Iceland review - 2016, Page 85

Iceland review - 2016, Page 85
ICELAND REVIEW 83 puts an immense strain on existing infra- structure and fragile nature. “It’s a huge task organizing the tourism industry. We must make the country better prepared for welcoming these masses of people, not just haul them in and not know what to do about them.” One of the most disputed issues of the past term was a ten-year agreement on continued state funding for farmers. “There were many good things about it and it can be reviewed after three years,” says Heiða. “Agriculture is impor- tant. In all the countries we compare ourselves to, agriculture is supported. These are funds for consumers, for sub- sidizing products. If we want to import agricultural products, then from where? They are being subsidized by the citi- zens of a different country,” she points out. “Importing food we can produce at home comes at the expense of nature and that’s at odds with the policy of the Left- Greens.” Others are more critical of the agricultural agreement. “We don’t think it’s fair to use tariffs on such a large scale [to protect domestic production] and want to give consumers a choice,” says Pawel of the Reform Party. “We want to cancel production-related funding.” Inga Björk of the Social Democrats agrees. She favors the European Union’s policy on agriculture: “The state isn’t bothered about whether you keep goats or some- thing else, as long as the farm is inhabit- ed all year and some kind of agriculture is practiced. This encourages innovation, whereas in Iceland all funds are spent on dairy and lamb production,” she explains. In the last term, the Independence Party-Progressive Party coalition with- drew Iceland’s membership application to the EU without consulting voters first, going back on their promise before the 2013 election and causing uproar. While Áslaug Arna and Páll Marís stand by their parties’ decision and would not like to resume talks at this point, represent- atives of all the other parties—regard- less of their personal standpoints—sup- port continued talks, or a referendum to determine whether talks should contin- ue. “I want an informed discussion about the pros and cons of EU membership. Where we’re at today, we cannot make an informed decision. We have to make an agreement and then see in black-and- white what membership looks like,” rea- sons Dagný Rut of Bright Future. The Pirate Party is an advocate for radical changes to the administration. “We must restore people’s faith in the authorities and improve the working facilities for the government and parlia- ment. We must make sure that institu- tions function the way they should and put an end to corruption,” says Smári. “We need to make substantial systematic changes to the basic pillars of society.” To the Pirates, this includes revising the Constitution of Iceland, according to the draft presented by the Constitutional Council in 2011. The other interviewees believe that the constitution should be modernized to some extent but are wary of an overhaul. “The constitution should be changed in unity and not in too large steps at a time,” opines Áslaug Arna. IN THE HANDS OF DEMOCRACY The Pirates want go the furthest in terms of direct democracy, for example enabling private citizens to put resolu- tions on parliament’s agenda. In terms of direct democracy, the others mention that the constitution should better define the right of the public to demand nation- al referendums on big issues. “We need to communicate with the people more, although we shouldn’t have referendums on a weekly basis,” says Dagný Rut. Inga Björk questions direct democracy. “It can be damaging if the public doesn’t act responsibly. In the UK, ‘what is the EU?’ was the second-most searched term about the EU following Brexit, which shows that people voted to leave without making an informed decision,” she points out. “I want to make politics a little more enjoyable,” states Áslaug Arna. In addi- tion to bringing fun into politics, she mentions legalizing NPA, user-managed personal service for people with disabil- ities, as a personal goal. “I want individ- P O L I T I C S X
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148

x

Iceland review

Direct Links

If you want to link to this newspaper/magazine, please use these links:

Link to this newspaper/magazine: Iceland review
https://timarit.is/publication/1842

Link to this issue:

Link to this page:

Link to this article:

Please do not link directly to images or PDFs on Timarit.is as such URLs may change without warning. Please use the URLs provided above for linking to the website.