The Botany of Iceland - 01.12.1928, Side 76

The Botany of Iceland - 01.12.1928, Side 76
400 JOHS. BOYE PETERSEN Navicula radiosa Kútz. Gl. Sjrn. II, p. 17. Van Heurck Syn. Pl. VII, flg. 20. N. Icel. 169. This very common fresh water species (0strup 286 samples) can hardly thrive on land, and as a malter of fact I found no specimens with cell contents in the sarnple. -----v. minutissima Grun. Cl. Syn. II, p. 17. E. Icel. 125. The specimen found had the following dimensions: L. 20 /r, br. 3,3 /i, str.18 in 10/í,being thus in close agreement with Cleve’s description (l.c.). — — var. tenella (Bréb.) Van Heurck. CI. Syn. II, p. 17. V. H. Syn. Pl. VII, flg. 21-22. V. H. Types No. 107. Vestmannaeyjar L. 399. This variety comes very near to N. cincta var. Cari. In fact, I am not sure that they can be kept distinct. According to Cleve and other authors it is a form that thrives in quite fresh water. On the Vest- mannaeyjar I found it in considerable quantity in a rocky cave at a height of 20 m. There was plentj' of moisture present, so that its oc- currence in tliis place does not warrant the assumption that it is a pro- nounced aérial species. Navicula viridula Kutz. Cl. Syn. II, p. 15. Van Heurck Syn. Pl. VII, fig. 25. N. Icel. 135? Only a single specimen was observed. Its dimensions were: L. 79 /x, br. 15 /a., str. 8 in 10 /i. Pinnularia Ehrb. Pinnularia appendiculata Ag. Cl. Syn. II, p. 75. Van Heurck Syn. Pl. VI, fig. 18 and 20. E. Icel. 123 — N. Icel. 217 - W. Icel. L. 338 — S. Icel. 295. This species has long been known to be habitual among mosses, on damp rocks, and in similar places (Cl. 1. c.). Ostrup found it in Iceland in 19 samples from fresh water, hence it must be inferred that it is no pronounced aérial alga. It was common in sample 338 which was from the soil of a potato field near the hot springs by Helgavatn. — — var. budensis Grun. Cl. Syn. II, p. 75. Van Heurck Syn. Pl. VI, fig. 27, 28. N. Icel. L. 133, 256. This variety is chiefly known from hot springs. 0strup found it in Iceland in 3 samples, 2 of which were from hot springs. None of the 2 samples in which I observed it was derived from the vicinity of hot springs.
Side 1
Side 2
Side 3
Side 4
Side 5
Side 6
Side 7
Side 8
Side 9
Side 10
Side 11
Side 12
Side 13
Side 14
Side 15
Side 16
Side 17
Side 18
Side 19
Side 20
Side 21
Side 22
Side 23
Side 24
Side 25
Side 26
Side 27
Side 28
Side 29
Side 30
Side 31
Side 32
Side 33
Side 34
Side 35
Side 36
Side 37
Side 38
Side 39
Side 40
Side 41
Side 42
Side 43
Side 44
Side 45
Side 46
Side 47
Side 48
Side 49
Side 50
Side 51
Side 52
Side 53
Side 54
Side 55
Side 56
Side 57
Side 58
Side 59
Side 60
Side 61
Side 62
Side 63
Side 64
Side 65
Side 66
Side 67
Side 68
Side 69
Side 70
Side 71
Side 72
Side 73
Side 74
Side 75
Side 76
Side 77
Side 78
Side 79
Side 80
Side 81
Side 82
Side 83
Side 84
Side 85
Side 86
Side 87
Side 88
Side 89
Side 90
Side 91
Side 92
Side 93
Side 94
Side 95
Side 96
Side 97
Side 98
Side 99
Side 100
Side 101
Side 102
Side 103
Side 104
Side 105
Side 106
Side 107
Side 108
Side 109
Side 110
Side 111
Side 112
Side 113
Side 114
Side 115
Side 116
Side 117
Side 118
Side 119
Side 120
Side 121
Side 122
Side 123
Side 124

x

The Botany of Iceland

Direkte link

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: The Botany of Iceland
https://timarit.is/publication/1834

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.