65° - 01.07.1968, Blaðsíða 26

65° - 01.07.1968, Blaðsíða 26
depends how you look at it. Everything has its price.” In desperation he sought his wife. He had a vague feeling that only one thing could save him now. If they could look into each other’s eyes this minute. If they could cast a glance at each other across this room and all these people. But her back was turned. She was busy pouring out more sherry. Translated by Petur Karhson NATO Continued from page 15 World War I did not quite reach Iceland. The declared military zone in the Atlantic went as far as the Faroes. In spite of the serious blows which some neutrals had suffered during the war, neutrality was still the only refuge of many small states. The League of Nations provided the hope for a safer future. When Denmark and Iceland agreed on the Union Act of 1918, granting Iceland almost com- plete independence, it was provided that Denmark make it known that Iceland was thereafter an independent and eternally neutral state. Iceland was neutral for only 22 years. During this period the submarine and the airplane were technically improved year by year, and Iceland came within their reach. Nazi Germany tried to obtain bases in Iceland for its Lufthansa Airline, but the Icelanders refused. Visits by squadrons of airplanes, submarines and other warships be- came numerous. Anyone with his eyes open could see that Iceland would not remain outside the war zone if a new conflict broke out. In May 1940, the British occupied Iceland primarily to deny it to the Germans who badly needed Atlantic bases. Icelandic authorities pro- tested this breach of the country’s neutrality, but soon began to co-operate with the British in many ways. In July 1941, many months before Pearl Har- bour, Iceland made an agreement with the United States whereby it took over from the British the defence of the island for the duration of the war. By this act the Icelanders formally abandoned the neutrality policy of 1918. At the end of the war the Icelanders were again faced with the question of their future security. At that time everyone had great hopes about the United Nations as an effective system of col- lective security, an ideal solution for a small nation. The United States offered a somewhat different alternative by asking for military bases for 99 years. Under American protection Iceland had been relatively safe and had even prospered during the war. But the American presence in the country had been overwhelming and the social upheaval it had caused was extensive. The Icelanders also felt that permanent military bases granted to a foreign power would be an infringement upon their sovereignty, and they said no to the Ameri- can request. It was, however, impossible to ignore the new strategic importance which technology had given to Iceland. The airfields which had been con- structed during the war could not be removed and would soon serve civil aviation. The largest one, Keflavik, was too big for Iceland to take over and operate on its own. An agreement was made with the Americans on civilian operation of the base. Ill It soon became obvious that the United Nations would not for a long time live up to expectations as a world security system. The victorious powers failed to agree on a settlement of the principal European problems, and in the confusion of the post war years Communist governments were established in country after country in Central- and Eastern Europe. NATO was formed to halt this development and reestablish a balance of power in Europe. Iceland was invited to join this alliance with her neighbours to the east and west. She was strategically placed near the middle of the NATO area on the lifeline by sea and air between Europe and North America. The Althing in March 1949 decided upon mem- bership in NATO by a majority of 39 to 13, harassed by rioting protesters outside. The Great Debate never rose higher than during the weeks before this decision was made. Opposition to NATO membership was of two kinds. First, the Communists fought to keep Iceland out of this new Western alliance. Never before or since have they so openly appeared as fighters for the Communist block of states, calling those who favoured NATO traitors and quislings. The Communists put forth as an alternative that Iceland should ask the Soviet Union, Britain and the United States to guarantee a neutral Ice- land, and no state should be permitted military bases in the country. 24 65 DEGREES

x

65°

Beinir tenglar

Ef þú vilt tengja á þennan titil, vinsamlegast notaðu þessa tengla:

Tengja á þennan titil: 65°
https://timarit.is/publication/1678

Tengja á þetta tölublað:

Tengja á þessa síðu:

Tengja á þessa grein:

Vinsamlegast ekki tengja beint á myndir eða PDF skjöl á Tímarit.is þar sem slíkar slóðir geta breyst án fyrirvara. Notið slóðirnar hér fyrir ofan til að tengja á vefinn.