Iceland review - 2015, Page 46

Iceland review - 2015, Page 46
44 ICELAND REVIEW meat, meat preparation and other meat products is in breach of EEa law and an unjustified trade barrier. The opinion will likely be heard by the EFTa Court, as the Icelandic government argues that the barrier is a security measure. “For 11 centuries we have had special breeds of farm animals in Iceland, different from the breeds in the rest of Europe,” explains Sigurður. The concern is that if fresh meat containing harmful bacteria enters stores in spite of health checks—of which there have been examples in other countries—it might come in contact with farm animals and cause an epidemic. “as in the case of the horse flu,” says Sigurður. In 2010, the majority of riding horses in Iceland fell ill and some died due to a previously unknown bacteria entering the country, perhaps with dirty riding gear. “I’m a veterinarian, so I know what I’m talking about,” the minister stresses. By only allowing the import of frozen meat, Icelandic authorities have a 30-day buffer to respond, he reasons. Not only the ESa has criticized this rea- soning; the measure is heatedly debated in Iceland. “It sounds like scare tactics,” says Ástvaldur, who believes it’s only a matter of time before freer import of agricul- tural products will be permitted and that Icelandic farmers must be better prepared to handle the competition. “No country allows unlimited import,” states Sigurður, “it would simply be bad business.” as an example, he mentions negotiations cur- rently taking place with the Eu. Today, 380 tons of skyr, an Icelandic dairy product, are imported to the Eu without tariffs and Iceland would like it to increase to 4,000 tons. However, in turn, the Eu expects Iceland to import a comparable amount of a product made in member countries, which would be much harder for the small Icelandic market to handle, the minister maintains. However, Ástvaldur, Daði and others have pointed out that when the importa- tion tariffs on cucumbers, tomatoes and bell peppers were lifted in 2002, the green- house vegetable sector was quick to recover after the original setback, especially in the case of cucumbers, where domestic producers now hold a 93 percent market share. Simultaneously, the consumer price dropped by 40 to 60 percent. “at the same time all-year lighting became a viable option because of cheaper electricity,” men- tions Sigurður. Direct payment and other support measures were introduced at the same time. “The garden plant market col- lapsed,” the minister adds of a sector which underwent a similar development but was not as successful. Haraldur attributes the success of greenhouse vegetable producers to a health awakening and an effective mar- keting initiative, highlighting the products’ local origins. a giant’S reSPonSibilitieS In September, the Icelandic Competition authority (ICa) fined Mjólkursamsalan (MS), which holds a 99 percent share on the Icelandic dairy market, ISk 370 million (uSD 3 million) for bullying competitors and abusing its dominant position on the market. The ICa concluded that MS sold raw milk to its smaller competitors at a price 17 percent higher than to firms con- nected with MS. Claiming that the com- pany is operating within the legal frame- work of the dairy industry—it is exempt from certain competition laws—MS has appealed the decision. “production companies have grown into giants, taking over the market. after a certain point, they hinder competition and diversity in production. What you get is a basic product sold at the minimum price,” says Ástvaldur. “If it turns out that MS violated competition laws, it won’t be toler- ated,” announces Sigurður. MS is the giant of the Icelandic dairy industry, equivalent to Denmark-based arla, the third-largest cooperative dairy company in the world, and Tine in Norway. These giants are considered a necessity, not only by the authorities but also small-scale dairy pro- ducers, Daði explains. Collecting milk from dairy farms is expensive and complicated and small-scale producers cannot commit to that. “Tine too was found to have hin- dered competition and that was handled by the authorities,” adds Haraldur. Now an environment has been created in Norway FArmiNG innovation meets tradition at vogar, Mývatnssveit, north iceland, a dairy and sheep farm, guesthouse and cowshed café.
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116

x

Iceland review

Direct Links

If you want to link to this newspaper/magazine, please use these links:

Link to this newspaper/magazine: Iceland review
https://timarit.is/publication/1842

Link to this issue:

Link to this page:

Link to this article:

Please do not link directly to images or PDFs on Timarit.is as such URLs may change without warning. Please use the URLs provided above for linking to the website.