Iceland review - 2013, Side 82

Iceland review - 2013, Side 82
80 ICELAND REVIEW ing, Einar replies, “Undoubtedly examples can be found whereby utilization of geo- thermal energy has changed over time. If a lot is pumped up, the water level can lower in the area. A new level of equilibrium is often reached, although occasionally the water cools when the water level diminishes because cold water streams in due to a reduc- tion in the geothermal reserve. One must respond to these conditions, for instance by reducing pumping or even by insulating the boreholes better.” The use of geothermal energy for district heat production is generally sustainable, as the heat is used directly and environmental effects are insignificant. gEothErmAl For ElEctricity When geothermal energy is used for produc- ing electricity, the situation is more complex. Only high-temperature areas are used as a source. And it’s difficult to predict how a given geothermal area will respond when exploited for electricity production. Experts can drill boreholes and assess how much energy can be tapped, but in the case of a large area any estimates are pure guesswork. The geothermal power plants at Svartsengi and Nesjavellir in Southwest Iceland both produce a combination of electricity and hot water for district heating. Both were developed in stages and neither has caused problems from an environmental point of view. Both sites were researched thoroughly beforehand. When an environmental impact assessment (EIA) was carried out for two geothermal power plants, including Hverahlíð, not far from the Hellisheiði plant, the National Energy Authority (Orkustofnun) sent the Icelandic National Planning Agency a letter in which they pointed out that considerable uncertainty reigned concerning the com- bined effect of the proposed development of the geothermal resource in the area around Hellisheiði, saying that experience has shown that the nature of the resource places limits on its sustainable utilization. Because the operator of the Hellisheiði plant, Reykjavík Energy, is bound by contract to provide a constant amount of energy, steam from the Hverahlíð site will probably be piped overground to Hellisheiði to make up the deficit. Scientists believe this will present an opportunity to find out how the geothermal area as a whole will react when energy is tapped in different areas. The Hverahlíð site had previously been scheduled for construc- tion as soon as funding was available, but Reykjavík Energy had been forced to delay construction of the plant until a solution has been found to the excessive levels of hydrogen sulfide that emanate from the Hellisheiði plant due to the vicinity of the magma chamber to the geothermal system. This will take time. One way of recharging a system is to rein- ject waste steam back into the ground. This has worked well with the Svartsengi plant, but when waste steam has been reinjected into the ground to a depth of 800 m (2,620 ft) in an attempt to recharge the energy reserves around Hellisheiði, the experiment has worked in some boreholes but not in others. The process has also caused a series of earthquakes. thE ProBlEm oF hydroPowEr The original hydropower stations tapped lakes such as Þingvallavatn and Mývatn, which have no glacial input. Some sort of water collection system is needed in these cases, such as a reser- voir. However, “this sort of power plant would not be agreed these days due to its environ- mental impact,” says Sveinbjörn Björnsson from the National Energy Authority. The glacial rivers that are now used for hydropower in Iceland carry a great deal of sand and silt. “Silt deposits are not a problem for power stations that should last for 200-300 years. After that the glaciers will have changed anyway if current climate trends continue,” Sveinbjörn continues. With hydropower stations, the size of the plant is not important when it comes to sus- tainability. Ragnheiður Ólafsdóttir, environ- mental manager at Landsvirkjun, the national power company, says they are working with the Hydropower Sustainability Assessment Hellisheiðarvirkjun. p h o to B y g e ir ó la fs s o n ENERGY
Side 1
Side 2
Side 3
Side 4
Side 5
Side 6
Side 7
Side 8
Side 9
Side 10
Side 11
Side 12
Side 13
Side 14
Side 15
Side 16
Side 17
Side 18
Side 19
Side 20
Side 21
Side 22
Side 23
Side 24
Side 25
Side 26
Side 27
Side 28
Side 29
Side 30
Side 31
Side 32
Side 33
Side 34
Side 35
Side 36
Side 37
Side 38
Side 39
Side 40
Side 41
Side 42
Side 43
Side 44
Side 45
Side 46
Side 47
Side 48
Side 49
Side 50
Side 51
Side 52
Side 53
Side 54
Side 55
Side 56
Side 57
Side 58
Side 59
Side 60
Side 61
Side 62
Side 63
Side 64
Side 65
Side 66
Side 67
Side 68
Side 69
Side 70
Side 71
Side 72
Side 73
Side 74
Side 75
Side 76
Side 77
Side 78
Side 79
Side 80
Side 81
Side 82
Side 83
Side 84
Side 85
Side 86
Side 87
Side 88
Side 89
Side 90
Side 91
Side 92
Side 93
Side 94
Side 95
Side 96
Side 97
Side 98
Side 99
Side 100
Side 101
Side 102
Side 103
Side 104
Side 105
Side 106
Side 107
Side 108
Side 109
Side 110
Side 111
Side 112
Side 113
Side 114
Side 115
Side 116

x

Iceland review

Direkte link

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Iceland review
https://timarit.is/publication/1842

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.