Jökull


Jökull - 01.12.1987, Blaðsíða 72

Jökull - 01.12.1987, Blaðsíða 72
margin where meltwater entered the sea from subglacial tunnels. The change in texture and fabric, upwards with- in the esker sediments, could reflect a change from a fast flowing stream in a tunnel to a more deflecting stream in front of the tunnel. On top of the esker sediments and partly interfingering with them, a cap of diamicton was deposited. The diamicton contains outsized clasts, in- terpreted as dropstones, and I conclude that it was pro- duced by undermelt and/or slumping of debris from the glacier or from collapsing ice bergs. The silt and sand laminae and thin beds within the diamicton could have been produced by current reworking and/or turbidite deposition from underflows. As the ice margin retreated, the deposition gradually changed from diamicton to interbedded, rhythmic silt and sand with iceberg dropped debris. Sedimentary structures in the rhythmic unit, such as “roll-up” struc- tures and convolute bedding indicate strong current ac- tivity and rapid sedimentation (Gustavson and Ashley 1975, Collinsson and Thompson 1982). The environment was marine, but the small number of molluscs may in- dicate rapid sedimentation or brackish water. If the rhythmic control has been seasonal, a mean sedimenta- tion rate of 0.17 m • y'1 for at least 160 years can be inferred for the sediments. This is a sedimentation rate at least fifty times faster than the one inferred for the fossiliferous Asbakkar diamicton, but it is similar to sedimentation rates in present day glaciomarine fjord environments on Svalbard (Elverhöi et al. 1983) and on Baffin Island (Gilbert 1982). The relative sea level dur- ing the deposition of the glaciomarine facies was higher than 23 m above the present level, which is the highest occurrence of undisturbed rhythmic silt and sand in the cliffs, probably considerably higher. THE LANDHÓLMI SANDS, MELAR DIAMICTON AND ÁSGIL GRAVELS: ICE PROXIMAL, ICE CONTACT AND ICE- MARGINAL FACIES ASSOCIATIONS There are indications in the cliffs of a glacial advance after the deposition of the Látrar beds glaciomarine facies. Three major stratigraphic units resulted from this advance: The Landhólmi sands, Melar diamicton and the Ásgil gravels. The Landhólmi sands: an ice proximal delta facies associ- ation Description: Between 2000 m and 2400 m, landwards of the Landhólmi skerry in the Látrar parts of the cliffs (Fig. 1), a unit of predom- inantly sands lies on top of the Látrar beds (Fig. 3, log D). There, the interbedded silt and sand facies of the Látrar beds become increasingly sandy upwards, and are overlain by a 1.2- 1.6 m thick sequence of massive pebble gravel (Gu), stratified silty sand (Ss) with discontinuous parallel laminations of sandy silt, and poorly sorted sand (Su). The gravelly-sandy sequence is conformably overlain by a 4-6 m thick single set of planar cross stratified, pebbly sand (Sp). Its foresets are angular to tangential based, 4-15 cm thick, with internal fining upwards from pebbly sand to coarse sand. The foresets dip towards SE-SW at angles between 10° and 27°. Interbedded in the cross stratified sand are up to 20 cm thick units of clast supported pebble to cobble gravels (Gu) and, in the upper part of the set, a number of 10-15 cm thick sandy-silty stratified diamicton lenses with peb- ble-cobble clasts (Dms). The interbedded units have erosive bases. The upper parts of the Landhólmi sands are tectonically dis- turbed, but the disturbance is complex and the exposure poor so that structural analysis was not attempted. The deposits are at places capped by ienses of boulder-rich diamicton and lag con- centrations of boulders (Fig. 10C). Interpretation of the Landhólmi sands Thick single set cross stratified sands and gravels can form where a glaciofluvial stream carries bedload into quieter water and deposits it via grainflow avalances down a foreset delta slope (e.g. Gustavson and Ashley 1975, Edwards 1978, Clemmensen andHoumark-Nielsen 1980). I suggest that the Landhólmi sands were depos- ited as a fan delta in an ice- proximal glaciomarine environment. The contact with the Látrar beds glacio- marine facies is non-erosional, and possibly the upper- most part of the Látrar beds are bottomsets of the delta, deposited beyond its cross stratified seaward face. The thin, graded foreset beds indicate deposition during a period of reducing flow strength. The interbedded grav- els and stratified diamictons could have been deposited from periodic strong current induced avalances or grain- flows and subaqueous slumps off an unstable delta front. Some of the gravel trains could be lag deposits. Thomas (1984a) described thin diamicton units, interbedded with foresets in an ancient glaciofluvial fan delta, as subaqueous slumps. The relative sea level during the deposition of the delta sediments was at least 30 m above the present level. The Melar diamicton: a lodgement till facies Description: Beneath the farm of Melar (Fig. 1), a 1-2 m thick diamicton sheet is exposed (Fig. 3, log C). It has an erosive base, and can be followed from the base of the sequence at 1500 m, where it disconformably overlies the Ásbakkar diamicton, concavely up- wards across the glaciomarine unit boundaries to the top of the sequence at 1700 m (Fig. 2). The diamicton is matrix supported and massive (Dmu), with clasts of all sizes from pebbles to large boulders embedded in a silty-sandy matrix (Fig. 10B), but clus- ters of boulders also occur (Dcu). The clasts are subrounded to 70
Blaðsíða 1
Blaðsíða 2
Blaðsíða 3
Blaðsíða 4
Blaðsíða 5
Blaðsíða 6
Blaðsíða 7
Blaðsíða 8
Blaðsíða 9
Blaðsíða 10
Blaðsíða 11
Blaðsíða 12
Blaðsíða 13
Blaðsíða 14
Blaðsíða 15
Blaðsíða 16
Blaðsíða 17
Blaðsíða 18
Blaðsíða 19
Blaðsíða 20
Blaðsíða 21
Blaðsíða 22
Blaðsíða 23
Blaðsíða 24
Blaðsíða 25
Blaðsíða 26
Blaðsíða 27
Blaðsíða 28
Blaðsíða 29
Blaðsíða 30
Blaðsíða 31
Blaðsíða 32
Blaðsíða 33
Blaðsíða 34
Blaðsíða 35
Blaðsíða 36
Blaðsíða 37
Blaðsíða 38
Blaðsíða 39
Blaðsíða 40
Blaðsíða 41
Blaðsíða 42
Blaðsíða 43
Blaðsíða 44
Blaðsíða 45
Blaðsíða 46
Blaðsíða 47
Blaðsíða 48
Blaðsíða 49
Blaðsíða 50
Blaðsíða 51
Blaðsíða 52
Blaðsíða 53
Blaðsíða 54
Blaðsíða 55
Blaðsíða 56
Blaðsíða 57
Blaðsíða 58
Blaðsíða 59
Blaðsíða 60
Blaðsíða 61
Blaðsíða 62
Blaðsíða 63
Blaðsíða 64
Blaðsíða 65
Blaðsíða 66
Blaðsíða 67
Blaðsíða 68
Blaðsíða 69
Blaðsíða 70
Blaðsíða 71
Blaðsíða 72
Blaðsíða 73
Blaðsíða 74
Blaðsíða 75
Blaðsíða 76
Blaðsíða 77
Blaðsíða 78
Blaðsíða 79
Blaðsíða 80
Blaðsíða 81
Blaðsíða 82
Blaðsíða 83
Blaðsíða 84
Blaðsíða 85
Blaðsíða 86
Blaðsíða 87
Blaðsíða 88
Blaðsíða 89
Blaðsíða 90
Blaðsíða 91
Blaðsíða 92
Blaðsíða 93
Blaðsíða 94
Blaðsíða 95
Blaðsíða 96
Blaðsíða 97
Blaðsíða 98
Blaðsíða 99
Blaðsíða 100
Blaðsíða 101
Blaðsíða 102
Blaðsíða 103
Blaðsíða 104
Blaðsíða 105
Blaðsíða 106
Blaðsíða 107
Blaðsíða 108
Blaðsíða 109
Blaðsíða 110
Blaðsíða 111
Blaðsíða 112
Blaðsíða 113
Blaðsíða 114
Blaðsíða 115
Blaðsíða 116

x

Jökull

Beinir tenglar

Ef þú vilt tengja á þennan titil, vinsamlegast notaðu þessa tengla:

Tengja á þennan titil: Jökull
https://timarit.is/publication/1155

Tengja á þetta tölublað:

Tengja á þessa síðu:

Tengja á þessa grein:

Vinsamlegast ekki tengja beint á myndir eða PDF skjöl á Tímarit.is þar sem slíkar slóðir geta breyst án fyrirvara. Notið slóðirnar hér fyrir ofan til að tengja á vefinn.