Iceland review - 2016, Side 85

Iceland review - 2016, Side 85
ICELAND REVIEW 83 puts an immense strain on existing infra- structure and fragile nature. “It’s a huge task organizing the tourism industry. We must make the country better prepared for welcoming these masses of people, not just haul them in and not know what to do about them.” One of the most disputed issues of the past term was a ten-year agreement on continued state funding for farmers. “There were many good things about it and it can be reviewed after three years,” says Heiða. “Agriculture is impor- tant. In all the countries we compare ourselves to, agriculture is supported. These are funds for consumers, for sub- sidizing products. If we want to import agricultural products, then from where? They are being subsidized by the citi- zens of a different country,” she points out. “Importing food we can produce at home comes at the expense of nature and that’s at odds with the policy of the Left- Greens.” Others are more critical of the agricultural agreement. “We don’t think it’s fair to use tariffs on such a large scale [to protect domestic production] and want to give consumers a choice,” says Pawel of the Reform Party. “We want to cancel production-related funding.” Inga Björk of the Social Democrats agrees. She favors the European Union’s policy on agriculture: “The state isn’t bothered about whether you keep goats or some- thing else, as long as the farm is inhabit- ed all year and some kind of agriculture is practiced. This encourages innovation, whereas in Iceland all funds are spent on dairy and lamb production,” she explains. In the last term, the Independence Party-Progressive Party coalition with- drew Iceland’s membership application to the EU without consulting voters first, going back on their promise before the 2013 election and causing uproar. While Áslaug Arna and Páll Marís stand by their parties’ decision and would not like to resume talks at this point, represent- atives of all the other parties—regard- less of their personal standpoints—sup- port continued talks, or a referendum to determine whether talks should contin- ue. “I want an informed discussion about the pros and cons of EU membership. Where we’re at today, we cannot make an informed decision. We have to make an agreement and then see in black-and- white what membership looks like,” rea- sons Dagný Rut of Bright Future. The Pirate Party is an advocate for radical changes to the administration. “We must restore people’s faith in the authorities and improve the working facilities for the government and parlia- ment. We must make sure that institu- tions function the way they should and put an end to corruption,” says Smári. “We need to make substantial systematic changes to the basic pillars of society.” To the Pirates, this includes revising the Constitution of Iceland, according to the draft presented by the Constitutional Council in 2011. The other interviewees believe that the constitution should be modernized to some extent but are wary of an overhaul. “The constitution should be changed in unity and not in too large steps at a time,” opines Áslaug Arna. IN THE HANDS OF DEMOCRACY The Pirates want go the furthest in terms of direct democracy, for example enabling private citizens to put resolu- tions on parliament’s agenda. In terms of direct democracy, the others mention that the constitution should better define the right of the public to demand nation- al referendums on big issues. “We need to communicate with the people more, although we shouldn’t have referendums on a weekly basis,” says Dagný Rut. Inga Björk questions direct democracy. “It can be damaging if the public doesn’t act responsibly. In the UK, ‘what is the EU?’ was the second-most searched term about the EU following Brexit, which shows that people voted to leave without making an informed decision,” she points out. “I want to make politics a little more enjoyable,” states Áslaug Arna. In addi- tion to bringing fun into politics, she mentions legalizing NPA, user-managed personal service for people with disabil- ities, as a personal goal. “I want individ- P O L I T I C S X
Side 1
Side 2
Side 3
Side 4
Side 5
Side 6
Side 7
Side 8
Side 9
Side 10
Side 11
Side 12
Side 13
Side 14
Side 15
Side 16
Side 17
Side 18
Side 19
Side 20
Side 21
Side 22
Side 23
Side 24
Side 25
Side 26
Side 27
Side 28
Side 29
Side 30
Side 31
Side 32
Side 33
Side 34
Side 35
Side 36
Side 37
Side 38
Side 39
Side 40
Side 41
Side 42
Side 43
Side 44
Side 45
Side 46
Side 47
Side 48
Side 49
Side 50
Side 51
Side 52
Side 53
Side 54
Side 55
Side 56
Side 57
Side 58
Side 59
Side 60
Side 61
Side 62
Side 63
Side 64
Side 65
Side 66
Side 67
Side 68
Side 69
Side 70
Side 71
Side 72
Side 73
Side 74
Side 75
Side 76
Side 77
Side 78
Side 79
Side 80
Side 81
Side 82
Side 83
Side 84
Side 85
Side 86
Side 87
Side 88
Side 89
Side 90
Side 91
Side 92
Side 93
Side 94
Side 95
Side 96
Side 97
Side 98
Side 99
Side 100
Side 101
Side 102
Side 103
Side 104
Side 105
Side 106
Side 107
Side 108
Side 109
Side 110
Side 111
Side 112
Side 113
Side 114
Side 115
Side 116
Side 117
Side 118
Side 119
Side 120
Side 121
Side 122
Side 123
Side 124
Side 125
Side 126
Side 127
Side 128
Side 129
Side 130
Side 131
Side 132
Side 133
Side 134
Side 135
Side 136
Side 137
Side 138
Side 139
Side 140
Side 141
Side 142
Side 143
Side 144
Side 145
Side 146
Side 147
Side 148

x

Iceland review

Direkte link

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Iceland review
https://timarit.is/publication/1842

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.