Reykjavík Grapevine - 09.12.2016, Blaðsíða 16

Reykjavík Grapevine - 09.12.2016, Blaðsíða 16
The Reykjavík Grapevine Issue 18 — 2016 16 For every story we at Grapevine run about asylum seekers and refugees in Iceland, it seems there will almost al- ways be a small but loud contingent of commenters who seem to think people fleeing war zones are a threat to Ice- landic society. As these same talk- ing points keep bobbing up again and again, we thought it might be a good idea to put some of the most common refugee myths to rest, once and for all. Bear in mind this list is not going to shut down trolls. Rather, this is for the benefit of everyone else reading the comments, wherever they may be. Myth 1: “If you let Muslims into your country, everything will go to hell!” There are already about 1,600 Mus- lims living in Iceland. Proportionately speaking, this is about 0.6% of the population (bear in mind Muslims comprise about 1% of the population of the US). They’ve been here for decades. Iceland leans towards the monocul- tural, but we’re not that isolated. Dur- ing these decades of Muslims living in Iceland, we have had exactly zero terror- ist attacks, zero incidences of open pros- elytizing (from Muslims, anyway), and zero incidences wherein Muslims target- ed non-Muslims for any kind of violence. At the same time, Iceland’s language and culture continue to grow and thrive. Further, poll after poll reveals that most Icelanders actually want more asy- lum seekers, showing ill-founded warn- ings are already falling on deaf ears. Myth 2: “Look at what happened in Sweden!!!” Anyone who trots out this meme is re- ally showing their hand. Sweden has been used as a right-wing boogieman for years: a negative example of the con- sequences of feminism, socialism, and now multiculturalism. Critics of these concepts cherry-pick isolated incidences at best, and proffer flat-out lies at worst (e.g. that whole thing about “there are Muslim neighbourhoods in Sweden that the police are afraid to enter” that turned out to be completely false), in or- der to simultaneously insult Swedes and Muslims alike. Leave Sweden out of it. Myth 3: “Islam is not compatible with democracy and tolerance. The whole point of the faith is to conquer others.” The funny thing about this one is that most people who put this idea forward have never actually met any Muslims in a western country—or any country for that matter. Which makes sense, because if they had, they would know that refugees and asylum seekers from Muslim countries came here specifical- ly because there is democracy and hu- man rights here. These are people who felt it was necessary to abandon their home countries, leave behind friends and family, pay thousands of dollars to a smuggler, and go through the agonis- ing asylum process—all because they wanted to live in a democratic country that much. They are, statistically speak- ing, amongst the least likely people to engage in violence against civilians and the state. You should be so lucky as to live amongst refugees; the vast major- ity of terrorist attacks, and the deadliest ones at that, are perpetrated by home- grown extremists. And not all of them are Muslim, either (e.g. Anders Breivik). Myth 4: “Asylum seekers and refugees can’t even prove who they are, or if their stories are true.” People who say this clearly have no familiarity whatsoever with the asy- lum process. Most asylum seekers in Iceland do, in fact, have documenta- tion that backs up their stories—news clippings, official documents, judicial decisions and more can be a part of an asylum seeker’s case file. Unfortu- nately, the Directorate of Immigration (UTL) often chooses not to even open an asylum seeker’s case file, especially if they believe they can deport this per- son based on the Dublin Regulation: an international agreement which gives signatory states the power (but by no means the obligation) to deport asylum seekers back to their previous point of departure in Europe. If any- thing, the burden of proof is on UTL to show that they examined a rejected application thoroughly. It’s true that there are often documentation holes in the stories asylum seekers bring forth, but this by itself does not prove deliberate deception is at play. Corrupt and war-torn countries very often “lose documentation,” either through purposeful cover-ups, or because the building holding said records was bombed. By us. Myth 5: “Look out for incidences of rape and sexual assault increasing with refugees and asylum seekers.” Literally nothing supports this claim. It is based on two fundamental misun- derstandings. The first concerns Swe- den (poor Sweden!) again, in that in re- cent years they have revised their legal definition of rape and sexual assault to be much broader. As a result, reported incidences of sexual assaults increased. Monoculturalists, perhaps unaware that correlation does not imply cau- sation, pair this with the numbers of refugees to Sweden to show that there is a connection when none exists. The second is that racial profiling by the po- lice is very much a thing in Scandina- via, and as such, refugees are overrep- resented in crime statistics in general. Myth 6: “Why don’t they fix things in their own country/pick a country closer to their home country?” The simplistic “why don’t they fix things in their own country” is espe- cially rich when it comes from Ameri- cans—the descendants of refugees who fled religious persecution in their home countries, rather than trying to stay and “fix” things. Moreover, have you seen Syria lately? Try going over there and attempting to “fix things.” Some people are more concerned about saving their lives, and the lives of their families, than engaging in civ- il war. As to why asylum seekers and refugees don’t choose countries closer to home: guess what? The vast major- ity of them do. The countries with the greatest numbers and proportions of refugees are Muslim countries, most of these refugees fleeing the Syrian conflict. Further, other countries in Europe—such as Greece, Italy and Germany—are already packed full of refugees living in terrible conditions, thanks in part to other countries us- ing the Dublin Regulation to send peo- ple backwards in the system. Myth 7: “Iceland should take care of its elderly/disabled/children/poor first.” This one comes up a lot in discussions amongst right-leaning Icelanders, too. It poses a false dilemma, of course; no- body ever raises objections to further funding for the universities because the hospital needs money, too, or vice versa. We have budgets specifically because we recognise that there are multiple things that ought to be paid for simultaneously. Second, there is an argument to be made that deporting people is actually more expensive than granting asylum. One thing is for sure: the costs of housing asylum seekers would be considerably lower if they were allowed to work— something every single asylum seeker that Grapevine has spoken with has ex- pressed the desire to do, even though the law expressly forbids it. Effectively, asylum seekers are not a drain on our re- sources; UTL itself is. Myth 8: “They don’t want to integrate. You’re going to have ghettos!” Categorically false. Refugees who are ex- pressly invited to Iceland are set up with housing within their municipalities, put in contact with employers, get their kids registered in school, and are signed up for Icelandic classes. Asylum seekers, while lacking this kind of social support net- work, are steadfast in their desire to work in Iceland—to pay taxes, to learn the lan- guage, to make friends with Icelanders, and do all the other great stuff the rest of us do every day. What does create ghettos is social apartheid: when you house asy- lum seekers apart from locals, when you won’t let them work, when you provide absolutely no help to gain a footing in the country. Without that support, immi- grants tend to fall back on their own com- munities and isolate themselves from everyone else. It’s Immigration 101 stuff. A discussion about immigration is im- portant, but to have that discussion, we need to be clear on what the facts of the matter actually are. Am I Just Wrong? Common myths about asylum seekers and refugees, debunked NEWS IN BRIEF Fans of Iceland Airwaves and the Icelandic country- side, you’re in luck. This year, the north Icelandic city of Akureyri will be hosted dozens of bands playing at three or four venues during the music festival. While Akureyri has participated in Airwaves in the past with some re- lated events, this effectively makes the town a second location for the festival itself. Good news not just for tourists, but also for northern- based locals who hadn’t been able to travel south for the duration of a music festival. Christmas is right around the cor- ner (as if you needed reminding), and for a lot of people, that means getting yourself a Christmas tree. You may be surprised to learn that only 20% of the trees you buy in Ice- land are actually grown here; the remaining 80% are imported from farms in Denmark. For this rea- son, amongst others, Icelandic tree growers are being encouraged to plant more Christmas trees, if for no other reason than to get a fair stake in the domestic market. Trees are also pretty crucial to things like preventing soil erosion and putting oxygen in the air, so there’s that, too. If you ever needed proof that Ice- land’s crushing defeat of England in the UEFA Euros touched a sore spot, you need look no further than the top UK tweets of 2016, which put that match in the absolute top spot. As many as 128,000 tweets per minute were being hammered out by angry and jubilant football fans alike in the immediate wake of that match, surpassing even Brexit in terms of sheer numbers of tweets. Which, as one colleague here at the Grapevine put it, would be like the Super Bowl out-tweeting the elec- tion of Donald Trump in the US. Words PAUL FONTAINE Illustrations ANATOLI & PLATON @ BLOOMICON Share this article: GPV.IS/AS18 ANALYSIS
Blaðsíða 1
Blaðsíða 2
Blaðsíða 3
Blaðsíða 4
Blaðsíða 5
Blaðsíða 6
Blaðsíða 7
Blaðsíða 8
Blaðsíða 9
Blaðsíða 10
Blaðsíða 11
Blaðsíða 12
Blaðsíða 13
Blaðsíða 14
Blaðsíða 15
Blaðsíða 16
Blaðsíða 17
Blaðsíða 18
Blaðsíða 19
Blaðsíða 20
Blaðsíða 21
Blaðsíða 22
Blaðsíða 23
Blaðsíða 24
Blaðsíða 25
Blaðsíða 26
Blaðsíða 27
Blaðsíða 28
Blaðsíða 29
Blaðsíða 30
Blaðsíða 31
Blaðsíða 32
Blaðsíða 33
Blaðsíða 34
Blaðsíða 35
Blaðsíða 36
Blaðsíða 37
Blaðsíða 38
Blaðsíða 39
Blaðsíða 40
Blaðsíða 41
Blaðsíða 42
Blaðsíða 43
Blaðsíða 44
Blaðsíða 45
Blaðsíða 46
Blaðsíða 47
Blaðsíða 48
Blaðsíða 49
Blaðsíða 50
Blaðsíða 51
Blaðsíða 52
Blaðsíða 53
Blaðsíða 54
Blaðsíða 55
Blaðsíða 56
Blaðsíða 57
Blaðsíða 58
Blaðsíða 59
Blaðsíða 60
Blaðsíða 61
Blaðsíða 62
Blaðsíða 63
Blaðsíða 64

x

Reykjavík Grapevine

Beinir tenglar

Ef þú vilt tengja á þennan titil, vinsamlegast notaðu þessa tengla:

Tengja á þennan titil: Reykjavík Grapevine
https://timarit.is/publication/943

Tengja á þetta tölublað:

Tengja á þessa síðu:

Tengja á þessa grein:

Vinsamlegast ekki tengja beint á myndir eða PDF skjöl á Tímarit.is þar sem slíkar slóðir geta breyst án fyrirvara. Notið slóðirnar hér fyrir ofan til að tengja á vefinn.