Árbók VFÍ/TFÍ - 01.06.2007, Page 231

oska sérhæfðari upplýsinga. Nákvæmara greiningartæki má byggja á 18 frumþátta fram-
setningu Crawfords og gefur það nákvæmari upplýsingar um viðfangsefnið. Hvort
Sreiningartæki fyrir sig hefur sína kosti. Hæfnisaugað er heppilegt sem kennslutæki og
fil að gefa almenna heildarsýn. 18 frumþátta framsetningin er heppilegri sem rann-
sóknartæki og til að gefa dýpri skilning.
t’akkir eru færðar Þorbjörgu Sæmundsdóttur M.Sc. fyrir mikilvæga aðstoð við að vinna úr
Sögnum fyrir petta verkefni.
Heimildir
ib International Standards Organization ISO (2003). 10006:2003(E) Quality Management Systems - Guidelines forQuality
Management in Projects. Geneva: ISO copyright office.
[2] Project Management Institute (PMI) (2004). Project Management Body of Knowledge, Newtown Square: Project
Management Institute.
[^] Kerzner H. (2006). Project Management - a Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling and Controlling. 9th edition.
Hoboken:Wiley.
f4] Jugdev K. and Muller R. (2005). Retrospective Look at our Evolving Understanding of Project Success. Project
Management Journal, Vol. 36 (4), 19-31.
[5] Verkefnastjórnunarfélag íslands - VSF - www.vsf.is - ágúst 2007.
fó] Editor: Morten Fangel (2005). Competencies in Project Management - National Competence Baseline for Scandinavia.
Denmark: Associations of Project Management in Denmark, Norway and Sweden.
[7] IPMA - International Project Management Association (2006). IPMA Competence Baseline (ICB) Version 3.0. The
Netherlands:IPMA.
t®] Zobel A. M. & Wearn S. H. (2000). Project Management Topic Coverage in Recent Conferences. Project Management
Journal.31 (2), 32-37.
^] Drli B. & Urli D. (2000). Project management in North America, stability ofthe concepts. Project Management Journal, 31
(3), 33-43.
f10] Crawford L., Pollack J. & England D. (2006). Uncovering the trends in project management: Journal emphases over the
last 10 years. International Journal of Project Management, 24 (2), 175-184.
[H] Ingason H. and Jonasson H. (2006). Exploring the Content of Project Management. Proceedings of the 20th IPMA
Congress, Shangai.
[1 2] Stanford University - http://apm.stanford.edu/courses/credit.html - Ágúst 2006.
[]3] EuroMPM program - www.eurompm.net - Ágúst 2006.
MP/W námið - www.mpm.is - Ágúst 2006.
t15] University ofManagement and Technology - www.umtweb.edu - Ágúst 2006.
t]6] Luecke R. (2004). Managing Projects Large and Small - The Fundamental Skills for Delivering on Budget and on Time.
Boston: Harvard business school publishing corporation.
t17] Newell M. W. & Grashina M. N. (2004). The Mroject Management Book - Question and Answer. New York: American
Management Association.
[18] Verzuh E . (2005). The fast forward MBA in project management. Hoboken: Wiley.
[1°] KlastorinT. (2004). Project management - Tools and Trade Offs. Hoboken: Wiley.
[2°] Gido J.& Clements J. P. (2003).SuccessfulProjectManagement.Ohio:Thomson.
[21] Schwalbe K. (2006). Introduction to Project management. Boston:Thomson.
[22] Burke R. (2003). Project Management - Planning and Control Techniques. Chichester: Wiley.
[23] Meredith J.& Mantel S. J. (2006). Project Management - a Managerial Approach. Hoboken:Wiley.
[24] DeCarlo D. (2004). Extreme project management. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
[25] Forsberg K., Mooz H. & Cotterman H. (2005). Visualizing Project Management - Models and Framework for Mastering
Complex Systems. New Jersey: Wiley.
[26] Mikkelsen H. & Riis J. O. (2003). Grundbog iprojektledelse. Rungsted: Prodevo.
Ritrýndar vísindagreinar i229