Íslenskar landbúnaðarrannsóknir


Íslenskar landbúnaðarrannsóknir - 01.09.1978, Side 112

Íslenskar landbúnaðarrannsóknir - 01.09.1978, Side 112
110 ÍSLENZKAR LANDBÚNAÐARRANNSÓKNIR escapement which was spawning above the trap. Eslirnalion of egg to smolt survival If we have the wild smolt survival and the resultant run of salmon in a year, it is possible to calculate the-egg-to-smolt sur- vival using the escapement a few years earlier and the average fecundity of the females. The estimated survival ofwild smolts is approximalely 26% '(Fig. 2). The total estimated return from wild salmon as ap- proximately 3,600 in 1976 which means that the total outmigration of smolts in 1975 was close to 14.000. Fridriksson (1949) showed that the majority of the smolts at Ellidaár stay three winters in freshwater, which means that the smolts in question were mostly 1971 (brood). Ac- cording to Mundy et al. (1978), the es- capement at Ellidaár in 1971 was 1,560 salmon. Assuming a 50% female ratio, 780 females spawned in that year. Fecundity data from grilse spawned at Kollafjördur indicate that a female grilse lays about 0.5 liters of approximately 8,800 eggs per liter or an average deposi- tion of 4,400 eggs. Since the present data indicate that the grilse at Ellidaár are smaller than those at Kollafjördur, we will use a figure of 4,000 eggs per female. The total egg deposition at Ellidaár in 1971 was 780 X 4,000 = 3,120,000 eggs. The total survival from eggs to smolts (14,000) was thus 0.4%. This rough figure seems to be comparable to figures re- ported by Buck and Munro (1972) for Girnock Burn in Scotland which amounted to 0.5-0.7%. These figures, of course, are low compared to the 50% eggs-to-smolt survival obtained in hatch- eries. Survival of hatchery and wild smolts The survival rates of the various hatchery smolts including 1976 and 1977 recovery seasons are shown in Fig. 2. The release pönd smolts produced better survival than that obtained from the direct plant smolts, significant at the 0.05 level. Survi- val was doubled by using the release pond. This difference might be even greater since the smolts in the direct plant were 15.5 cm long compared to 14.0 cm in the release pond groups. The total return from the release pond group (8.2%) is very similar to the survi- val of 2-year outdoor smolts released at Kollafjördur Fish Farm in 1975 with only one group exceeding 9% and all others being below 6% (Isaksson and Bergman, 1978). There is no question that a consid- erable improvement in return rates would have been observed by using higher qual- ity smolts. Therefore, direct plants of smolts into rivers should be discontinued. The release ofhandled hatchery smolts, those tagged at the river, was primarily intended as a control for the wild smolts. If one compares the survival of handled and unhandled hatchery smolts, there is ap- proximately 24 percent difference in sur- vival which is assumed due to the extra handling at the river. Application of this factor to the wild smolts increased the es- timated survival from 20.8 to 25.8%. The survival of the wild smolts, which only measured 12.5 cm at downstream migration, is exceptional compared to the hatchery smolts; as a matter of fact, such figures have never been obtained for At-
Side 1
Side 2
Side 3
Side 4
Side 5
Side 6
Side 7
Side 8
Side 9
Side 10
Side 11
Side 12
Side 13
Side 14
Side 15
Side 16
Side 17
Side 18
Side 19
Side 20
Side 21
Side 22
Side 23
Side 24
Side 25
Side 26
Side 27
Side 28
Side 29
Side 30
Side 31
Side 32
Side 33
Side 34
Side 35
Side 36
Side 37
Side 38
Side 39
Side 40
Side 41
Side 42
Side 43
Side 44
Side 45
Side 46
Side 47
Side 48
Side 49
Side 50
Side 51
Side 52
Side 53
Side 54
Side 55
Side 56
Side 57
Side 58
Side 59
Side 60
Side 61
Side 62
Side 63
Side 64
Side 65
Side 66
Side 67
Side 68
Side 69
Side 70
Side 71
Side 72
Side 73
Side 74
Side 75
Side 76
Side 77
Side 78
Side 79
Side 80
Side 81
Side 82
Side 83
Side 84
Side 85
Side 86
Side 87
Side 88
Side 89
Side 90
Side 91
Side 92
Side 93
Side 94
Side 95
Side 96
Side 97
Side 98
Side 99
Side 100
Side 101
Side 102
Side 103
Side 104
Side 105
Side 106
Side 107
Side 108
Side 109
Side 110
Side 111
Side 112
Side 113
Side 114
Side 115
Side 116
Side 117
Side 118
Side 119
Side 120
Side 121
Side 122
Side 123
Side 124
Side 125
Side 126
Side 127
Side 128
Side 129
Side 130
Side 131
Side 132
Side 133
Side 134
Side 135
Side 136
Side 137
Side 138
Side 139
Side 140
Side 141
Side 142
Side 143
Side 144
Side 145
Side 146
Side 147
Side 148
Side 149
Side 150
Side 151
Side 152
Side 153
Side 154
Side 155
Side 156
Side 157
Side 158
Side 159
Side 160
Side 161
Side 162
Side 163
Side 164
Side 165
Side 166
Side 167
Side 168
Side 169
Side 170
Side 171
Side 172
Side 173
Side 174
Side 175
Side 176
Side 177
Side 178
Side 179
Side 180

x

Íslenskar landbúnaðarrannsóknir

Direkte link

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Íslenskar landbúnaðarrannsóknir
https://timarit.is/publication/1499

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.