Jökull

Ataaseq assigiiaat ilaat

Jökull - 01.12.1987, Qupperneq 72

Jökull - 01.12.1987, Qupperneq 72
margin where meltwater entered the sea from subglacial tunnels. The change in texture and fabric, upwards with- in the esker sediments, could reflect a change from a fast flowing stream in a tunnel to a more deflecting stream in front of the tunnel. On top of the esker sediments and partly interfingering with them, a cap of diamicton was deposited. The diamicton contains outsized clasts, in- terpreted as dropstones, and I conclude that it was pro- duced by undermelt and/or slumping of debris from the glacier or from collapsing ice bergs. The silt and sand laminae and thin beds within the diamicton could have been produced by current reworking and/or turbidite deposition from underflows. As the ice margin retreated, the deposition gradually changed from diamicton to interbedded, rhythmic silt and sand with iceberg dropped debris. Sedimentary structures in the rhythmic unit, such as “roll-up” struc- tures and convolute bedding indicate strong current ac- tivity and rapid sedimentation (Gustavson and Ashley 1975, Collinsson and Thompson 1982). The environment was marine, but the small number of molluscs may in- dicate rapid sedimentation or brackish water. If the rhythmic control has been seasonal, a mean sedimenta- tion rate of 0.17 m • y'1 for at least 160 years can be inferred for the sediments. This is a sedimentation rate at least fifty times faster than the one inferred for the fossiliferous Asbakkar diamicton, but it is similar to sedimentation rates in present day glaciomarine fjord environments on Svalbard (Elverhöi et al. 1983) and on Baffin Island (Gilbert 1982). The relative sea level dur- ing the deposition of the glaciomarine facies was higher than 23 m above the present level, which is the highest occurrence of undisturbed rhythmic silt and sand in the cliffs, probably considerably higher. THE LANDHÓLMI SANDS, MELAR DIAMICTON AND ÁSGIL GRAVELS: ICE PROXIMAL, ICE CONTACT AND ICE- MARGINAL FACIES ASSOCIATIONS There are indications in the cliffs of a glacial advance after the deposition of the Látrar beds glaciomarine facies. Three major stratigraphic units resulted from this advance: The Landhólmi sands, Melar diamicton and the Ásgil gravels. The Landhólmi sands: an ice proximal delta facies associ- ation Description: Between 2000 m and 2400 m, landwards of the Landhólmi skerry in the Látrar parts of the cliffs (Fig. 1), a unit of predom- inantly sands lies on top of the Látrar beds (Fig. 3, log D). There, the interbedded silt and sand facies of the Látrar beds become increasingly sandy upwards, and are overlain by a 1.2- 1.6 m thick sequence of massive pebble gravel (Gu), stratified silty sand (Ss) with discontinuous parallel laminations of sandy silt, and poorly sorted sand (Su). The gravelly-sandy sequence is conformably overlain by a 4-6 m thick single set of planar cross stratified, pebbly sand (Sp). Its foresets are angular to tangential based, 4-15 cm thick, with internal fining upwards from pebbly sand to coarse sand. The foresets dip towards SE-SW at angles between 10° and 27°. Interbedded in the cross stratified sand are up to 20 cm thick units of clast supported pebble to cobble gravels (Gu) and, in the upper part of the set, a number of 10-15 cm thick sandy-silty stratified diamicton lenses with peb- ble-cobble clasts (Dms). The interbedded units have erosive bases. The upper parts of the Landhólmi sands are tectonically dis- turbed, but the disturbance is complex and the exposure poor so that structural analysis was not attempted. The deposits are at places capped by ienses of boulder-rich diamicton and lag con- centrations of boulders (Fig. 10C). Interpretation of the Landhólmi sands Thick single set cross stratified sands and gravels can form where a glaciofluvial stream carries bedload into quieter water and deposits it via grainflow avalances down a foreset delta slope (e.g. Gustavson and Ashley 1975, Edwards 1978, Clemmensen andHoumark-Nielsen 1980). I suggest that the Landhólmi sands were depos- ited as a fan delta in an ice- proximal glaciomarine environment. The contact with the Látrar beds glacio- marine facies is non-erosional, and possibly the upper- most part of the Látrar beds are bottomsets of the delta, deposited beyond its cross stratified seaward face. The thin, graded foreset beds indicate deposition during a period of reducing flow strength. The interbedded grav- els and stratified diamictons could have been deposited from periodic strong current induced avalances or grain- flows and subaqueous slumps off an unstable delta front. Some of the gravel trains could be lag deposits. Thomas (1984a) described thin diamicton units, interbedded with foresets in an ancient glaciofluvial fan delta, as subaqueous slumps. The relative sea level during the deposition of the delta sediments was at least 30 m above the present level. The Melar diamicton: a lodgement till facies Description: Beneath the farm of Melar (Fig. 1), a 1-2 m thick diamicton sheet is exposed (Fig. 3, log C). It has an erosive base, and can be followed from the base of the sequence at 1500 m, where it disconformably overlies the Ásbakkar diamicton, concavely up- wards across the glaciomarine unit boundaries to the top of the sequence at 1700 m (Fig. 2). The diamicton is matrix supported and massive (Dmu), with clasts of all sizes from pebbles to large boulders embedded in a silty-sandy matrix (Fig. 10B), but clus- ters of boulders also occur (Dcu). The clasts are subrounded to 70
Qupperneq 1
Qupperneq 2
Qupperneq 3
Qupperneq 4
Qupperneq 5
Qupperneq 6
Qupperneq 7
Qupperneq 8
Qupperneq 9
Qupperneq 10
Qupperneq 11
Qupperneq 12
Qupperneq 13
Qupperneq 14
Qupperneq 15
Qupperneq 16
Qupperneq 17
Qupperneq 18
Qupperneq 19
Qupperneq 20
Qupperneq 21
Qupperneq 22
Qupperneq 23
Qupperneq 24
Qupperneq 25
Qupperneq 26
Qupperneq 27
Qupperneq 28
Qupperneq 29
Qupperneq 30
Qupperneq 31
Qupperneq 32
Qupperneq 33
Qupperneq 34
Qupperneq 35
Qupperneq 36
Qupperneq 37
Qupperneq 38
Qupperneq 39
Qupperneq 40
Qupperneq 41
Qupperneq 42
Qupperneq 43
Qupperneq 44
Qupperneq 45
Qupperneq 46
Qupperneq 47
Qupperneq 48
Qupperneq 49
Qupperneq 50
Qupperneq 51
Qupperneq 52
Qupperneq 53
Qupperneq 54
Qupperneq 55
Qupperneq 56
Qupperneq 57
Qupperneq 58
Qupperneq 59
Qupperneq 60
Qupperneq 61
Qupperneq 62
Qupperneq 63
Qupperneq 64
Qupperneq 65
Qupperneq 66
Qupperneq 67
Qupperneq 68
Qupperneq 69
Qupperneq 70
Qupperneq 71
Qupperneq 72
Qupperneq 73
Qupperneq 74
Qupperneq 75
Qupperneq 76
Qupperneq 77
Qupperneq 78
Qupperneq 79
Qupperneq 80
Qupperneq 81
Qupperneq 82
Qupperneq 83
Qupperneq 84
Qupperneq 85
Qupperneq 86
Qupperneq 87
Qupperneq 88
Qupperneq 89
Qupperneq 90
Qupperneq 91
Qupperneq 92
Qupperneq 93
Qupperneq 94
Qupperneq 95
Qupperneq 96
Qupperneq 97
Qupperneq 98
Qupperneq 99
Qupperneq 100
Qupperneq 101
Qupperneq 102
Qupperneq 103
Qupperneq 104
Qupperneq 105
Qupperneq 106
Qupperneq 107
Qupperneq 108
Qupperneq 109
Qupperneq 110
Qupperneq 111
Qupperneq 112
Qupperneq 113
Qupperneq 114
Qupperneq 115
Qupperneq 116

x

Jökull

Direct Links

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Jökull
https://timarit.is/publication/1155

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.