Íslenskar landbúnaðarrannsóknir


Íslenskar landbúnaðarrannsóknir - 01.09.1978, Page 112

Íslenskar landbúnaðarrannsóknir - 01.09.1978, Page 112
110 ÍSLENZKAR LANDBÚNAÐARRANNSÓKNIR escapement which was spawning above the trap. Eslirnalion of egg to smolt survival If we have the wild smolt survival and the resultant run of salmon in a year, it is possible to calculate the-egg-to-smolt sur- vival using the escapement a few years earlier and the average fecundity of the females. The estimated survival ofwild smolts is approximalely 26% '(Fig. 2). The total estimated return from wild salmon as ap- proximately 3,600 in 1976 which means that the total outmigration of smolts in 1975 was close to 14.000. Fridriksson (1949) showed that the majority of the smolts at Ellidaár stay three winters in freshwater, which means that the smolts in question were mostly 1971 (brood). Ac- cording to Mundy et al. (1978), the es- capement at Ellidaár in 1971 was 1,560 salmon. Assuming a 50% female ratio, 780 females spawned in that year. Fecundity data from grilse spawned at Kollafjördur indicate that a female grilse lays about 0.5 liters of approximately 8,800 eggs per liter or an average deposi- tion of 4,400 eggs. Since the present data indicate that the grilse at Ellidaár are smaller than those at Kollafjördur, we will use a figure of 4,000 eggs per female. The total egg deposition at Ellidaár in 1971 was 780 X 4,000 = 3,120,000 eggs. The total survival from eggs to smolts (14,000) was thus 0.4%. This rough figure seems to be comparable to figures re- ported by Buck and Munro (1972) for Girnock Burn in Scotland which amounted to 0.5-0.7%. These figures, of course, are low compared to the 50% eggs-to-smolt survival obtained in hatch- eries. Survival of hatchery and wild smolts The survival rates of the various hatchery smolts including 1976 and 1977 recovery seasons are shown in Fig. 2. The release pönd smolts produced better survival than that obtained from the direct plant smolts, significant at the 0.05 level. Survi- val was doubled by using the release pond. This difference might be even greater since the smolts in the direct plant were 15.5 cm long compared to 14.0 cm in the release pond groups. The total return from the release pond group (8.2%) is very similar to the survi- val of 2-year outdoor smolts released at Kollafjördur Fish Farm in 1975 with only one group exceeding 9% and all others being below 6% (Isaksson and Bergman, 1978). There is no question that a consid- erable improvement in return rates would have been observed by using higher qual- ity smolts. Therefore, direct plants of smolts into rivers should be discontinued. The release ofhandled hatchery smolts, those tagged at the river, was primarily intended as a control for the wild smolts. If one compares the survival of handled and unhandled hatchery smolts, there is ap- proximately 24 percent difference in sur- vival which is assumed due to the extra handling at the river. Application of this factor to the wild smolts increased the es- timated survival from 20.8 to 25.8%. The survival of the wild smolts, which only measured 12.5 cm at downstream migration, is exceptional compared to the hatchery smolts; as a matter of fact, such figures have never been obtained for At-
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180

x

Íslenskar landbúnaðarrannsóknir

Direct Links

If you want to link to this newspaper/magazine, please use these links:

Link to this newspaper/magazine: Íslenskar landbúnaðarrannsóknir
https://timarit.is/publication/1499

Link to this issue:

Link to this page:

Link to this article:

Please do not link directly to images or PDFs on Timarit.is as such URLs may change without warning. Please use the URLs provided above for linking to the website.