, too clean to really hit home. There’s a distinct lack of dirt going on here. Even Heiða’s vocals, while good and strong, are not particularly that rock- ing. No, what ‘Stop That Noise’ is is a superior piece of pop-as-rock, just like their music spirit totem, Garbage. There are some really catchy tunes and lyrics on this album, although they do remind you of other tunes. ‘I Should Be Cool’ contains that stomp riff motif that’s been used by everyone from the Troggs to Transvision Vamp, ‘Falsetto’ has the cyber-pop feel of T.A.T.U, while I’m sure they got clearance from Janes Addic- tion’s lawyers to rework ‘Classic Girl’ as ‘Anna Amma.’ But despite this air of similarity, ‘Stop That Noise’ does show a clear progres- sion from their first album and there’s definitely enough here to keep their fans interested. - BOB CLUNESS Hellvar Stop That Noise www.gogoyoko.com/artist/hellvar Helluva familiar noise Iceland’s synth pop revival continues apace with the debut release from the latest project of Reykjavík duo Vilmar Pedersen and Jón Schow. ‘Let The Party Start’ is a simple 3 track EP of smouldering mid-tempo synth pop, that bubbles and foams with happy juice in its joints. LTPS doesn’t reinvent the wheel or change the game of synth pop, but the production shows a lightness of touch, and with some of the synth sounds and robot vocals on tracks such as ‘Ultra Beam,’ you’d easily be forgiven for thinking that the likes of Evil Madness were trying to slip some secret synth tracks under the radar. - BOB CLUNESS Synthadelia Let The Party Start EP synthadeliarecords.bandcamp.com Happy Party Time
Blaðsíða 1
Blaðsíða 2
Blaðsíða 3
Blaðsíða 4
Blaðsíða 5
Blaðsíða 6
Blaðsíða 7
Blaðsíða 8
Blaðsíða 9
Blaðsíða 10
Blaðsíða 11
Blaðsíða 12
Blaðsíða 13
Blaðsíða 14
Blaðsíða 15
Blaðsíða 16
Blaðsíða 17
Blaðsíða 18
Blaðsíða 19
Blaðsíða 20
Blaðsíða 21
Blaðsíða 22
Blaðsíða 23
Blaðsíða 24
Blaðsíða 25
Blaðsíða 26
Blaðsíða 27
Blaðsíða 28
Blaðsíða 29
Blaðsíða 30
Blaðsíða 31
Blaðsíða 32
Blaðsíða 33
Blaðsíða 34
Blaðsíða 35
Blaðsíða 36
Blaðsíða 37
Blaðsíða 38
Blaðsíða 39
Blaðsíða 40
Blaðsíða 41
Blaðsíða 42
Blaðsíða 43
Blaðsíða 44
Blaðsíða 45
Blaðsíða 46
Blaðsíða 47
Blaðsíða 48
Blaðsíða 49
Blaðsíða 50
Blaðsíða 51
Blaðsíða 52
Blaðsíða 53
Blaðsíða 54
Blaðsíða 55
Blaðsíða 56
Blaðsíða 57
Blaðsíða 58
Blaðsíða 59
Blaðsíða 60
Blaðsíða 61
Blaðsíða 62
Blaðsíða 63
Blaðsíða 64
Blaðsíða 65
Blaðsíða 66
Blaðsíða 67
Blaðsíða 68
Blaðsíða 69
Blaðsíða 70
Blaðsíða 71
Blaðsíða 72

x

Reykjavík Grapevine

Beinir tenglar

Ef þú vilt tengja á þennan titil, vinsamlegast notaðu þessa tengla:

Tengja á þennan titil: Reykjavík Grapevine
https://timarit.is/publication/943

Tengja á þetta tölublað:

Tengja á þessa síðu:

Tengja á þessa grein:

Vinsamlegast ekki tengja beint á myndir eða PDF skjöl á Tímarit.is þar sem slíkar slóðir geta breyst án fyrirvara. Notið slóðirnar hér fyrir ofan til að tengja á vefinn.