Archaeologia Islandica - 01.01.2007, Side 15

Archaeologia Islandica - 01.01.2007, Side 15
Medieval and early modern Beads from Iceland competed with Venice in exports until late in the 16th century (Kidd 1979:17-18 and Karklins 1974:64). After Venice, two major centers in Europe also produced glass beads on a large scale: Amsterdam from the late 16th to the middle of the 18th century (aided by immigrant Italian glass- workers) and Bohemia. The latter region produced glass beads ífom an early date but large-scale production began in the middle of the 16th century. By the latter half of the 17th century the Bohemian workshops had commenced large-scale trade in beads to various countries, first within Europe but by the second half of the 18th century well beyond. The Czech glass bead industry developed rapidly in the 19th century as new machines were developed to process molten glass into a heated mould, producing faceted bead types which became their specialty. By the 18th century Venice and Bohemia (and to the second half of the century Amster- dam) continued to dominate the interna- tional trade into the 20th century (Kidd 1979, Dublin 1998 and Sleen 1967). Despite increased competition, the Venetian glass industry reached its peak in the 17th and 18th centuries; a recorded 20.000 kg of beads were being produced per week in 22 furnaces in 1764 (Kidd 1979:19; also see Tivellato 2001, Kidd 1979; Mackenney 1987 and Sciama 2001 for more background to the Venice bead industry). Even if Venice, Bohemia (and for a while Amsterdam) were by far the largest production centres of glass beads in post-medieval times, other Euro- pean countries such as England, France, Austria and Germany did produce some beads. Many of these produced similar bead types and up to this point a guide- line to establish where types of glass bead from this period were made has not been put forward. The fact that little compara- tive material is available makes it difficult to determine with certainty where many types of glass beads were manufactured. Attempts to use chemical composition to determine the origin of glass beads have been made but have not proven very suc- cessful (Karklins 1985:114). Connected to this is the fact that no overall chronol- ogy has been established for post-medi- eval glass beads. Still indications about the dating and the origin of the beads can sometimes be gained by reviewing mate- rial that has been researched in America, Canada, Africa and elsewhere. A few col- lections of beads, for example the Levin Catalogue and A sample book of 19th century Venetian beads (Spague 1985) are also helpful to establish time frames, as well as beads from securely dated archae- ological contexts from various excava- tions, for example from the Netherlands (Karklins 1974). Classification of glass beads The principal approach to classifying glass beads is by the method of manu- facture. Thereafter, colour, decoration, shape, size, translucency etc. are consid- ered. Moreover, the size of the bead also gives a general indication of its usage: beads with a diameter less than 6 mm are often embroidery beads while those larger than 6 mm are more often pieces of necklaces or other decoration (Karklins 1985:115). This is of course a simplifica- tion as larger and smaller beads can have different functions; nonetheless, accord- ing to this distinction, about half of the Icelandic glass beads from later times are likely to have been from embroideries. The most basic classification of glass beads divides them into two major groups of manufacture: wound beads 13
Side 1
Side 2
Side 3
Side 4
Side 5
Side 6
Side 7
Side 8
Side 9
Side 10
Side 11
Side 12
Side 13
Side 14
Side 15
Side 16
Side 17
Side 18
Side 19
Side 20
Side 21
Side 22
Side 23
Side 24
Side 25
Side 26
Side 27
Side 28
Side 29
Side 30
Side 31
Side 32
Side 33
Side 34
Side 35
Side 36
Side 37
Side 38
Side 39
Side 40
Side 41
Side 42
Side 43
Side 44
Side 45
Side 46
Side 47
Side 48
Side 49
Side 50
Side 51
Side 52
Side 53
Side 54
Side 55
Side 56
Side 57
Side 58
Side 59
Side 60
Side 61
Side 62
Side 63
Side 64
Side 65
Side 66
Side 67
Side 68
Side 69
Side 70
Side 71
Side 72
Side 73
Side 74
Side 75
Side 76
Side 77
Side 78
Side 79
Side 80
Side 81
Side 82
Side 83
Side 84
Side 85
Side 86
Side 87
Side 88
Side 89
Side 90
Side 91
Side 92
Side 93
Side 94
Side 95
Side 96
Side 97
Side 98
Side 99
Side 100
Side 101
Side 102
Side 103
Side 104

x

Archaeologia Islandica

Direkte link

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Archaeologia Islandica
https://timarit.is/publication/1160

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.