Archaeologia Islandica - 01.01.2007, Page 51

Archaeologia Islandica - 01.01.2007, Page 51
Ancient ironmaking in Iceland, Greenland and Newfoundland Figure 1. Routes by the Norsemen after year 1991: íslenskur Söguatlas, by permission. uniform dimensions. In each of the com- munities Vinje and Fyresdal in Telemark, Vestre Gausdal/Dokka in Oppland and Ámot, Hedmark some 100 bloomery sites have been registered, leading to an estimat- ed total of some 10,000 in South Norway (Martens et al. 1988, Espelund 2004 b, Larsen 1991, Stene & al. 2005). The slag was tapped at or above ground level. It is black and dense, not expressing gas evolu- tion during solidification (in contrast to the “Evenstad” process, in use from about AD 1400-1800). The blooms produced were named blásturjárn and fellujárn, accord- ing to Jónsbók, a law issued by king Mag- nus Lagaboter in Norway and approved by the Allthing in Iceland in the year 1281. Such blooms, weighing some 5 to 10 kg can be found in the museum of Oldsak- samlingen (now KHM) in Oslo (Martens 1979, Espelund 1998/99) and also in the National Museum in Reykjavík. Modern ironmaking is in princi- ple easy and very efficient due to smelt- Pink area uninhabited. After Júlíusson & al, ing taking place in two steps and involv- ing liquid metal. A high output is secured in the first step while the required qual- ity is the aim of the second step. In con- trast small scale ironmaking leading in a single step directly to iron that could be forged was difficult, barely replicable in our times. Therefore the value of the metal was high and much prestige was connected with ironmaking. As a conse- quence, ironmaking and smithing in fairy tales are often attributed to goblins. For an archaeometallurgist who has studied ironmaking in Norway, Ice- land provides a very valuable supplement to ongoing research. The continuity in technology seems to prove that immi- grants from Norway brought the method, documented in Norway from Meroving- ian time, to their new homeland. The raw materials were a bit different, and it appears that the process itself underwent modifications. The sites lie mostly close to farms, expressing an integration into 1000. 49
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104

x

Archaeologia Islandica

Direct Links

If you want to link to this newspaper/magazine, please use these links:

Link to this newspaper/magazine: Archaeologia Islandica
https://timarit.is/publication/1160

Link to this issue:

Link to this page:

Link to this article:

Please do not link directly to images or PDFs on Timarit.is as such URLs may change without warning. Please use the URLs provided above for linking to the website.