Jökull


Jökull - 01.12.1987, Page 72

Jökull - 01.12.1987, Page 72
margin where meltwater entered the sea from subglacial tunnels. The change in texture and fabric, upwards with- in the esker sediments, could reflect a change from a fast flowing stream in a tunnel to a more deflecting stream in front of the tunnel. On top of the esker sediments and partly interfingering with them, a cap of diamicton was deposited. The diamicton contains outsized clasts, in- terpreted as dropstones, and I conclude that it was pro- duced by undermelt and/or slumping of debris from the glacier or from collapsing ice bergs. The silt and sand laminae and thin beds within the diamicton could have been produced by current reworking and/or turbidite deposition from underflows. As the ice margin retreated, the deposition gradually changed from diamicton to interbedded, rhythmic silt and sand with iceberg dropped debris. Sedimentary structures in the rhythmic unit, such as “roll-up” struc- tures and convolute bedding indicate strong current ac- tivity and rapid sedimentation (Gustavson and Ashley 1975, Collinsson and Thompson 1982). The environment was marine, but the small number of molluscs may in- dicate rapid sedimentation or brackish water. If the rhythmic control has been seasonal, a mean sedimenta- tion rate of 0.17 m • y'1 for at least 160 years can be inferred for the sediments. This is a sedimentation rate at least fifty times faster than the one inferred for the fossiliferous Asbakkar diamicton, but it is similar to sedimentation rates in present day glaciomarine fjord environments on Svalbard (Elverhöi et al. 1983) and on Baffin Island (Gilbert 1982). The relative sea level dur- ing the deposition of the glaciomarine facies was higher than 23 m above the present level, which is the highest occurrence of undisturbed rhythmic silt and sand in the cliffs, probably considerably higher. THE LANDHÓLMI SANDS, MELAR DIAMICTON AND ÁSGIL GRAVELS: ICE PROXIMAL, ICE CONTACT AND ICE- MARGINAL FACIES ASSOCIATIONS There are indications in the cliffs of a glacial advance after the deposition of the Látrar beds glaciomarine facies. Three major stratigraphic units resulted from this advance: The Landhólmi sands, Melar diamicton and the Ásgil gravels. The Landhólmi sands: an ice proximal delta facies associ- ation Description: Between 2000 m and 2400 m, landwards of the Landhólmi skerry in the Látrar parts of the cliffs (Fig. 1), a unit of predom- inantly sands lies on top of the Látrar beds (Fig. 3, log D). There, the interbedded silt and sand facies of the Látrar beds become increasingly sandy upwards, and are overlain by a 1.2- 1.6 m thick sequence of massive pebble gravel (Gu), stratified silty sand (Ss) with discontinuous parallel laminations of sandy silt, and poorly sorted sand (Su). The gravelly-sandy sequence is conformably overlain by a 4-6 m thick single set of planar cross stratified, pebbly sand (Sp). Its foresets are angular to tangential based, 4-15 cm thick, with internal fining upwards from pebbly sand to coarse sand. The foresets dip towards SE-SW at angles between 10° and 27°. Interbedded in the cross stratified sand are up to 20 cm thick units of clast supported pebble to cobble gravels (Gu) and, in the upper part of the set, a number of 10-15 cm thick sandy-silty stratified diamicton lenses with peb- ble-cobble clasts (Dms). The interbedded units have erosive bases. The upper parts of the Landhólmi sands are tectonically dis- turbed, but the disturbance is complex and the exposure poor so that structural analysis was not attempted. The deposits are at places capped by ienses of boulder-rich diamicton and lag con- centrations of boulders (Fig. 10C). Interpretation of the Landhólmi sands Thick single set cross stratified sands and gravels can form where a glaciofluvial stream carries bedload into quieter water and deposits it via grainflow avalances down a foreset delta slope (e.g. Gustavson and Ashley 1975, Edwards 1978, Clemmensen andHoumark-Nielsen 1980). I suggest that the Landhólmi sands were depos- ited as a fan delta in an ice- proximal glaciomarine environment. The contact with the Látrar beds glacio- marine facies is non-erosional, and possibly the upper- most part of the Látrar beds are bottomsets of the delta, deposited beyond its cross stratified seaward face. The thin, graded foreset beds indicate deposition during a period of reducing flow strength. The interbedded grav- els and stratified diamictons could have been deposited from periodic strong current induced avalances or grain- flows and subaqueous slumps off an unstable delta front. Some of the gravel trains could be lag deposits. Thomas (1984a) described thin diamicton units, interbedded with foresets in an ancient glaciofluvial fan delta, as subaqueous slumps. The relative sea level during the deposition of the delta sediments was at least 30 m above the present level. The Melar diamicton: a lodgement till facies Description: Beneath the farm of Melar (Fig. 1), a 1-2 m thick diamicton sheet is exposed (Fig. 3, log C). It has an erosive base, and can be followed from the base of the sequence at 1500 m, where it disconformably overlies the Ásbakkar diamicton, concavely up- wards across the glaciomarine unit boundaries to the top of the sequence at 1700 m (Fig. 2). The diamicton is matrix supported and massive (Dmu), with clasts of all sizes from pebbles to large boulders embedded in a silty-sandy matrix (Fig. 10B), but clus- ters of boulders also occur (Dcu). The clasts are subrounded to 70
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116

x

Jökull

Direct Links

If you want to link to this newspaper/magazine, please use these links:

Link to this newspaper/magazine: Jökull
https://timarit.is/publication/1155

Link to this issue:

Link to this page:

Link to this article:

Please do not link directly to images or PDFs on Timarit.is as such URLs may change without warning. Please use the URLs provided above for linking to the website.