Iceland review - 2013, Page 82

Iceland review - 2013, Page 82
80 ICELAND REVIEW ing, Einar replies, “Undoubtedly examples can be found whereby utilization of geo- thermal energy has changed over time. If a lot is pumped up, the water level can lower in the area. A new level of equilibrium is often reached, although occasionally the water cools when the water level diminishes because cold water streams in due to a reduc- tion in the geothermal reserve. One must respond to these conditions, for instance by reducing pumping or even by insulating the boreholes better.” The use of geothermal energy for district heat production is generally sustainable, as the heat is used directly and environmental effects are insignificant. gEothErmAl For ElEctricity When geothermal energy is used for produc- ing electricity, the situation is more complex. Only high-temperature areas are used as a source. And it’s difficult to predict how a given geothermal area will respond when exploited for electricity production. Experts can drill boreholes and assess how much energy can be tapped, but in the case of a large area any estimates are pure guesswork. The geothermal power plants at Svartsengi and Nesjavellir in Southwest Iceland both produce a combination of electricity and hot water for district heating. Both were developed in stages and neither has caused problems from an environmental point of view. Both sites were researched thoroughly beforehand. When an environmental impact assessment (EIA) was carried out for two geothermal power plants, including Hverahlíð, not far from the Hellisheiði plant, the National Energy Authority (Orkustofnun) sent the Icelandic National Planning Agency a letter in which they pointed out that considerable uncertainty reigned concerning the com- bined effect of the proposed development of the geothermal resource in the area around Hellisheiði, saying that experience has shown that the nature of the resource places limits on its sustainable utilization. Because the operator of the Hellisheiði plant, Reykjavík Energy, is bound by contract to provide a constant amount of energy, steam from the Hverahlíð site will probably be piped overground to Hellisheiði to make up the deficit. Scientists believe this will present an opportunity to find out how the geothermal area as a whole will react when energy is tapped in different areas. The Hverahlíð site had previously been scheduled for construc- tion as soon as funding was available, but Reykjavík Energy had been forced to delay construction of the plant until a solution has been found to the excessive levels of hydrogen sulfide that emanate from the Hellisheiði plant due to the vicinity of the magma chamber to the geothermal system. This will take time. One way of recharging a system is to rein- ject waste steam back into the ground. This has worked well with the Svartsengi plant, but when waste steam has been reinjected into the ground to a depth of 800 m (2,620 ft) in an attempt to recharge the energy reserves around Hellisheiði, the experiment has worked in some boreholes but not in others. The process has also caused a series of earthquakes. thE ProBlEm oF hydroPowEr The original hydropower stations tapped lakes such as Þingvallavatn and Mývatn, which have no glacial input. Some sort of water collection system is needed in these cases, such as a reser- voir. However, “this sort of power plant would not be agreed these days due to its environ- mental impact,” says Sveinbjörn Björnsson from the National Energy Authority. The glacial rivers that are now used for hydropower in Iceland carry a great deal of sand and silt. “Silt deposits are not a problem for power stations that should last for 200-300 years. After that the glaciers will have changed anyway if current climate trends continue,” Sveinbjörn continues. With hydropower stations, the size of the plant is not important when it comes to sus- tainability. Ragnheiður Ólafsdóttir, environ- mental manager at Landsvirkjun, the national power company, says they are working with the Hydropower Sustainability Assessment Hellisheiðarvirkjun. p h o to B y g e ir ó la fs s o n ENERGY
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116

x

Iceland review

Direct Links

If you want to link to this newspaper/magazine, please use these links:

Link to this newspaper/magazine: Iceland review
https://timarit.is/publication/1842

Link to this issue:

Link to this page:

Link to this article:

Please do not link directly to images or PDFs on Timarit.is as such URLs may change without warning. Please use the URLs provided above for linking to the website.