Fróðskaparrit - 01.01.1992, Page 35

Fróðskaparrit - 01.01.1992, Page 35
Testing acoustical methods for detection of odontocete whales Bertel Møhl The problem Stock sizes of most odontocete species are hard to get. At present, whaling activities are either banned or existing at such a small scale that no usable data are generated for the traditional methods of population esti- mates. Therefore, sight surveys have now become the dominating inventory method. The detection rate of sight surveys, how- ever, is low (assumed to be 5% in NASS 1989) and not easy to quantify. Sea state, illumination and visibility are obviously influencing detection rate; animal density, diving behaviour and observer experience are also known to be important. Clearly, any measures that serve to increase detec- tion rate will lead to better estimates. Proposed solution Since odontocetes are known as vocally active animals, it has often been proposed to detect them by acoustic means. Quite a number of reports describe methods operat- ing in the low audio frequency range (Thomas etal., 1986). Such methods, how- ever, require a silent ship, running at 4 knt or less. For standard transects as in the NASS- surveys, such speeds are not attrac- tive. Further, the ultrasonic sonar pulses of these animals are not utilised by audio equipment. These pulses have recently been found to be very powerful, with source levels in the 220-230 dB re. 1 pPa range (Au et al., 1988). As background noise in the sea is decreasing with frequen- cy, signal to noise ratio should improve at ultrasonic frequencies. To take advantage of ultrasonic pulses for detection, they have to be converted to audible frequencies. The only online tech- nique available is heterodyning, where a segment of the ultrasonic spectrum is con- verted down by subtraction from a chosen, fixed frequency. In essence, the process is a filter for the spectrum segment in question. For odontocete whistle signals, this can be an efficient technique, yielding outputs with high signal to noise ratios and there- fore large detection ranges. For the broad band sonar pulses, heterodyning is ineffi- cient by filtering out only a small part of the Fróðskaparrit 40. bók (1992): 39-43
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134

x

Fróðskaparrit

Direct Links

If you want to link to this newspaper/magazine, please use these links:

Link to this newspaper/magazine: Fróðskaparrit
https://timarit.is/publication/15

Link to this issue:

Link to this page:

Link to this article:

Please do not link directly to images or PDFs on Timarit.is as such URLs may change without warning. Please use the URLs provided above for linking to the website.