Reykjavík Grapevine - 01.08.2014, Blaðsíða 44

Reykjavík Grapevine - 01.08.2014, Blaðsíða 44
Making The Case For Art In The Time Of Need In 1979 it was considered abnormal behaviour to study art, to become an artist. Icelandic society was still struggling with the big swallowing of abstract painting (a procedure that lasted 30 years), and only a handful of parents could say they were happy seeing their children off to the “Myndlista- og handíðaskólinn.” We’ve come a long way. Today Icelandic parents are almost hoping for their kids to go to art school, to grow long Mugison beards and become the hipsters of the future, the leaders of the next generation. When you look back, you can see that art has made a difference here in Iceland. 2. The Björk Effect I grew up in a very one-sided society: Only one man could be Prime Minister, and he was also the richest man in Iceland, only one man could write in Icelandic, and he was getting very old, only one man (yes, they were all men back then, women were only used for modelling or teaching French on TV) was a good painter, and he lived in Paris, and only one man was good at dancing, and he lived in San Francisco, and no man at all was good at the theatre and absolutely no one at doing films. Well, back then only one film had been made in Iceland, and it was only shown... well, uh... once. Everything was one, once and one- sided. Reykjavík only had one restaurant, one bar, one disco, one radio station, one TV station, one museum, one gallery and one tree (down in Suðurgata). And downtown there was only one man walking around and that was all the street life we had. This man is dead now, bless his soul, but we’ve come a long way from one to one o one. For now we have 101 of everything. One hundred and one restaurants, one hundred and one pubs, one hundred and one writers and one hundred thousand bands. And it was all thanks to one little woman, and her One Little Indian. Yet she was never elected for any office, she never even entered politics, she only had this incredible voice, and a thousand ideas, a thousand ways to use it, and all of them were NEW. Yet she did more for Iceland in thirty years than a hundred politicians in a hundred years. She transformed our culture, raised its standards, pushed it to a higher level, gave it a wider exposure, branded it as trendy for the next fifty years, lifted our spirits and gave us self- esteem. More than anyone it was she who took us from “One Everything Reykjavík” to “One O One Reykjavík.” We should stop talking about before and after the Crash and start talking about before and after Björk. It’s maybe the most radical example in history of how much art can do for a society, how much one little woman can do for her country, how much power art can have. For proof you only need to look at the current Icelandic music scene, from Arnalds to Airwaves, from Samaris to Anna Þorvaldsdóttir. A radio station in the States even did a special best-of list for 2013, with Icelandic bands only. With its music scene Reykjavík is like a small kid with a balloon the size of the Zeppelin airship. The answer to the eternal question why there are so many rock bands in Iceland is obvious. One star creates a thousand. 3. The Man Who Saved Iceland A similar example of the power of the individual is the curious case of Árni Magnússon. In the beginning of the 18th century (his 350th birthday was celebrated last year) he started his quest for finding the old manuscripts, second or third hand copies of The Sagas, first written on calfskin in the 13th century. This, our national treasures, the foundations of our nation, our claim to fame, and the most evident proof of intellectual life in the Northern Hemisphere before the invention of books, all this could have been lost, were it not for the relentless work of this one stubborn man. Árni came around when paper was new in Iceland. People had started preferring neat looking paper manuscripts and printed books, and were fast forgetting about the old and smelly calfskin things. Hard times had even forced people to make shoes and clothes out of the skin pages and, when the cold and the hunger hurt the most, some had even taken to eating The Sagas. (A fitting end to the “Oral Tradition” that created them.) But Mr. Magnússon went all around Iceland, visited every farm he could, searching and asking for lost pages of lost manuscripts. He could see that some world class literature was being lost forever, if nothing would be done about it. Before he died at the age of 66, he managed to collect enough of it to save a whole “civilization.” He practically gave us the Iceland we have today. 4. “Cut Taxes, Kill An Artist” From this we can see how art can influence society. At first sight it may not look like the most necessary thing for a nation, but when you look closer, it might actually be the most important one. For some years the artless people have been telling us: First we need to fix our health system, before we can allow us an art school, a museum, a theatre, or all those artists’ grants. A recent bumper sticker even reads: “Cut Taxes, Kill an Artist.” And sometimes you might actually admit to yourself that art is not totally necessary. I mean, the fishing can go on without it, the taxis will run, the aluminium factories will be OK. Yeah. Let’s admit it. We’re not necessary! We’re just parasites on the back of society! Sucking out blood and money! For our own egoistic careers! And so you lay down in your bed at night, an unnecessary man falling to his unnecessary sleep, and in your unnecessary dream you dream that people are standing outside your house, banging their pots and pans, screaming for their money back, all those grants they gave you over the years, and you spent on rented rooms and bread and butter, in the hope of writing novels and painting paintings. They don’t care about any of it, it’s all shit to them, and now they’re setting fire to your house... And then you wake up from those stupid thoughts and you don’t care if someone says you’re unnecessary, for you realise that art is necessary for you. You just have to be an artist, like some people are farmers and other people are gay. Yeah. It’s a biological thing. It’s the same as with the gay 7%. There will always be that magical 7% of every nation that wants to make art, to do “needless” things: Write Sagas, sing about Human Behaviour or put the sun inside the Tate Modern. And no matter how many Hitlers this planet will see, they’ll never be able to eliminate this 7% need to do unnecessary things. 5. A Featherless Peacock For society, art is like what the feathers are to the peacock. They might not seem necessary to his survival, but if you take them away from him, he’s no longer a peacock. Without his feathers, 44 The Reykjavík GrapevineIssue 11 — 2014ART When I was 20 years old I decided to enter the Icelan- dic School of Arts and Crafts in Reykjavík. My grandfather voiced some doubts, but my parents were OK with it. But one day I met a distant cousin of mine on the bus, who said: “You’re going to the School of Arts and Crafts? Why? You want to learn how to knit?” This was back in 1979, way before Björk and Raggi Kjar- tans. This was the time when you only went to art school because you had this disease, this art disease, this ongoing inner desire to express yourself. It had nothing to do with the hip and the cool. Our art school was lightyears from being the coolest school on the planet, like it has become today. Photo Alisa Kalyanova Words Hallgrímur Helgason The Magnificent 7% Hallgrímur Helgason is an Icelandic writer/artist living in Reykjavík. His last show of paintings, “The His- tory of Icelandic Literature Vol. IV,” at Tveir hrafnar listhús, Reykjavík, was covered in Art Forum by Doug- las Coupland. His books are out in many languages, the best known being ‘101 Reykjavík’ and ‘The Hit- man’s Guide to Housecleaning,’ both available in English. A stage version of his last novel ‘The Woman at 1000°’ will premiere at The Na- tional Theatre in September. The Danish film ‘Comeback,’ based on his screenplay, will premiere early 2015. Who is Hallgrímur Helgason? Illustration Inga María Brynjarsdóttir
Blaðsíða 1
Blaðsíða 2
Blaðsíða 3
Blaðsíða 4
Blaðsíða 5
Blaðsíða 6
Blaðsíða 7
Blaðsíða 8
Blaðsíða 9
Blaðsíða 10
Blaðsíða 11
Blaðsíða 12
Blaðsíða 13
Blaðsíða 14
Blaðsíða 15
Blaðsíða 16
Blaðsíða 17
Blaðsíða 18
Blaðsíða 19
Blaðsíða 20
Blaðsíða 21
Blaðsíða 22
Blaðsíða 23
Blaðsíða 24
Blaðsíða 25
Blaðsíða 26
Blaðsíða 27
Blaðsíða 28
Blaðsíða 29
Blaðsíða 30
Blaðsíða 31
Blaðsíða 32
Blaðsíða 33
Blaðsíða 34
Blaðsíða 35
Blaðsíða 36
Blaðsíða 37
Blaðsíða 38
Blaðsíða 39
Blaðsíða 40
Blaðsíða 41
Blaðsíða 42
Blaðsíða 43
Blaðsíða 44
Blaðsíða 45
Blaðsíða 46
Blaðsíða 47
Blaðsíða 48
Blaðsíða 49
Blaðsíða 50
Blaðsíða 51
Blaðsíða 52
Blaðsíða 53
Blaðsíða 54
Blaðsíða 55
Blaðsíða 56
Blaðsíða 57
Blaðsíða 58
Blaðsíða 59
Blaðsíða 60
Blaðsíða 61
Blaðsíða 62
Blaðsíða 63
Blaðsíða 64
Blaðsíða 65
Blaðsíða 66
Blaðsíða 67
Blaðsíða 68
Blaðsíða 69
Blaðsíða 70
Blaðsíða 71
Blaðsíða 72

x

Reykjavík Grapevine

Beinir tenglar

Ef þú vilt tengja á þennan titil, vinsamlegast notaðu þessa tengla:

Tengja á þennan titil: Reykjavík Grapevine
https://timarit.is/publication/943

Tengja á þetta tölublað:

Tengja á þessa síðu:

Tengja á þessa grein:

Vinsamlegast ekki tengja beint á myndir eða PDF skjöl á Tímarit.is þar sem slíkar slóðir geta breyst án fyrirvara. Notið slóðirnar hér fyrir ofan til að tengja á vefinn.