Reykjavík Grapevine - 14.03.2014, Blaðsíða 10

Reykjavík Grapevine - 14.03.2014, Blaðsíða 10
10The Reykjavík Grapevine Issue 3 — 2014 No matter the topic of conversation, the debate will go like this: 320,000 experts will immediately appear, everyone shar- ing their expertise via Facebook. (Yes, where once we used to meet for a coffee and a chat like normal people, Iceland- ers have now, for all intents and purpos- es, replaced human contact and public debates with statuses, links and likes.) But no matter how much heat an issue generates upon its debut, within minutes—before you can even fake an interest—the discussion will have shifted, with camps dividing on whether the issue even merits our time or if our energy would be better spent elsewhere. This is the cue for someone to introduce another conversation into the mix. Some of the experts will dig in, defending the vital significance of the first issue. Other experts will decide the second topic is far more important and will promptly divert their attention. A select few will try to balance both discussions. And then, fi- nally, a notable group of commentators presents itself: the moderators. The Burden Of Sanity Debate anything in Iceland and you are bound to meet a moderator. They’re everywhere—chances are you’re one yourself. Presenting his or herself as the voice of reason, a moderator bears the burden of sanity in the otherwise barbaric world of Iceland’s public debate. Staking a unique and individual claim on reason is a popular pastime in this country. Moderators are inveterate explainers, earnestly pushing others to see reason and change their erroneous ways. Mod- erators will start by explaining that the debate should be better framed. More focused. They lament the lack of fact- based arguments and how hysterical the discussion has become. They will tell you that actually, the issue at hand is quite simple. And if you’d just look deep- er, you’d see that it all comes down to ba- sic principles and is therefore a lot more clean cut than you realise. In a firm, but fatherly way, moderators explain the big picture and remind you that while we all share certain principles, principles that shouldn’t be that hard to live by, we need to be realistic. Be calm, the moderators intone. Don’t get carried away with is- sues that aren’t important. Issues that they don’t find important, that is. Because you see, while moderators are quick to brush off concerns beneath their own notice, they are equally quick to condemn their fellow citizens’ apathy towards those issues they deem to be of great importance. Call for a politician to take some responsibility and you’ll see this in action: a moderator will rarely fail to mention that at sometime in the past you remained silent when some other politician did something completely un- related and not remotely relevant. One Uproar After Another Are Icelanders just addicted to turmoil or is there such a thing as functional de- bate here? These were among the ques- tions that pushed Hjálmar Gíslason, the founder and CEO of Datamarket, to visually map Icelanders’ conversations for 42 days. Every uproar, one after an- other. The resulting graph clearly reveals the short attention span of Icelandic de- bate: a news item will dominate every medium in the country for a few hours before disappearing completely, never to be mentioned again. Almost nothing survives the initial quarrel stage and continues on for a full and comprehen- sive discussion. Instead, attentions are distracted by new outrages, or by outrage at all the outrage. It is important to note that Hjálmar readily admits that his method is in no way scientific nor terribly accurate. And his graph does reveal two topics that outlast the status quo. The first of these revolved around a new governmental bank levy, which appears to be an in- tentionally designed tax-free status for a particular Icelandic bank. The second centred on whether Icelandic politicians should have attended the Sochi Olym- pics. Those two subjects kept people enraged for slightly longer than usual— two whole days. Everything In Moderation Are we Icelanders wasting time and energy by constantly expressing our shock and anger over any and every is- sue which is tossed our way? Yes—noth- ing is gained by this. Equally, nothing is gained by attempting to police everyone but yourself. Perhaps us moderators could spend a little more time focusing on an actual issue instead of harping on the fallacy that is debate in Iceland. Es- pecially given that this is the one topic which Icelanders have already reached an agreement on: We all think it sucks! Icelanders tend to agree on one thing, and one thing only: the horrid state of discourse in this country. Any other topic is automatically polarizing. Find your- self against the wall in any discussion, rest assure you can always hide a lack of knowledge by turning the conversation to the dismal state of the debate. Try it—see how quickly people line up to agree. Here Come The Moderators Icelandic discourse in a nutshell… — By Atli Þór Fanndal Society | Discourse Hjálmar Gíslasson A dinner or lunch at the elevated fourth floor of Harpa concert hall is a destination in itself. Relax and enjoy fine Italian cuisine complemented with a spectacular panoramic view of Reykjavík and the surrounding horizon. UNIQUE EXPERIENCE AND A VIEW LIKE NO OTHER Kolabrautin is on 4th floor Harpa Reservations +354 519 9700 info@kolabrautin.is www.kolabrautin.is ð Aníta Not Selected As Iceland’s Athlete Of The Year The Ljost.is Leak Of Financial Documents The President And PM’s New Year Addresses Þjórsárver Highlands Conservation Increase Rescinded Vine Social Media Stars Appear In Smáralind Shopping Centre 2013 Fatal Plane Crash Recording Aired On Television Minister Of Industry And Her Chocolate Kleinur (Women Who Benefit From Affirmative Action) State-Funded Artist Wages Under Scrutiny Björn Bragi’s Nazi Simile Made During Iceland-Austria Handball Match Ex-PM Geir H. Haarde’s Racist Article Resurfaces After 50 Years Committee Says Revoking The Indexation Of Loans Is Unfeasible Icelandic Politicians Visit Sochi Olympics Interview With Economist Guðrún Johnsen On The Collapse Domestic Data Downloads Charged At Foreign Rate Intestine Content Found In Whale Beer Fiasco Over MP Bank Benefiting From New Bank Levy
Blaðsíða 1
Blaðsíða 2
Blaðsíða 3
Blaðsíða 4
Blaðsíða 5
Blaðsíða 6
Blaðsíða 7
Blaðsíða 8
Blaðsíða 9
Blaðsíða 10
Blaðsíða 11
Blaðsíða 12
Blaðsíða 13
Blaðsíða 14
Blaðsíða 15
Blaðsíða 16
Blaðsíða 17
Blaðsíða 18
Blaðsíða 19
Blaðsíða 20
Blaðsíða 21
Blaðsíða 22
Blaðsíða 23
Blaðsíða 24
Blaðsíða 25
Blaðsíða 26
Blaðsíða 27
Blaðsíða 28
Blaðsíða 29
Blaðsíða 30
Blaðsíða 31
Blaðsíða 32
Blaðsíða 33
Blaðsíða 34
Blaðsíða 35
Blaðsíða 36
Blaðsíða 37
Blaðsíða 38
Blaðsíða 39
Blaðsíða 40
Blaðsíða 41
Blaðsíða 42
Blaðsíða 43
Blaðsíða 44
Blaðsíða 45
Blaðsíða 46
Blaðsíða 47
Blaðsíða 48
Blaðsíða 49
Blaðsíða 50
Blaðsíða 51
Blaðsíða 52
Blaðsíða 53
Blaðsíða 54
Blaðsíða 55
Blaðsíða 56

x

Reykjavík Grapevine

Beinir tenglar

Ef þú vilt tengja á þennan titil, vinsamlegast notaðu þessa tengla:

Tengja á þennan titil: Reykjavík Grapevine
https://timarit.is/publication/943

Tengja á þetta tölublað:

Tengja á þessa síðu:

Tengja á þessa grein:

Vinsamlegast ekki tengja beint á myndir eða PDF skjöl á Tímarit.is þar sem slíkar slóðir geta breyst án fyrirvara. Notið slóðirnar hér fyrir ofan til að tengja á vefinn.