Archaeologia Islandica - 01.01.2015, Side 41

Archaeologia Islandica - 01.01.2015, Side 41
Abandoned Settlements at the Foot of Mt Hekla according to contemporary sources many farms in Biskupstungur and Rangárvellir were abandoned due to the tephra fall (Is- landske annaler, 351-52). Hekla erupted again in 1389 and again the tephra fall was great and caused much damage. It is believed that this time the lava flow cov- ered two to three farms (Islandske annaler, 351-52). The next large eruption in Hekla was in 1510. Tephra from this eruption covered a large part of Rangárvellir as well as the neighbouring districts of Landsveit and Landeyjar. Even if the quantity of tephra from this eruption was no greater than in many of the earlier eruptions, it seems to have had a triggering effect marking the beginning of the dramatic soil erosion that was to have a significant impact on the landscape and farms of Rangárvellir in the following centuries (Egilsson 1856, 44-45; Friðriksson 1988, 10). Contemporary documents suggest that the eruption in 1693 caused one farm in Þjórsárdalur to be abandoned permanent- ly and four other farms to be temporarily abandoned; two in Landsveit and two in Gnúpverjahreppur. This eruption is de- scribed thoroughly in written sources so the effects can be assessed with some ac- curacy (Þórarinsson 1968). Eruptions in 1766 and 1845 had little effect in populated areas because the tephra fall was mostly in the hinterland north of the volcano where however rangeland vegetation was affected (Þórarinsson 1968, 84-147). The last erup- tion in Hekla to cause significant damage to inhabited areas was in 1947. The tephra fall was mainly in Fljótshlíð and the north- ern part of Rangárvellir, causing two farms to be permanently abandoned in the latter district (Hjartarson 1995, 164-66). This brief overview gives an idea of the extent of the direct influence of Hekla's eruptions on the districts around it. The indirect effects of the eruptions are more difficult to assess but they seem to have had an even greater impact on the settlement in the form of soil erosion and other changes of the quality of the land. Indirect impact of Hekla: Soil erosion Iceland is mainly made up of basaltic bed- rock types but a tuff belt creates an arch in the middle, stretching from the south, over the middle of the highlands, to the north and northeast. Ihe soil in the basaltic bed- rock areas holds moisture better than the sandy soil on top of the tuff and therefore the risk of soil erosion is greater in the tuff areas. In the research area the combination of a tuff-based soil, volcanic activity and cli- mate change has caused massive and wide- spread soil erosion (Sveinsson & Campbell 1958, 255, 261). From the 13thcentury to the 19ththe average temperature decreased significantly (Mann et al. 2009). The effects of this on vegetation were most severe in the highlands of Iceland and in the settled areas in the tuff belt, in part because of the 39

x

Archaeologia Islandica

Direkte link

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Archaeologia Islandica
https://timarit.is/publication/1160

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.