Archaeologia Islandica - 01.01.2004, Side 42

Archaeologia Islandica - 01.01.2004, Side 42
Ragnar Edvardsson, Sophia Perdikaris, Thomas H. McGovern, Noah Zagor & Matthew Waxman by small crews rowing 4 or 6 oared open boats. Exposure and fatigue (especially in winter fisheries) would take a steady toll on the crews, who were regularly described by 18th - 19th century foreign visitors as exceptionally hardy but gen- erally poorly clothed and equipped by contemporary British or Continental standards. Transit time to deep water fishing was important not only for least effort considerations but also for hazard reduction - prolonged survivability of these small open boats (on retum voyage usually heavily overloaded and in winter subject to icing) attempting to ride out a gale on the open sea would be minimal and the only viable option open to a crew caught offshore by bad weather would be to mn for a verstöð landing. Heavy surf and directly onshore wind would make any landing a dangerous "one chance" affair, and would greatly limit the ability of users of the verstöð to launch boats at all. Peninsula locations often provide more options for landing and recovery under different weather conditions than spots deep in a bay or fjord (like the heimræði of Finnbogastaðir). The ideal location for a verstöð thus would involve proximity to deep water, and an ability to successfully launch and recover boats from a variety of bearings in a variety of wind and surf conditions. These marine locational factors may regularly out- weigh the considerations of terrestrial cultural landscape, and a good verstöð location need not be at a good farming location. The verstöðvar (pl.) in the Ámes district in fact all clustered in a rel- atively small area at the end of the Reykjanes peninsula (Figure 8). The area west of the Reykjanes peninsula was a very rich area for both shark and large cod físhing in the early 18th century. Marine catchment circles around these fishing stations, with 20 km as the aver- age distance for a boat with six oars on a single físhing trip, provide some scale. Sizes of boats in the Northwest varied from small boats with two oars to large boats with eight oars. The most common boat in the Northwest was the boat with six oars (Kristjánsson, 1980). The deter- mining factor in locating a verstöð in Ames district thus does appear to follow the broader model. About 80% of the farms in the Ámes district, including the Finnbogastaðir farm, would therefore be too far away from the best deep water fishing grounds, and their local farm fish- ing stations would have been hazardous bases for extensive offshore fishing. During the fishing seasons many accounts describe farmers and farmhands moving to the verstöð to get access to the deep water fishing. In the 18th century the poorer farmer Brandur at Finnbogastaðir had a small boat which he used for inshore fishing "when he could". The richer occupant of the farm Sr. Bjami owned several boats. One boat was used for fishing from the farm itself for domestic use, another spe- cialized in shark fishing at the Gjögur verstöð and Sr. Bjami also owned part in a third boat which was also used for shark fishing. This suggests that one of the Finnbogastaðir farmers was mainly subsistence fishing while the other was fishing on a larger scale, both for com- mercial and domestic consumption. The farmer at Reykjanes and primary tenant 40
Side 1
Side 2
Side 3
Side 4
Side 5
Side 6
Side 7
Side 8
Side 9
Side 10
Side 11
Side 12
Side 13
Side 14
Side 15
Side 16
Side 17
Side 18
Side 19
Side 20
Side 21
Side 22
Side 23
Side 24
Side 25
Side 26
Side 27
Side 28
Side 29
Side 30
Side 31
Side 32
Side 33
Side 34
Side 35
Side 36
Side 37
Side 38
Side 39
Side 40
Side 41
Side 42
Side 43
Side 44
Side 45
Side 46
Side 47
Side 48
Side 49
Side 50
Side 51
Side 52
Side 53
Side 54
Side 55
Side 56
Side 57
Side 58
Side 59
Side 60
Side 61
Side 62
Side 63
Side 64
Side 65
Side 66
Side 67
Side 68
Side 69
Side 70
Side 71
Side 72
Side 73
Side 74
Side 75
Side 76
Side 77
Side 78
Side 79
Side 80
Side 81
Side 82
Side 83
Side 84
Side 85
Side 86
Side 87
Side 88
Side 89
Side 90
Side 91
Side 92
Side 93
Side 94
Side 95
Side 96
Side 97
Side 98
Side 99
Side 100
Side 101
Side 102
Side 103
Side 104
Side 105
Side 106
Side 107
Side 108
Side 109
Side 110
Side 111
Side 112
Side 113
Side 114
Side 115
Side 116
Side 117
Side 118
Side 119
Side 120
Side 121
Side 122
Side 123
Side 124
Side 125
Side 126
Side 127
Side 128
Side 129
Side 130
Side 131
Side 132
Side 133
Side 134
Side 135
Side 136
Side 137
Side 138
Side 139
Side 140
Side 141
Side 142
Side 143
Side 144
Side 145
Side 146
Side 147
Side 148

x

Archaeologia Islandica

Direkte link

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Archaeologia Islandica
https://timarit.is/publication/1160

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.