Iceland review - 2015, Side 48

Iceland review - 2015, Side 48
46 ICELAND REVIEW Good Cop, Bad Cop On the successes, failures and ongoing challenges of the police in Iceland. By Zoë robert. PHoToS FRoM THE reykJavík MetroPolitan Police on inStagraM. ILLUSTRATIoN By erlingUr Páll ingvarSSon The Reykjavík Metropolitan police have managed to build up a large online following through their innovative and humorous approach to social media. Former Reykjavík Chief of police Stefán Eiríksson, under whom the project began, attributed its success to, among other things, the fact that police in Iceland are unarmed and that the police have a good relationship with the public. In October, news broke that all this was about to change: that cops in Iceland would start carrying guns. although, the suggestion that a policy change was on the horizon was staunchly denied by police, the issue brought up some pertinent questions about the future of law enforcement in Iceland and what sort of society Icelanders envision and strive for. The police’s image was put to the test with some wondering how they could manage to juggle playing both the friendly cop most Icelanders have come to know in recent years and the cop tough on preventing crime—now armed with a semi- automatic weapon. a fareWell to arMS? In October it was reported that roughly 250 Heckler & koch Mp5 9mm subma- chine guns, with a rate of fire of 700 to 900 rounds per minute, had been acquired from the Norwegian military. around 150 of the guns were said to be on their way to the National Commissioner of the Icelandic police, and the remaining 100 intended for the Icelandic Coast Guard for use aboard its ships and for spare parts. Snorri Magnússon, chair of the police Federation of Iceland, explained that the police force has had guns for many years—although general police officers don’t carry them, only have access to them—but needed to renew its stock of weapons. Former police officer and current Mp for the Independence party Vilhjálmur Árnason was among those who came to the police’s defense, arguing that the Mp5 has only the same capabilities as the Glock pistol, which the police are already equipped with, unless you change the settings, which he said the police would never do. He described the Mp5 as “a safer weapon, with a special aim- ing device.” The issue dominated headlines in Iceland for weeks and was also covered by the Norwegian press. apart from whether the guns marked a major policy change in the arming of police officers in Iceland, there was much confusion about whether the guns were a gift from the Norwegian state, as officials in Iceland had claimed, or whether they had been purchased, and if so why parliamentarians and the police knew nothing about it. From the beginning, the Norwegians insisted that the guns were not a gift—even though in 2011 Norway sent 50 submachine guns to Iceland without a request for payment—stating that a bill was on its way. If it turned out they were not a gift, they would be returned, director of the Icelandic Coast Guard Georg lárusson responded. according to Halla Bergþóra Björnsdóttir, head of the Icelandic association of police and police commissioner in akranes, West Iceland, the decision as to whether police in different regions of Iceland would have access to the guns, and whether they would be kept at the local police station or in police cars, would be at the discretion of the police commissioners of each region. In an interview with RÚV in October, she however pointed out that the association had not yet debated the issue and that therefore a decision on the matter had yet to be made. Snorri emphasized that there has been no fundamental change in the police’s policy on carrying weapons, contrary to sugges- tions by newspaper DV, which broke the original story. Because Iceland neither has a military nor national guard, it’s important for the country to possess the equipment necessary to respond to potential threats, he argued. PUblic backlaSH The idea didn’t sit well with much of the public and the matter led to a major backlash. around 9,000 people ‘liked’ a Facebook page ‘Return the Guns’ set up in protest over the issue and it was among those highlighted at a series of anti-govern- ment protests in November. In the end, and after it became clear that Iceland would indeed have to pay for them, the guns were returned, but that didn’t put an end to the discussion. Jón Bjartmarz, chief superintendent at the National Commissioner of the Icelandic police, told national broadcaster RÚV that it was important for the police to have
Side 1
Side 2
Side 3
Side 4
Side 5
Side 6
Side 7
Side 8
Side 9
Side 10
Side 11
Side 12
Side 13
Side 14
Side 15
Side 16
Side 17
Side 18
Side 19
Side 20
Side 21
Side 22
Side 23
Side 24
Side 25
Side 26
Side 27
Side 28
Side 29
Side 30
Side 31
Side 32
Side 33
Side 34
Side 35
Side 36
Side 37
Side 38
Side 39
Side 40
Side 41
Side 42
Side 43
Side 44
Side 45
Side 46
Side 47
Side 48
Side 49
Side 50
Side 51
Side 52
Side 53
Side 54
Side 55
Side 56
Side 57
Side 58
Side 59
Side 60
Side 61
Side 62
Side 63
Side 64
Side 65
Side 66
Side 67
Side 68
Side 69
Side 70
Side 71
Side 72
Side 73
Side 74
Side 75
Side 76
Side 77
Side 78
Side 79
Side 80
Side 81
Side 82
Side 83
Side 84
Side 85
Side 86
Side 87
Side 88
Side 89
Side 90
Side 91
Side 92
Side 93
Side 94
Side 95
Side 96
Side 97
Side 98
Side 99
Side 100
Side 101
Side 102
Side 103
Side 104
Side 105
Side 106
Side 107
Side 108
Side 109
Side 110
Side 111
Side 112
Side 113
Side 114
Side 115
Side 116

x

Iceland review

Direkte link

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Iceland review
https://timarit.is/publication/1842

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.