Iceland review - 2015, Side 46

Iceland review - 2015, Side 46
44 ICELAND REVIEW meat, meat preparation and other meat products is in breach of EEa law and an unjustified trade barrier. The opinion will likely be heard by the EFTa Court, as the Icelandic government argues that the barrier is a security measure. “For 11 centuries we have had special breeds of farm animals in Iceland, different from the breeds in the rest of Europe,” explains Sigurður. The concern is that if fresh meat containing harmful bacteria enters stores in spite of health checks—of which there have been examples in other countries—it might come in contact with farm animals and cause an epidemic. “as in the case of the horse flu,” says Sigurður. In 2010, the majority of riding horses in Iceland fell ill and some died due to a previously unknown bacteria entering the country, perhaps with dirty riding gear. “I’m a veterinarian, so I know what I’m talking about,” the minister stresses. By only allowing the import of frozen meat, Icelandic authorities have a 30-day buffer to respond, he reasons. Not only the ESa has criticized this rea- soning; the measure is heatedly debated in Iceland. “It sounds like scare tactics,” says Ástvaldur, who believes it’s only a matter of time before freer import of agricul- tural products will be permitted and that Icelandic farmers must be better prepared to handle the competition. “No country allows unlimited import,” states Sigurður, “it would simply be bad business.” as an example, he mentions negotiations cur- rently taking place with the Eu. Today, 380 tons of skyr, an Icelandic dairy product, are imported to the Eu without tariffs and Iceland would like it to increase to 4,000 tons. However, in turn, the Eu expects Iceland to import a comparable amount of a product made in member countries, which would be much harder for the small Icelandic market to handle, the minister maintains. However, Ástvaldur, Daði and others have pointed out that when the importa- tion tariffs on cucumbers, tomatoes and bell peppers were lifted in 2002, the green- house vegetable sector was quick to recover after the original setback, especially in the case of cucumbers, where domestic producers now hold a 93 percent market share. Simultaneously, the consumer price dropped by 40 to 60 percent. “at the same time all-year lighting became a viable option because of cheaper electricity,” men- tions Sigurður. Direct payment and other support measures were introduced at the same time. “The garden plant market col- lapsed,” the minister adds of a sector which underwent a similar development but was not as successful. Haraldur attributes the success of greenhouse vegetable producers to a health awakening and an effective mar- keting initiative, highlighting the products’ local origins. a giant’S reSPonSibilitieS In September, the Icelandic Competition authority (ICa) fined Mjólkursamsalan (MS), which holds a 99 percent share on the Icelandic dairy market, ISk 370 million (uSD 3 million) for bullying competitors and abusing its dominant position on the market. The ICa concluded that MS sold raw milk to its smaller competitors at a price 17 percent higher than to firms con- nected with MS. Claiming that the com- pany is operating within the legal frame- work of the dairy industry—it is exempt from certain competition laws—MS has appealed the decision. “production companies have grown into giants, taking over the market. after a certain point, they hinder competition and diversity in production. What you get is a basic product sold at the minimum price,” says Ástvaldur. “If it turns out that MS violated competition laws, it won’t be toler- ated,” announces Sigurður. MS is the giant of the Icelandic dairy industry, equivalent to Denmark-based arla, the third-largest cooperative dairy company in the world, and Tine in Norway. These giants are considered a necessity, not only by the authorities but also small-scale dairy pro- ducers, Daði explains. Collecting milk from dairy farms is expensive and complicated and small-scale producers cannot commit to that. “Tine too was found to have hin- dered competition and that was handled by the authorities,” adds Haraldur. Now an environment has been created in Norway FArmiNG innovation meets tradition at vogar, Mývatnssveit, north iceland, a dairy and sheep farm, guesthouse and cowshed café.
Side 1
Side 2
Side 3
Side 4
Side 5
Side 6
Side 7
Side 8
Side 9
Side 10
Side 11
Side 12
Side 13
Side 14
Side 15
Side 16
Side 17
Side 18
Side 19
Side 20
Side 21
Side 22
Side 23
Side 24
Side 25
Side 26
Side 27
Side 28
Side 29
Side 30
Side 31
Side 32
Side 33
Side 34
Side 35
Side 36
Side 37
Side 38
Side 39
Side 40
Side 41
Side 42
Side 43
Side 44
Side 45
Side 46
Side 47
Side 48
Side 49
Side 50
Side 51
Side 52
Side 53
Side 54
Side 55
Side 56
Side 57
Side 58
Side 59
Side 60
Side 61
Side 62
Side 63
Side 64
Side 65
Side 66
Side 67
Side 68
Side 69
Side 70
Side 71
Side 72
Side 73
Side 74
Side 75
Side 76
Side 77
Side 78
Side 79
Side 80
Side 81
Side 82
Side 83
Side 84
Side 85
Side 86
Side 87
Side 88
Side 89
Side 90
Side 91
Side 92
Side 93
Side 94
Side 95
Side 96
Side 97
Side 98
Side 99
Side 100
Side 101
Side 102
Side 103
Side 104
Side 105
Side 106
Side 107
Side 108
Side 109
Side 110
Side 111
Side 112
Side 113
Side 114
Side 115
Side 116

x

Iceland review

Direkte link

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Iceland review
https://timarit.is/publication/1842

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.