Reykjavík Grapevine - 23.05.2014, Blaðsíða 27

Reykjavík Grapevine - 23.05.2014, Blaðsíða 27
Man, fuck Darren Aronofsky. Fuck his weak, hacky, hammy, pretentious, melodra- matic, student-filmmaking-with-a-budget shit. I’ve always been mystified as to how it is he gets people to buy his overdone soap opera crap as serious film, but I’m confi- dent 'Noah'—a retelling of the renowned Biblical yarn with all the animals on the boat, shot largely in Iceland—will finally be his undoing; it will expose his shoddily construct- ed ‘films’ for what they are: overwrought and overrated pandering to fad-driven art-house wannabes who are too impatient for genuine counterculture film, but too proud to admit they’d rather be watching a Michael Bay movie. Words Sindri Eldon Uh, No: Darren Aronofsky’s ‘Noah’ 27The Reykjavík GrapevineIssue 06 — 2014 FILM I heard the sound of their wings Ich hörte das Rauschen ihrer FlügelJ’entendais le bruit de leurs ailesjeg hørte lyden af deres vingerÉg heyrði þytinn frá vængjum þeirraaudiebam sonum alarum LÁRA BRYNDÍS EGGERTSDÓTTIR at the Klais organ of Hallgrímskirkja PREMIÈRE OF NEW ICELANDIC ORGAN MUSIC commissioned by Lára Bryndís Eggertsdóttir Sunday June 1st at 5 pm Admission 2.500 ISK Ticket sale at the entrance one hour before the concert CD and sheet music available in Hallgrímskirkja or through www.audiebam.is Listvinafélag Hallgrímskirkju 32. starfsár / The Friends of the Arts Society Hallgrimskirkja 32nd season www.listvinafelag.is CONCERT R E V I E W FILM R E V I E W Not that 'Noah' makes any kind of serious attempt to disguise itself as an art-house film. Occasional bouts of faux time-lapse notwithstanding, Noah is a through-and- through fantasy/adventure film, com- plete with an epic battle between teem- ing hordes of sword-wielding soldiers and CGI monsters, a glowering Russell Crowe yelling at people for no reason, Emma Watson running around a forest while being distraught and a Shake- spearian actor playing an old wizard. …or at least the first act is. Confus- ingly enough, once 'Noah' has dispensed with the Tolkienesque antics in its set-up (although it comes across more ‘Battle- field: Earth’ than Battle of Helm’s Deep), it scrambles desperately to squeeze some human drama out of its vague environ- mentalist parable/Biblical tale, conjur- ing up some of Aronofsky’s typically trite melodrama and leaving Jennifer Connelly, champ that she is, to act her ass off to try to establish some pathos. She receives no help from the woefully underequipped Watson, the perennially miscast Ray Winstone, the near-invisible Logan Lerman, the laughably handsome Douglas Booth and least of all from her stone-faced co-star, with whom she has exactly zero chemistry, and as a conse- quence her efforts fall sadly short. The flimsy drama reaches its ‘climax’ when Aronofsky reaches into his big bag of button-pushing shockers to prove how edgy he is and retrieves: infanticide! Oh, no he didn’t! The film’s conclusion then provides closure in a weirdly obligatory fashion, like it was a necessity rather than a part of the story anybody felt any real inter- est in telling. The cast all mumbles very automatically through some equally au- tomatic dialogue, and it all ends with a Bible quote and some impossibly cheesy nature shots. One is left wondering why anyone considering himself a serious director would choose to tackle such incredibly familiar and polarizing subject matter and then barely break the surface of it; it’s like finally getting your hands on a book you’ve always wanted to read, and then just skimming it or reading the Cliff- sNotes. As I mentioned earlier, Aronofsky seems somewhat intrigued by the idea of Noah’s fable as an environmentalist tale, with Cain’s evil descendants being seen strip-mining the Earth, possibly caus- ing God to initiate the great deluge and thereby making Noah the first climate change activist. If the intention here is to advocate militant environmentalism to the Christian right, then I wish the movie the best of luck; Noah is certainly sim- plistic enough to be understood by fun- damentalists, fraught as it is by one-di- mensional characters, predictable story arcs and everyone getting pretty much what they deserve. Was the point here maybe some sort of genre exercise? Did Aronofsky simply feel like spending $125 million to make a purposely shallow and insipid biblical movie? Is he just the Liam Lynch of film- makers, parodying genres by ridiculing their conventions, like some sort of artsy heir to Abrahams, Zucker and Zucker? Or is he showing us, with his computer- ized rock monsters, prehistoric industrial society and healing magic how ridiculous it is that 2.2 billion people believe such an impossible tale has literal truth? However, the point is somewhat moot, for despite all its multiple smaller shortcomings, the film's chief sin is that it’s boring. No, seriously: it’s fucking boring as shit. Aronofsky simply doesn’t have the energy or the sense of fun to direct a blockbuster adventure film, and the choppy, uneven editing destroys any pacing or gravitas the movie might otherwise have had. It also fails as a mo- rality tale because of its pitiable lack of depth or characters, and it even fails as a purely aesthetic object d’art: as George Lucas learned (or would have learned, if he had listened to anyone other than the massive, talking dollar signs he sees when he closes his eyes), all the special effects in the world don’t mean shit if they don’t have context or atmosphere to contain them. There is some admittedly cool mise-en-scéne on the ark itself as it creaks aimlessly through the deluge, but it’s hardly enough to save this sorry mess of a film. In short, Aronofsky has wronged us, himself and the whole world once again by delivering a thumping wad of ego-tas- tic hyperbole that possesses all the sub- tlety and intricacy of a facial stabbing. It is yet another two-hours-plus of an over- paid film student with nothing interesting to say masturbating teeny-bopper imag- inings vigorously enough to impress only the shallowest and most gullible viewers. It’s so pointless it’s hard even to hate it, and yet, I find I hate it almost as much as I hate all his other movies.
Blaðsíða 1
Blaðsíða 2
Blaðsíða 3
Blaðsíða 4
Blaðsíða 5
Blaðsíða 6
Blaðsíða 7
Blaðsíða 8
Blaðsíða 9
Blaðsíða 10
Blaðsíða 11
Blaðsíða 12
Blaðsíða 13
Blaðsíða 14
Blaðsíða 15
Blaðsíða 16
Blaðsíða 17
Blaðsíða 18
Blaðsíða 19
Blaðsíða 20
Blaðsíða 21
Blaðsíða 22
Blaðsíða 23
Blaðsíða 24
Blaðsíða 25
Blaðsíða 26
Blaðsíða 27
Blaðsíða 28
Blaðsíða 29
Blaðsíða 30
Blaðsíða 31
Blaðsíða 32
Blaðsíða 33
Blaðsíða 34
Blaðsíða 35
Blaðsíða 36
Blaðsíða 37
Blaðsíða 38
Blaðsíða 39
Blaðsíða 40
Blaðsíða 41
Blaðsíða 42
Blaðsíða 43
Blaðsíða 44
Blaðsíða 45
Blaðsíða 46
Blaðsíða 47
Blaðsíða 48
Blaðsíða 49
Blaðsíða 50
Blaðsíða 51
Blaðsíða 52
Blaðsíða 53
Blaðsíða 54
Blaðsíða 55
Blaðsíða 56
Blaðsíða 57
Blaðsíða 58
Blaðsíða 59
Blaðsíða 60
Blaðsíða 61
Blaðsíða 62
Blaðsíða 63
Blaðsíða 64

x

Reykjavík Grapevine

Beinir tenglar

Ef þú vilt tengja á þennan titil, vinsamlegast notaðu þessa tengla:

Tengja á þennan titil: Reykjavík Grapevine
https://timarit.is/publication/943

Tengja á þetta tölublað:

Tengja á þessa síðu:

Tengja á þessa grein:

Vinsamlegast ekki tengja beint á myndir eða PDF skjöl á Tímarit.is þar sem slíkar slóðir geta breyst án fyrirvara. Notið slóðirnar hér fyrir ofan til að tengja á vefinn.