Læknablaðið - 01.03.2023, Blaðsíða 16

132 L ÆKNABL AÐIÐ 2023/109
R A N N S Ó K N
ingunartími kvikasilfurs er langur má færa rök fyrir því að rétt
sé að kynna slíkar ráðleggingar fyrir konum á barneignaraldri.
Þakkir
Við viljum þakka ljósmæðrum Heilsugæslu höfuðborgarsvæð-
isins fyrir gott samstarf við framkvæmd rannsóknarinnar sem,
þrátt fyrir miklar annir á tímum heimsfaraldurs, gáfu sér tíma í
þetta verkefni og leystu það af metnaði. Við viljum einnig þakka
þátttakendum sem gáfu sér tíma til að sitja undir fræðslu, svara
spurningalistum og gefa hársýni. Án þeirra hefði þessi rannsókn
ekki verið möguleg.
Greinin barst til blaðsins 28. ágúst 2022,
samþykkt til birtingar 3. febrúar 2023.
Heimildir
1. Environment U. GLOBAL MERCURY ASSESSMENT 2018 UN .Environment Programme
Chemicals and Health Branch. Genf, Sviss 2019.
2. EFSA. Scientific Opinion on the risk for public health related to the presence of mercury
and methylmercury in food. EFSA J 2012; 10 (12).
3. Stern AH, Smith AE. An assessment of the cord blood:maternal blood methylmercury
ratio: implications for risk assessment. Environ Health Perspect 2003; 111: 1465-70.
4. Harada M. Minamata disease: methylmercury poisoning in Japan caused by environ-
mental pollution. Crit Rev Toxicol 1995; 25: 1-24.
5. Grandjean P, Weihe P, White RF, et al. Cognitive deficit in 7-year-old children with
prenatal exposure to methylmercury. Neurotoxicol Teratol 1997; 19: 417-28.
6. Debes F, Weihe P, Grandjean P. Cognitive deficits at age 22 years associated with prenatal
exposure to methylmercury. Cortex 2016; 74: 358-69.
7. Jacobson JL, Muckle G, Ayotte P, et al. Relation of Prenatal Methylmercury Exposure from
Environmental Sources to Childhood IQ. Environ Health Perspect 2015; 123: 827-33.
8. Davidson PW, Myers GJ, Cox C, et al. Effects of prenatal and postnatal methylmercury
exposure from fish consumption on neurodevelopment: outcomes at 66 months of age in
the Seychelles Child Development Study. JAMA 1998; 280: 701-7.
9. US-EPA. Integrated Risk Information System. Methylmercury (MeHg). Chemical
Assessment Summary 2001; (CASRN 22967-2-6). - desember 2022.
10. Toxicological Effects of Methylmercury. Washington (DC) 2000.
11. National Board of Health D. Healthy habits before, during and after pregnancy. 2015.
sst.dk/-/media/Udgivelser/2017/Sunde-vaner-før-under-og-efter-graviditet/Sunde_vaner.
ashx - desember 2022.
12. National Health Service. Foods to avoid in pregnancy. 2020. nhs.uk/pregnancy/keeping
well/foods-to-avoid/ - desember 2022.
13. Mataræði á meðgöngu: Fróðleikur fyrir konur á barneignaraldri. Embætti landlæknis í
samstarfi við Matvælastofnun, Mæðravernd Þróunarstofu heilsugæslu höfuðborgarsvæð-
isins og Rannsóknastofu í næringarfræði, Reykjavík 2018.
14. Adlard B, Lemire M, Bonefeld-Jorgensen EC, et al. MercuNorth - monitoring mercury in
pregnant women from the Arctic as a baseline to assess the effectiveness of the Minamata
Convention. Int J Circumpolar Health 2021; 80: 1881345.
15. Den Hond E, Govarts E, Willems H, et al. First steps toward harmonized human biomon-
itoring in Europe: demonstration project to perform human biomonitoring on a European
scale. Environ Health Perspect 2015; 123: 255-63.
16. Packull-McCormick S, Ratelle M, Lam C, et al. Hair to blood mercury concentration ratios
and a retrospective hair segmental mercury analysis in the Northwest Territories, Canada.
Environ Res 2022; 203: 111800.
17. Castano A, Pedraza-Diaz S, Canas AI, et al. Mercury levels in blood, urine and hair in a
nation-wide sample of Spanish adults. Sci Total Environ 2019; 670: 262-70.
18. Jónsdóttir AH, SH Lund. Tölfræði frá grunni. Háskóli Íslands, Reykjavík 2022.
19. McKelvey W, Jeffery N, Clark N, et al. Population-based inorganic mercury biomonitoring
and the identification of skin care products as a source of exposure in New York City.
Environ Health Perspect 2011; 119: 203-9.
20. Partearroyo T, Samaniego-Vaesken ML, Ruiz E, et al. Current Food Consumption amongst
the Spanish ANIBES Study Population. Nutrients 2019; 11: 2663.
21. Gunnarsdóttir S, Þorgeirsdóttir H, Torfadóttir JE, et al. Hvað borða Íslendingar? Embætti
landlæknis og Rannsóknastofa í næringarfræði við Háskóla Íslands, Reykjavík 2022.
22. Sanzo JM, Dorronsoro M, Amiano P, et al. Estimation and validation of mercury intake
associated with fish consumption in an EPIC cohort of Spain. Public Health Nutr 2001; 4:
981-8.
23. Reykdal Ó, Desnica N, Hauksdóttir S, et al. Næringargildi sjávarafurða. Meginefni, stein-
efni, snefilefni og fitusýrur í lokaafurðum. Matís, Reykjavík 2011.
24. McMeans BC, Arts MT, Fisk AT. Impacts of food web structure and feeding behavior on
mercury exposure in Greenland Sharks (Somniosus microcephalus). Sci Total Environ
2015; 509-10: 216-25.
25. Newman MC, Xu X, Cotton CF, et al. High mercury concentrations reflect trophic ecology
of three deep-water chondrichthyans. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 2011; 60: 618-25.
26. Jo S, Woo HD, Kwon HJ, et al. Estimation of the Biological Half-Life of Methylmercury
Using a Population Toxicokinetic Model. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2015; 12 : 9054-
67.
27. Kirk LE, Jorgensen JS, Nielsen F, et al. Public health benefits of hair-mercury analysis and
dietary advice in lowering methylmercury exposure in pregnant women. Scand J Public
Health 2017; 45: 444-51.
28. Bhandare D, Ruchi R. Unusual complication of an Alaskan cruise: thinking outside the
box. BMJ Case Rep 2019; 12: e227727.
29. Risher JF. Too much of a good thing (fish): methylmercury case study. J Environ Health
2004; 67: 9-14, 28.
30. Knobeloch LM, Ziarnik M, Anderson HA, et al. Imported seabass as a source of mercury
exposure: a Wisconsin case study. Environ Health Perspect 1995; 103: 604-6.
E N G L I S H S U M M A R Y
Levels of mercury in hair among pregnant women in Iceland
INTRODUCTION: To limit exposure to methylmercury several countries have implimented specific
advice on fish intake to pregnant women as well a measuring compliance through regular human
biomonitoring. Despite fish intake being relatively high in Iceland, human biomonitoring data on
mercury is scarce.
MATERIALS AND MEHODS: We measured mercury in hair from 120 pregnant women recruited in 2021
from the the Reykjavik Capital area. At recruitment, information on fish intake during the past four
months was recorded. Hair mercury concentrations were compared to existing health based guidance
values and associatons with fish intake was explored.
RESULTS: Mean (standard deviation) mercury concentration in hair was 0.48 μg/g (0.33). All
participants had concentrations in hair below 1.8 μg/g, which corresponds to the hair value that
the tolerable daily intake set by the European Food Safety Authority is derived from, while 5% had
concentrations above 1.1 μg/g, which corresponds to the hair value that the US-EPA reference dose
is derived from. Mean mercury concentrations in hair increased in a dose dependent manner (p for
trend <0.001) from 0.25 μg/g among women who consumed fish ≤ 3/month (n=24) and up to 0.80 mg/g
among those consuming fish 3-4/ week (n=16). The few (n=3) women who reported to have eaten shark
(<1/month) were all at the higher end of the exposure distribution.
CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that exposure is generally below the tolerable daily intake set by
EFSA but may in some women exceed the reference dose established by the US-EPA.
doi 10.17992/lbl.2023.03.733
*Edda Dufþaksdóttir1
*Eva Jacobsen1
Ása Valgerður Eiríksdóttir2
Óla Kallý Magnúsdóttir3
Kristín Ólafsdóttir2
Þórhallur Ingi Halldórsson1
*These authors contributed equally to this work
1Faculty of Food Science and Nutrition, Univeristy of
Iceland, 2Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology,
University of Iceland, 3Development Centre for Primary
Health Care in Iceland.
Correspondence: Þórhallur Ingi Halldórsson, tih@hi.is
Key words: mercury, seafood, pregnancy, hair,
biomonitoring.