Archaeologia Islandica - 01.01.2007, Qupperneq 59

Archaeologia Islandica - 01.01.2007, Qupperneq 59
Ancient ironmaking in Iceland, Greenland and Newfoundland their approach becomes descriptive. The prescriptive aspect of process metallurgy, expressed by this author, is largely miss- ing (e.g. Espelund 2004b). Out of 51 iron artefacts only 5 contained metallic iron and were studied by SEM analysis. Carbon and sulphur were determined by combustion and absorption. The two nails were as expect- ed high in phosphorus - low in carbon, while the rivet contained 0.12 and a steel sheet fragment 0.36 % C, both low in % P. No less than 15 trace elements were searched for, giving values around 0.01%, which can be regarded as the lower detec- tion limit and therefore disregarded. Only two values for molybdenum 0.061 (nail) (together with 0.60% P) and 0.13 (rivet) (together with 0.076 P) might indicate a special source of ore (:65). The values for the elements Mn and Si were copied from Rosenqvist (1977/85). The lump of cast iron measuring 2.5x2.2x2 cm (Ung- lik and Stewart 1999:20) can hardly be an intended product as no such production took place before the end of the Middle Ages (1300 in Sweden, 1600 in Norway, never in Denmark, Iceland or Greenland). It is more likely that it represents unsuc- cessful smelting at L’Anse aux Meadows, without proper slag control or, alterna- tively, a newer and foreign sample. The value for Si (0.73%) can represent strong reducing conditions and/or entrained slag. Pieces of cast iron have also been encountered by the present author in slag heaps at the Norwegian Roman Age smelting site Myggvollen and at an Even- stad type of furnace in Kása, community ofTolga. The authors also conclude that the cast iron was unintentional (Unglik and Stewart 1999:116). This author selected slag No. 2 (4A505B1-1) for a closer study. If the values for the two iron oxides are added as FeO, the value for the “fayalite ratio” R becomes 2.35, which is a normal figure after extraction of iron. The sum for this sample amounts to 97.4%. An interesting observation from these tables is the com- plete absence of molybdenum in the ore and in slag pieces, indicating that the nail and the rivet mentioned above appear to be of foreign origin. The two nails con- taining 0.60 and 0.56% P can hardly be the result of smelting at L’Anse aux Meadows, as two of the ores presented are so to speak phosphorus-free. Phos- phorus ensured stiffness, useful for a nail, to be driven into wood when a new ship was built, and not to be exposed to any impact later. This is a good expression of professional shipbuilding with access to different materials, characteristic for con- temporary Norway. Among the trace elements the values for molybdenum 0.061% (large nail) and 0.13% (large rivet) deserve special attention. As Mo is fully unex- pected, it has so far not been searched for in my own analyses of Norwegian ores and slags. Geochemical mapping of Scandinavia might reveal the source. According to the Norwegian Geologi- cal Survey there are two areas in South Norway where this element occurs in significant amounts (Korneliussen pers. comm.): Knaben in Setesdal, and Nor- dli near Eidsvoll. Bloomery ironmaking during the Viking Age - Medieval period cannot be excluded in the two areas. This information might reveal the provenance of the iron for the rivets. An analysis by means of microprobe of a sample from a bloom from Skeibrok, community of Lista, County of Vest-Agder UO C 22 615 at the south coast of Norway has shown similar values for molybdenum. By sheer 57
Qupperneq 1
Qupperneq 2
Qupperneq 3
Qupperneq 4
Qupperneq 5
Qupperneq 6
Qupperneq 7
Qupperneq 8
Qupperneq 9
Qupperneq 10
Qupperneq 11
Qupperneq 12
Qupperneq 13
Qupperneq 14
Qupperneq 15
Qupperneq 16
Qupperneq 17
Qupperneq 18
Qupperneq 19
Qupperneq 20
Qupperneq 21
Qupperneq 22
Qupperneq 23
Qupperneq 24
Qupperneq 25
Qupperneq 26
Qupperneq 27
Qupperneq 28
Qupperneq 29
Qupperneq 30
Qupperneq 31
Qupperneq 32
Qupperneq 33
Qupperneq 34
Qupperneq 35
Qupperneq 36
Qupperneq 37
Qupperneq 38
Qupperneq 39
Qupperneq 40
Qupperneq 41
Qupperneq 42
Qupperneq 43
Qupperneq 44
Qupperneq 45
Qupperneq 46
Qupperneq 47
Qupperneq 48
Qupperneq 49
Qupperneq 50
Qupperneq 51
Qupperneq 52
Qupperneq 53
Qupperneq 54
Qupperneq 55
Qupperneq 56
Qupperneq 57
Qupperneq 58
Qupperneq 59
Qupperneq 60
Qupperneq 61
Qupperneq 62
Qupperneq 63
Qupperneq 64
Qupperneq 65
Qupperneq 66
Qupperneq 67
Qupperneq 68
Qupperneq 69
Qupperneq 70
Qupperneq 71
Qupperneq 72
Qupperneq 73
Qupperneq 74
Qupperneq 75
Qupperneq 76
Qupperneq 77
Qupperneq 78
Qupperneq 79
Qupperneq 80
Qupperneq 81
Qupperneq 82
Qupperneq 83
Qupperneq 84
Qupperneq 85
Qupperneq 86
Qupperneq 87
Qupperneq 88
Qupperneq 89
Qupperneq 90
Qupperneq 91
Qupperneq 92
Qupperneq 93
Qupperneq 94
Qupperneq 95
Qupperneq 96
Qupperneq 97
Qupperneq 98
Qupperneq 99
Qupperneq 100
Qupperneq 101
Qupperneq 102
Qupperneq 103
Qupperneq 104

x

Archaeologia Islandica

Direct Links

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Archaeologia Islandica
https://timarit.is/publication/1160

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.