Íslenskar landbúnaðarrannsóknir - 01.03.1970, Qupperneq 97

Íslenskar landbúnaðarrannsóknir - 01.03.1970, Qupperneq 97
COLOUR INHERITANCE IN ICELANDIC SHEEP 95 fay their assumed breeding value for other characteristics. It must finally be mentioned that on the assumption that selective fertilization and selective mortality are operating as indicated by table 44, the calculated gene frequencies in table 53 are biassed. CHAPTER VII Analysis of segregation of loci B and S, and linkage between colour loci A. SEGREGATION AT THE B-LOCUS Table 55 shows the results from matings of both parents with known genotypes at the B-locus classified by genotypes of par- ents and sex of lambs, anci table 56 shows a comparison of observecl with expected frequencies in matings showing segrega- tion. As table 55 and 56 show the segregation results are in excellent agreement with the assumption that black and brown pigment are produced by two allelic genes, Bx and Bo, and Bx being dominant to B2. There is no difference between reciprocal matings and no difference between sexes of progeny. It is also noticeable that no detectable ex- ceptions from expectation have occurred. The classification of the pigment types has been done correctly as far as can be check- ed. B. SEGREGATION AT THE S-LOCUS Table 57 shows the results from matings with both genotypes of parents known at locus S prior to mating. In the table tlie progeny have been grouped into two classes only, those showing no white markings and those showing white markings. The results of table 57 agree well with the hypothesis that white markings are caused by a single, recessive gene S2, in homozygous condition. The lack of pro- geny showing white markings in matings with both parents lieterozygous for white markings must be ascribed to chance fluc- tuation, the probability of all 8 progeny showing absence of white markings being 0.100. As several lambs with white mark- ings were obtained from matings where both parents were without white markings and of unknown genotype previously, there is no doubt that the character is recessive. The lamb without white markings out of parents showing white markings in table 57 was born on farm No. 1. Date of mating 25/12/1960, date oí lambing 18/5/1961. Twins, a brown male witli white markings, colour 0926, and a greybrown female, colour 0600. Sire No. 01080, brown with white markings, colour 0981 genotype A5A5B2B2S2S2. Dam No. 01823, grey- brown with white markings, colour 0662, genotype A2 A5B2B2S2S2. Faulty parentage in this case is excluded. The most likely explanation is that the extent of the white markings is affected by a number of niodi- fying genes and by chance variation, and that this effect has led to a complete ab- sence of white markings in this particular lamb. The sire showed white markings only on liead and feet and gave several progeny showing only a very limited amount of white markings. The mating SjS2 X S2S2 has altogether
Qupperneq 1
Qupperneq 2
Qupperneq 3
Qupperneq 4
Qupperneq 5
Qupperneq 6
Qupperneq 7
Qupperneq 8
Qupperneq 9
Qupperneq 10
Qupperneq 11
Qupperneq 12
Qupperneq 13
Qupperneq 14
Qupperneq 15
Qupperneq 16
Qupperneq 17
Qupperneq 18
Qupperneq 19
Qupperneq 20
Qupperneq 21
Qupperneq 22
Qupperneq 23
Qupperneq 24
Qupperneq 25
Qupperneq 26
Qupperneq 27
Qupperneq 28
Qupperneq 29
Qupperneq 30
Qupperneq 31
Qupperneq 32
Qupperneq 33
Qupperneq 34
Qupperneq 35
Qupperneq 36
Qupperneq 37
Qupperneq 38
Qupperneq 39
Qupperneq 40
Qupperneq 41
Qupperneq 42
Qupperneq 43
Qupperneq 44
Qupperneq 45
Qupperneq 46
Qupperneq 47
Qupperneq 48
Qupperneq 49
Qupperneq 50
Qupperneq 51
Qupperneq 52
Qupperneq 53
Qupperneq 54
Qupperneq 55
Qupperneq 56
Qupperneq 57
Qupperneq 58
Qupperneq 59
Qupperneq 60
Qupperneq 61
Qupperneq 62
Qupperneq 63
Qupperneq 64
Qupperneq 65
Qupperneq 66
Qupperneq 67
Qupperneq 68
Qupperneq 69
Qupperneq 70
Qupperneq 71
Qupperneq 72
Qupperneq 73
Qupperneq 74
Qupperneq 75
Qupperneq 76
Qupperneq 77
Qupperneq 78
Qupperneq 79
Qupperneq 80
Qupperneq 81
Qupperneq 82
Qupperneq 83
Qupperneq 84
Qupperneq 85
Qupperneq 86
Qupperneq 87
Qupperneq 88
Qupperneq 89
Qupperneq 90
Qupperneq 91
Qupperneq 92
Qupperneq 93
Qupperneq 94
Qupperneq 95
Qupperneq 96
Qupperneq 97
Qupperneq 98
Qupperneq 99
Qupperneq 100
Qupperneq 101
Qupperneq 102
Qupperneq 103
Qupperneq 104
Qupperneq 105
Qupperneq 106
Qupperneq 107
Qupperneq 108
Qupperneq 109
Qupperneq 110
Qupperneq 111
Qupperneq 112
Qupperneq 113
Qupperneq 114
Qupperneq 115
Qupperneq 116
Qupperneq 117
Qupperneq 118
Qupperneq 119
Qupperneq 120
Qupperneq 121
Qupperneq 122
Qupperneq 123
Qupperneq 124
Qupperneq 125
Qupperneq 126
Qupperneq 127
Qupperneq 128
Qupperneq 129
Qupperneq 130
Qupperneq 131
Qupperneq 132
Qupperneq 133
Qupperneq 134
Qupperneq 135
Qupperneq 136
Qupperneq 137
Qupperneq 138
Qupperneq 139
Qupperneq 140

x

Íslenskar landbúnaðarrannsóknir

Direct Links

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Íslenskar landbúnaðarrannsóknir
https://timarit.is/publication/1499

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.