Archaeologia Islandica - 01.01.2007, Side 51

Archaeologia Islandica - 01.01.2007, Side 51
Ancient ironmaking in Iceland, Greenland and Newfoundland Figure 1. Routes by the Norsemen after year 1991: íslenskur Söguatlas, by permission. uniform dimensions. In each of the com- munities Vinje and Fyresdal in Telemark, Vestre Gausdal/Dokka in Oppland and Ámot, Hedmark some 100 bloomery sites have been registered, leading to an estimat- ed total of some 10,000 in South Norway (Martens et al. 1988, Espelund 2004 b, Larsen 1991, Stene & al. 2005). The slag was tapped at or above ground level. It is black and dense, not expressing gas evolu- tion during solidification (in contrast to the “Evenstad” process, in use from about AD 1400-1800). The blooms produced were named blásturjárn and fellujárn, accord- ing to Jónsbók, a law issued by king Mag- nus Lagaboter in Norway and approved by the Allthing in Iceland in the year 1281. Such blooms, weighing some 5 to 10 kg can be found in the museum of Oldsak- samlingen (now KHM) in Oslo (Martens 1979, Espelund 1998/99) and also in the National Museum in Reykjavík. Modern ironmaking is in princi- ple easy and very efficient due to smelt- Pink area uninhabited. After Júlíusson & al, ing taking place in two steps and involv- ing liquid metal. A high output is secured in the first step while the required qual- ity is the aim of the second step. In con- trast small scale ironmaking leading in a single step directly to iron that could be forged was difficult, barely replicable in our times. Therefore the value of the metal was high and much prestige was connected with ironmaking. As a conse- quence, ironmaking and smithing in fairy tales are often attributed to goblins. For an archaeometallurgist who has studied ironmaking in Norway, Ice- land provides a very valuable supplement to ongoing research. The continuity in technology seems to prove that immi- grants from Norway brought the method, documented in Norway from Meroving- ian time, to their new homeland. The raw materials were a bit different, and it appears that the process itself underwent modifications. The sites lie mostly close to farms, expressing an integration into 1000. 49
Side 1
Side 2
Side 3
Side 4
Side 5
Side 6
Side 7
Side 8
Side 9
Side 10
Side 11
Side 12
Side 13
Side 14
Side 15
Side 16
Side 17
Side 18
Side 19
Side 20
Side 21
Side 22
Side 23
Side 24
Side 25
Side 26
Side 27
Side 28
Side 29
Side 30
Side 31
Side 32
Side 33
Side 34
Side 35
Side 36
Side 37
Side 38
Side 39
Side 40
Side 41
Side 42
Side 43
Side 44
Side 45
Side 46
Side 47
Side 48
Side 49
Side 50
Side 51
Side 52
Side 53
Side 54
Side 55
Side 56
Side 57
Side 58
Side 59
Side 60
Side 61
Side 62
Side 63
Side 64
Side 65
Side 66
Side 67
Side 68
Side 69
Side 70
Side 71
Side 72
Side 73
Side 74
Side 75
Side 76
Side 77
Side 78
Side 79
Side 80
Side 81
Side 82
Side 83
Side 84
Side 85
Side 86
Side 87
Side 88
Side 89
Side 90
Side 91
Side 92
Side 93
Side 94
Side 95
Side 96
Side 97
Side 98
Side 99
Side 100
Side 101
Side 102
Side 103
Side 104

x

Archaeologia Islandica

Direkte link

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Archaeologia Islandica
https://timarit.is/publication/1160

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.